Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think they're frankly more capable.I would enjoy seeing SpaceX get people to the moon before NASA/Artemis does.
Unfortunately NASA is limited by budget. I think NASA needs fresh leadership and more funding - but overall, I prefer the market as it give better options.I think they're frankly more capable.
NASA is now a multi-national program with all the complications that entails.
Essentially, I'm in agreement, although the full power of a government agency and budget can do things that private enterprise can't always equal.Unfortunately NASA is limited by budget. I think NASA needs fresh leadership and more funding - but overall, I prefer the market as it give better options.
I would wish to see NASA get a large boost in budget so we can start colonizing the moon. Artemis II is the most impressive manned mission in decades, and we need more of it.Essentially, I'm in agreement, although the full power of a government agency and budget can do things that private enterprise can't always equal.
No question that private enterprise is much more efficient, though.

Artemis sent up lookers, Space X will land on the moon with cargo and explorers.I would wish to see NASA get a large boost in budget so we can start colonizing the moon. Artemis II is the most impressive manned mission in decades, and we need more of it.
Space X do better, it will carry fuel to the moon.It boils down to the Rocket Equation.
If SpaceX can prove orbital refueling, then it doesn’t change the equation. It changes how it is applied.
But physics is still physics.
WW