Israeli justice: Man Who Wouldn’t Teach ‘Rabin Legacy’ Wins NIS 400,000

[Lipush]

An Assistant Principal who was fired for objecting to a program extolling the legacy of Prime Minister Yitzchak Rabin has been awarded 400,000 shekels.

Yisrael Shiran expressed strong disagreement in the year 2000 to a proposed program to honor Rabin and teach students about his “legacy of peace” on the occasion of the annual Rabin Day memorial.

Rabin led Israel into the Oslo Accords, under which the PLO terrorist group renounced terrorism and was allowed to settle in Judea, Samaria and Gaza as the Palestinian Authority, and to obtain weapons. He was assassinated in 1995 by Yigal Amir, who said his objection to Rabin’s agreements with the PLO was the motive for the slaying.

Whilst nearly all Israelis, from left to right, condemn the assassination, many also reject the lionization of Rabin by the Israeli left, saying that the Oslo Accords were in fact a disaster for the Jewish State and resulted in a wave of terrorism which killed and injured thousands.

Mourning his murder is one thing, they say, but promoting his legacy is something else entirely.

In a letter to his superiors, Shiran echoed such sentiments:

“Ever since the horrible murder of the belated Prime Minister, the Education Ministry has been ordering that we hold memorial rallies and talk to students about Rabin’s legacy of peace…. We cannot in any way agree that a man who gave weapons to enemies who are seeking to destroy us is someone whose legacy, path and personality we should be discussing.”

Man Who Refused ?Rabin Legacy? Wins in Court - Inside Israel - News - Israel National News

-----------

WELL DONE

 

[pbel]

An Assistant Principal who was fired for objecting to a program extolling the legacy of Prime Minister Yitzchak Rabin has been awarded 400,000 shekels.

Yisrael Shiran expressed strong disagreement in the year 2000 to a proposed program to honor Rabin and teach students about his “legacy of peace” on the occasion of the annual Rabin Day memorial.

Rabin led Israel into the Oslo Accords, under which the PLO terrorist group renounced terrorism and was allowed to settle in Judea, Samaria and Gaza as the Palestinian Authority, and to obtain weapons. He was assassinated in 1995 by Yigal Amir, who said his objection to Rabin’s agreements with the PLO was the motive for the slaying.

Whilst nearly all Israelis, from left to right, condemn the assassination, many also reject the lionization of Rabin by the Israeli left, saying that the Oslo Accords were in fact a disaster for the Jewish State and resulted in a wave of terrorism which killed and injured thousands.

Mourning his murder is one thing, they say, but promoting his legacy is something else entirely.

In a letter to his superiors, Shiran echoed such sentiments:

“Ever since the horrible murder of the belated Prime Minister, the Education Ministry has been ordering that we hold memorial rallies and talk to students about Rabin’s legacy of peace…. We cannot in any way agree that a man who gave weapons to enemies who are seeking to destroy us is someone whose legacy, path and personality we should be discussing.”

Man Who Refused ?Rabin Legacy? Wins in Court - Inside Israel - News - Israel National News

-----------

WELL DONE

Israelis reject peace as a Nation and the day will come when that policy will destroy her if she does not change.

 

[Lipush]

An Assistant Principal who was fired for objecting to a program extolling the legacy of Prime Minister Yitzchak Rabin has been awarded 400,000 shekels.

Yisrael Shiran expressed strong disagreement in the year 2000 to a proposed program to honor Rabin and teach students about his “legacy of peace” on the occasion of the annual Rabin Day memorial.

Rabin led Israel into the Oslo Accords, under which the PLO terrorist group renounced terrorism and was allowed to settle in Judea, Samaria and Gaza as the Palestinian Authority, and to obtain weapons. He was assassinated in 1995 by Yigal Amir, who said his objection to Rabin’s agreements with the PLO was the motive for the slaying.

Whilst nearly all Israelis, from left to right, condemn the assassination, many also reject the lionization of Rabin by the Israeli left, saying that the Oslo Accords were in fact a disaster for the Jewish State and resulted in a wave of terrorism which killed and injured thousands.

Mourning his murder is one thing, they say, but promoting his legacy is something else entirely.

In a letter to his superiors, Shiran echoed such sentiments:

“Ever since the horrible murder of the belated Prime Minister, the Education Ministry has been ordering that we hold memorial rallies and talk to students about Rabin’s legacy of peace…. We cannot in any way agree that a man who gave weapons to enemies who are seeking to destroy us is someone whose legacy, path and personality we should be discussing.”

Man Who Refused ?Rabin Legacy? Wins in Court - Inside Israel - News - Israel National News

-----------

WELL DONE

Israelis reject peace as a Nation and the day will come when that policy will destroy her if she does not change.

Oh ShutUp.

Court compensated someone who was illegally fired because he didn't obey the "thoughts police".

that is way more important than your fake 'peace'

 

[pbel]

An Assistant Principal who was fired for objecting to a program extolling the legacy of Prime Minister Yitzchak Rabin has been awarded 400,000 shekels.

Yisrael Shiran expressed strong disagreement in the year 2000 to a proposed program to honor Rabin and teach students about his “legacy of peace” on the occasion of the annual Rabin Day memorial.

Rabin led Israel into the Oslo Accords, under which the PLO terrorist group renounced terrorism and was allowed to settle in Judea, Samaria and Gaza as the Palestinian Authority, and to obtain weapons. He was assassinated in 1995 by Yigal Amir, who said his objection to Rabin’s agreements with the PLO was the motive for the slaying.

Whilst nearly all Israelis, from left to right, condemn the assassination, many also reject the lionization of Rabin by the Israeli left, saying that the Oslo Accords were in fact a disaster for the Jewish State and resulted in a wave of terrorism which killed and injured thousands.

Mourning his murder is one thing, they say, but promoting his legacy is something else entirely.

In a letter to his superiors, Shiran echoed such sentiments:

“Ever since the horrible murder of the belated Prime Minister, the Education Ministry has been ordering that we hold memorial rallies and talk to students about Rabin’s legacy of peace…. We cannot in any way agree that a man who gave weapons to enemies who are seeking to destroy us is someone whose legacy, path and personality we should be discussing.”

Man Who Refused ?Rabin Legacy? Wins in Court - Inside Israel - News - Israel National News

-----------

WELL DONE

Israelis reject peace as a Nation and the day will come when that policy will destroy her if she does not change.

Oh ShutUp.

Court compensated someone who was illegally fired because he didn't obey the "thoughts police".

that is way more important than your fake 'peace'

For a converted adopted Puerto Rican non-ethnic Jew, you sure are more radical than the rest when it comes to peace.

 

[Lipush]

Israelis reject peace as a Nation and the day will come when that policy will destroy her if she does not change.

Oh ShutUp.

Court compensated someone who was illegally fired because he didn't obey the "thoughts police".

that is way more important than your fake 'peace'

For a converted adopted Puerto Rican non-ethnic Jew, you sure are more radical than the rest when it comes to peace.

Radical?

I protect the idea of free speech and liberty of opinion.

That's the total opposite of being radical.

Radical are those who think that whoever rejects bowing down to the "peace" idea is instantly a warmonger.

 

[pbel]

Oh ShutUp.

Court compensated someone who was illegally fired because he didn't obey the "thoughts police".

that is way more important than your fake 'peace'

For a converted adopted Puerto Rican non-ethnic Jew, you sure are more radical than the rest when it comes to peace.

Radical?

I protect the idea of free speech and liberty of opinion.

That's the total opposite of being radical.

Radical are those who think that whoever rejects bowing down to the "peace" idea is instantly a warmonger.

The only thing you support is "PIECES of Arab Lands," who are you kidding?

 

[Lipush]

For a converted adopted Puerto Rican non-ethnic Jew, you sure are more radical than the rest when it comes to peace.

Radical?

I protect the idea of free speech and liberty of opinion.

That's the total opposite of being radical.

Radical are those who think that whoever rejects bowing down to the "peace" idea is instantly a warmonger.

The only thing you support is "PIECES of Arab Lands," who are you kidding?

You're reaching.

Bring proof that I support such thing. You can't.

 

[pbel]

Radical?

I protect the idea of free speech and liberty of opinion.

That's the total opposite of being radical.

Radical are those who think that whoever rejects bowing down to the "peace" idea is instantly a warmonger.

The only thing you support is "PIECES of Arab Lands," who are you kidding?

You're reaching.

Bring proof that I support such thing. You can't.

Well then, answer a simple question senorita: Do you support a Palestinian State to the pre-67 borders that the UN endorsed?

 

[Hossfly]

Oh ShutUp.

Court compensated someone who was illegally fired because he didn't obey the "thoughts police".

that is way more important than your fake 'peace'

For a converted adopted Puerto Rican non-ethnic Jew, you sure are more radical than the rest when it comes to peace.

Radical?

I protect the idea of free speech and liberty of opinion.

That's the total opposite of being radical.

Radical are those who think that whoever rejects bowing down to the "peace" idea is instantly a warmonger.

Free speech and liberty of opinion is a nonsequitur for Moslems, Lipush. Don't mock them.

 

[pbel]

For a converted adopted Puerto Rican non-ethnic Jew, you sure are more radical than the rest when it comes to peace.

Radical?

I protect the idea of free speech and liberty of opinion.

That's the total opposite of being radical.

Radical are those who think that whoever rejects bowing down to the "peace" idea is instantly a warmonger.

Free speech and liberty of opinion is a nonsequitur for Moslems, Lipush. Don't mock them.

Hoss, if the Semites want to destroy each other, let them. Just keep America out of it...We have spilled enough blood of our-own citizens for your squabbles!

Get it?

 

[Hossfly]

Radical?

I protect the idea of free speech and liberty of opinion.

That's the total opposite of being radical.

Radical are those who think that whoever rejects bowing down to the "peace" idea is instantly a warmonger.

Free speech and liberty of opinion is a nonsequitur for Moslems, Lipush. Don't mock them.

Hoss, if the Semites want to destroy each other, let them. Just keep America out of it...We have spilled enough blood of our-own citizens for your squabbles!

Get it?

What did Hossfly say that brought that on?

 

[Lipush]

The only thing you support is "PIECES of Arab Lands," who are you kidding?

You're reaching.

Bring proof that I support such thing. You can't.

Well then, answer a simple question senorita: Do you support a Palestinian State to the pre-67 borders that the UN endorsed?

You mean, the solution in which the Jewish people have to give up their historic rights of Jerusalem?

 

[Alfalfa]

You're reaching.

Bring proof that I support such thing. You can't.

Well then, answer a simple question senorita: Do you support a Palestinian State to the pre-67 borders that the UN endorsed?

You mean, the solution in which the Jewish people have to give up their historic rights of Jerusalem?

There are no historical jewish rights to jerusalem. This is a canard put out by zionists who repeat it over and over as if it means anything.

NOBODY in the world believes it except jewish and xtian zionists.

 

[Hossfly]

Well then, answer a simple question senorita: Do you support a Palestinian State to the pre-67 borders that the UN endorsed?

You mean, the solution in which the Jewish people have to give up their historic rights of Jerusalem?

There are no historical jewish rights to jerusalem. This is a canard put out by zionists who repeat it over and over as if it means anything.

NOBODY in the world believes it except jewish and xtian zionists.

"Go away kid. Ya bother me."
~~W.C. Fields

 

[pbel]

You're reaching.

Bring proof that I support such thing. You can't.

Well then, answer a simple question senorita: Do you support a Palestinian State to the pre-67 borders that the UN endorsed?

You mean, the solution in which the Jewish people have to give up their historic rights of Jerusalem?

What historic right? The Palestinians were there longer than the ancient Israelites...besides my Roman ancestors destroyed that dust ball in 67 A.D.! Tell us what a Historic right is Chiquita.

 

[Hossfly]

Radical?

I protect the idea of free speech and liberty of opinion.

That's the total opposite of being radical.

Radical are those who think that whoever rejects bowing down to the "peace" idea is instantly a warmonger.

Free speech and liberty of opinion is a nonsequitur for Moslems, Lipush. Don't mock them.

Hoss, if the Semites want to destroy each other, let them. Just keep America out of it...We have spilled enough blood of our-own citizens for your squabbles!

Get it?

Why does every anti-Semite always insinuate that America has spilled blood for Israel? Meanwhile, you never see these anti-Semites on the other forums condemning all the blood that is spilled by their new friends -- the extremist Muslims. These Dhimwits are so pathetic. I wonder if Phillip would ever report on a Muslim winning a prize after he has killed dozens of Infidels.

 

[Hossfly]

I wonder if Alfalfa can tell us how many times Jerusalem is mentioned in the Koran. If he can't tell us this, perhaps he can give us his latest on the LGBT groups that he was blabbering about elseware.Imagine Alfalfa talking about something like that in a Muslim country. I have a great idea, since Alfalfa is a class act when it comes to Dhimwis perhaps he can emulate Mohammed and get on a magic horsey for a little ride.

 

[Hossfly]

Well then, answer a simple question senorita: Do you support a Palestinian State to the pre-67 borders that the UN endorsed?

You mean, the solution in which the Jewish people have to give up their historic rights of Jerusalem?

What historic right? The Palestinians were there longer than the ancient Israelites...besides my Roman ancestors destroyed that dust ball in 67 A.D.! Tell us what a Historic right is Chiquita.

So tell us, Phillip, where did all these so-called ancient people disappear to. If you weren't so busy with your silly poems and crayon box elseware, you would have noticed other posters showing sites where travelers through the land (and I am not just including Mark Twain but others also) who said that all they saw were a few Bedouins. Meanwhile, the British Officials in the area reported later on that the Arabs were coming in droves from their impoverished surrounding countries when the Jews had jobs for them. Surely, you are not trying to tell us that the population in Boston now is made up entirely of the same ethnic and religious groups of say 30 years ago. All of us living in the U.S. unless we are living in very small populated towns have noticed the change, and you living in a big city certainly must have noticed it unless you are comatose.

 

[pbel]

You mean, the solution in which the Jewish people have to give up their historic rights of Jerusalem?

What historic right? The Palestinians were there longer than the ancient Israelites...besides my Roman ancestors destroyed that dust ball in 67 A.D.! Tell us what a Historic right is Chiquita.

So tell us, Phillip, where did all these so-called ancient people disappear to. If you weren't so busy with your silly poems and crayon box elseware, you would have noticed other posters showing sites where travelers through the land (and I am not just including Mark Twain but others also) who said that all they saw were a few Bedouins. Meanwhile, the British Officials in the area reported later on that the Arabs were coming in droves from their impoverished surrounding countries when the Jews had jobs for them. Surely, you are not trying to tell us that the population in Boston now is made up entirely of the same ethnic and religious groups of say 30 years ago. All of us living in the U.S. unless we are living in very small populated towns have noticed the change, and you living in a big city certainly must have noticed it unless you are comatose.

Keep pilling up your horse shit...

Demographics of Palestine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

According to Alexander Scholch, Palestine in 1850 had about 350,000 inhabitants, 30% of whom lived in 13 towns; roughly 85% were Muslims, 11% were Christians and 4% Jews[24]

 

[docmauser1]

What historic right? The Palestinians were there longer than the ancient Israelites...

Palistanian folklore, 1001 nights and stuff.

besides my Roman ancestors destroyed that dust ball in 67 A.D.!

Ah! Jews are baaack!