Israel has maintained a strictly apartheid system in varying forms

A small minority of non-whites under control of Apartheid South Africa voted in Apartheid South Africa. The vast majority, citizens of the Bantustans (completely controlled by white-ruled South Africa much like the West Bank and Gaza) could not vote.




That was S.A. it is not Israel and now the majority of Black South Africans want a return of white rule and certain aspects of apartheid because of the extreme levels of violence, rape and murder. As forecast the black South Africans and the ANC have destroyed South Africa, and the leaders live in heavily guarded compounds because of the violence. More blacks murdered by the police in the last 12 months than were killed during the whole of white rule.

So, you are stating that Black South Africans want a return to white rule. You are not denying that Israel is an Apartheid state. That's a start. However, I don't believe that a majority of South African blacks want a return to white rule. Can you point me to one of your "unbiased" sources that validate that claim.



Yes they do and yes I am denying that Israel is apartheid

Black man says Bring back Apartheid - YouTube

South Africa s Coloureds Better Off Under Apartheid - YouTube

One black man means all black South Africans? Why did the ANC win the recent elections?
 
A small minority of non-whites under control of Apartheid South Africa voted in Apartheid South Africa. The vast majority, citizens of the Bantustans (completely controlled by white-ruled South Africa much like the West Bank and Gaza) could not vote.




That was S.A. it is not Israel and now the majority of Black South Africans want a return of white rule and certain aspects of apartheid because of the extreme levels of violence, rape and murder. As forecast the black South Africans and the ANC have destroyed South Africa, and the leaders live in heavily guarded compounds because of the violence. More blacks murdered by the police in the last 12 months than were killed during the whole of white rule.

So, you are stating that Black South Africans want a return to white rule. You are not denying that Israel is an Apartheid state. That's a start. However, I don't believe that a majority of South African blacks want a return to white rule. Can you point me to one of your "unbiased" sources that validate that claim.



Yes they do and yes I am denying that Israel is apartheid

Black man says Bring back Apartheid - YouTube

South Africa s Coloureds Better Off Under Apartheid - YouTube

One black man means all black South Africans? Why did the ANC win the recent elections?



No not one black man at all Abdul, it is just one of many millions who feel the same way.

Vote rigging which is common under Islamic and neo Marxist rule
 
What lies? Can you state one of them?



See the other thread were I have given two examples of your LIES.

You have not given any examples on any other thread. You are using smoke and mirrors to mask the fact that I have not lied, ever. I simply state fact.



LIAR as the evidence shows you have LIED constantly and now you are looking for a way out.

An example already given is your claim of using "source" documents when you use published works written by a committee and edited by a publishing house. You do not even know what a "source" document is.
 
Having failed to complete its ethnic cleansing in 1948, an Arab population remained which was subjected to martial law through 1966, deprived entirely of civil rights. The 1950 Israeli law regarding "absentee property" declared all Arab properties vacated even briefly between November 1947 and May 1948 to be "abandoned" and therefore subject to confiscation and reassignment to Jewish occupancy and ownership. The Israeli refusal to allow displaced Arabs to return to their homes and properties was and remains in direct violation of international law and UN Resolution 194 under which Israel is bound as a UN member state.
Funny, indeed. Anyway, palistanians, thieving and trying on themselves histories of other peoples, is a well-known trait.
 
The Jews are the ones that went to Palestine from another continent and stole the land.
 
Doesn't matter.

The amount of land still controlled by Palestinians continues to shrink every month.

Pretty soon, they'll be stacked 10-tall, standing on each others' shoulders, balancing on scattered, disjointed, unstable slivers of land no bigger than a postage stamp.

Any Palestinian-Arab-Muslim with an ounce of brains and two shekels to rub together will get himself and his family out of there as soon as humanly possible.

To build new and far better and happier lives, elsewhere.

The rest will probably be flushed out of their holes and sent packing across the Jordanian and Lebanese borders sometime in the next decade or two.

Sooner, if the Muslims piss off the Jews badly enough.
 
The Palestinians aren't going anywhere. Nobody is going to "send them packing" and they now outnumber Jews in the land whose land borders, air space and territorial sea are controlled by Israel. Get the picture.
 
The Palestinians aren't going anywhere. Nobody is going to "send them packing" and they now outnumber Jews in the land whose land borders, air space and territorial sea are controlled by Israel. Get the picture.
Yeah... stacked 10-high, standing on each others' shoulders, on several postage-stamp -sized scraps of land, armed to 5% of the extent that their adversaries are armed.

Yeah... tell us all about how demographics pressure is going to stop the modest remaining fragments of annexation required, to complete the Reconquista.
 
That's how the non-whites were "stacked 10 high" in South Africa's Bantustans. Do you think that the Jews will be able to rule over an ever increasing non-Jew majority for the long-term?
 
Having failed to complete its ethnic cleansing in 1948, an Arab population remained which was subjected to martial law through 1966, deprived entirely of civil rights. The 1950 Israeli law regarding "absentee property" declared all Arab properties vacated even briefly between November 1947 and May 1948 to be "abandoned" and therefore subject to confiscation and reassignment to Jewish occupancy and ownership. The Israeli refusal to allow displaced Arabs to return to their homes and properties was and remains in direct violation of international law and UN Resolution 194 under which Israel is bound as a UN member state.

Israeli apartheid

Where is Humanity and the "Yawn" GIF?

I order one to this thread, please.
 
WRONG as the LoN being the legal owners of the land gave it to the Jews. It was the arab muslims that actually stole it from the Jews, and forcibly removed them from their property In Jerusalem and the west bank in 1948-1949
 
WRONG as the LoN being the legal owners of the land gave it to the Jews. It was the arab muslims that actually stole it from the Jews, and forcibly removed them from their property In Jerusalem and the west bank in 1948-1949

The League of Nations were not "the legal owners" as you claim. The League of Nations did not "give it to the Jews". "Trusteeship" is not ownership. Next?
 
The Palestinians aren't going anywhere. Nobody is going to "send them packing" and they now outnumber Jews in the land whose land borders, air space and territorial sea are controlled by Israel. Get the picture.




They have had the demographics since the end of WW1 and have failed to do anything with them, so what will happen to change that. Even with the combined forces of the arab league they still could not beat the Jews, and ended up getting soundly destroyed every time they tried. All Israel has to do is to keep the weapons outside of gaza and the Palestinians are reduced to living in abject poverty while their leaders live in luxury well removed from the fighting.
So Abdul what has changed in the last 100 years to make the arab muslims so much stronger and to make them better able to defeat the better armed, better trained and better equipped Israeli Defence Force. Have they grown jet engines so they can fly, nuclear centrifuges in their stomachs so they can produce nuclear bombs. They face utter defeat and even more dead every time they try and win a war with Israel, and soon the world will turn a blind eye to the IDF bombing and killing after seeing the way that hamas puts the civilians in danger
 
As I said, you are a psychopath. All you can do is revel in the killing of non-Jewish women and children through the use of their advanced weapons. But, even in your crazed mind you must realize the world will eventually turn against Israel's mass killing of Palestinian women and children as they turned against Germany's mass killing of Jews and others.
 
Try again Abdul the LoN were the legal owners after the Ottomans gave them all the land as war booty, they held the land in trustyship until the relevant groups could show a capability to govern the land for themselves. Read the Mandate for Palestine and the many treaties and you will see a recurring theme, Palestine was for the Jews to RECREATE THE NATIONAL OF THE JEWS IN PALESTINE. It does not mention the arab muslims once in that mandate, or in any of the treaties dealing with Palestine.
 
As I said, you are a psychopath. All you can do is revel in the killing of non-Jewish women and children through the use of their advanced weapons. But, even in your crazed mind you must realize the world will eventually turn against Israel's mass killing of Palestinian women and children as they turned against Germany's mass killing of Jews and others.




Actually the world is turning against you lot and will soon be deporting you lot back to the cess pits you crawled out of. Even the UN is starting to get sick of your antics and is looking at ways to bring the Palestinians into line. No one but an ISLAMONAZI revels in the deaths of women and children as that is wrong, but the world is now seeing hamas putting women and children in front of the weapons to protect them and is demanding hamas be dragged before the ICC
 
Try again Abdul the LoN were the legal owners after the Ottomans gave them all the land as war booty, they held the land in trustyship until the relevant groups could show a capability to govern the land for themselves. Read the Mandate for Palestine and the many treaties and you will see a recurring theme, Palestine was for the Jews to RECREATE THE NATIONAL OF THE JEWS IN PALESTINE. It does not mention the arab muslims once in that mandate, or in any of the treaties dealing with Palestine.

Trusteeship does not equate to "legal ownership". The Mandate does indeed mention the non-Jewish indigenous people of Palestine. As stated in the Mandate:

"Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favor of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, " This also demonstrates that their were "existing" non-Jewish communities before the Jews migrated to Palestine.
 
Now equate that to Customary International law as applicable in 1920 when this treaty was signed and you see that it means so much less than it would today. You cant back date laws to another century to suit your POV and politics. The fact remains that at no time was any land in Palestine given to the arab muslims for a National Home. All they were given was the right to become citizens of the RESURECTED NATIONAL HOME FOR THE JEWS.

Also as the British show it was the arab muslims that illegally migrated to Palestine and invaded the land, the Jews had been invited to migrate and settle the land by the Ottomans and then the LoN. So the so called Palestinians have no legal rights in Palestine other than those in place in 1920.

Did you understand the last part of your much abused posting of the Mandate that gives the Jews the inalienable right to live in any nation without hindrance, violence, expulsion and religious intolerance. Something you are in breach of every time you post.
 
WRONG as the LoN being the legal owners of the land gave it to the Jews. It was the arab muslims that actually stole it from the Jews, and forcibly removed them from their property In Jerusalem and the west bank in 1948-1949

The League of Nations did not "own" Palestine. It was a trusteeship. The European Jews stole the land from the Christians and Muslims.
 

Forum List

Back
Top