I didn't attack him for being white. I attacked him for having a persecution complex, which it clearly is.
I don't think anyone cares what color he is. But he can still be a little whiny snowflake about the persecution he thinks he has to overcome.
Where does he say that he has persecution to over come?
YOu assumed that. And attacked him based on it.
Is he responsible for your assumptions about him?
Save your spin words for the tourists, btw. NOthing he has said, justifies you calling him a "snowflake".
That is just you being an asshole.
Claiming that "It's okay to be white" indicates that someone told him that it's NOT ok to be white, indicating that he feels that he is being persecuted.
QED
This isn't complicated.
Unless someone did tell him that it is not ok to be white. Then stating that it is ok, is a completely valid comeback, and you are just an asshole for calling him names.
Your pretense that your analysis was so obvious, is you being either completely stupid, or completely dishonest.
Which is it?
"Where does he say that he has persecution to over come?"
He just said it, dumbass. Read his response. It was obvious.
This is a persecution complex. Someone said something mean to him and he feels that he is being persecuted about it.
Ok, I know that part of being a liberal, is having your brain wiped and then filled only with approved facts.
One of the things you lose, is the concept of linear time.
So, to refresh for you. When you initially made your claim, you were accusing him of something he had not yet done.
Later, after he
met your challenge on showing that people had said that, then
AT THAT LATER POINT IN TIME, that point was no longer relevant to the discussion, but
still TRUE about your earlier statement, made
EARLIER in TIME.
I understand that reintegrating the concept of linear time will take you a good deal of time.
That means we can revisit these points
LATER IN TIME, if you need to.
AT THIS POINT IN TIME, he has refuted your bullshit point about "persecution complex" and "snowflake",
AND in doing so, your initial attack on him and his post, is revealed once again, as I said, AT THE START OF THIS, (TIME REFERENCE)
to demonstrate the need to say it.
Like I said, it is a brilliant meme.
As people like you attack him, and the more you attack him, and the more desperate your attacks get, the more you demonstrate the validity of him saying it.