Isn’t it time we brought back the pomp and circumstance and the sense of awe for that office

[sealybobo]

The president of the United States is the most powerful person in the world. The president is the spokesman for democracy and liberty. Isn’t it time we brought back the pomp and circumstance and the sense of awe for that office that we all held? That means everyone in the administration should look and act professionally, especially the presidential. Impressions matter.”

I seldom, if ever, agree with the individual that allegedly wrote those words, but in this case they are spot on.

Even slimy lying Ted Cruz would be more respectable. Trumps embarrassing but I love it! Republicans are proving they'll defend anything. This can not be fun for them or don. He's the king of snowflakes

It is fun for us it's shock and awe at the liberal press..like a cat fight liberal Trump goes after the liberal media..

So amusing.

.

And even I like some of the things the gop are going to do. Deportations, spending cuts, fix trade deals. Still don't like them but these things I don't hate.

 

[ricechickie]

What has a bull in a china shop EVER accomplished?

In this case, if we go with the 'bull in the china shop' metaphor, we are getting rid of a lot of unnecessary and ugly bric a brac that should have been discarded long ago and making room for a brighter future.

Those of us who elected Trump didn't elect him for his dignified manner, and ability to play the part of the 'perfect politician'. We've had those types for far too long and all it has netted us is crushing debt, regulation, and taxes along with impossible mandates, inefficiency, ineffectiveness, and a sluggish economy that has hurt many millions of Americans.

We didn't want another member of the professional politicians permanent political class. We want somebody who wasn't afraid to do things differently, who wasn't tied to the status quo, who didn't adhere to the principle of 'we've always done it that way.'

Just be careful that he only clears away what YOU want.

Thing is, in this metaphor, bulls don't have a hell of a lot of control.

Yep, sounds like Trump.

Trump once again cleaned up in only 6 months Obama's mess of trying to fundamentally change America into Europe.


.



.

Cool story.

You hate the truth?


.

In those two words you managed to divine my truth-hating.

Excellent abilities.

Do you do children's parties?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Absolutely, when a new structure is needed.

Dumb.

And dare I say it? A rationalization.

This is like those people who throw around the Jefferson quote about watering the tree of liberty with the blood of patriots and tyrants. But everyone backs away when a Congressperson actually gets shot.

You dare say it, you are correct: It is a rationalization.

And I may say: Zero ***** given.

Don't complain when the next President that you don't vote for is acting like a Fifth Grade bully. The precedent has been set.

Zero ***** given, indeed.

The precedent was set... 8 years ago

I don't recall this level of disrespect from President Obama toward those who hurt his feelings.

This is what I see from the current president.

There's no comparison between the way obama was treated and the way Trump is treated. Was there ever a comparable Stephen Colbert to obama? No.

 

[Wyatt earp]

That's what they were hired to do.

They were hired to govern.

Wrong! They were hired to represent their constituents' best interest, not govern.

That is governing.

No, it's not. You know who governs?

Governors.

They are all part of the government.

We have 50 States...you are starting to sound like pogo.

It the United States of America

Not the united state ...


We hate the elite fags of California / new York and the 47% trying to get free stuff.






.

 

[ricechickie]

Dumb.

And dare I say it? A rationalization.

This is like those people who throw around the Jefferson quote about watering the tree of liberty with the blood of patriots and tyrants. But everyone backs away when a Congressperson actually gets shot.

You dare say it, you are correct: It is a rationalization.

And I may say: Zero ***** given.

Don't complain when the next President that you don't vote for is acting like a Fifth Grade bully. The precedent has been set.

Zero ***** given, indeed.

The precedent was set... 8 years ago

I don't recall this level of disrespect from President Obama toward those who hurt his feelings.

This is what I see from the current president.

There's no comparison between the way obama was treated and the way Trump is treated. Was there ever a comparable Stephen Colbert to obama? No.

What can I say? Any President provides a hell of a target, but Trump painted a big red bullseye on his ass.

 

[ricechickie]

They were hired to govern.

Wrong! They were hired to represent their constituents' best interest, not govern.

That is governing.

No, it's not. You know who governs?

Governors.

They are all part of the government.

We have 50 States...you are starting to sound like pogo.

It the United States of America

Not the united state ...


We hate the elite fags of California / new York and the 47% trying to get free stuff.






.

Hate away, if that's what you're good at.

 

[sealybobo]

Except they decided to obstruct everything Obama did.

That's what they were hired to do.

They were hired to govern.

Wrong! They were hired to represent their constituents' best interest, not govern.

That is governing.

No it's not, they were hired to represent their constitutes best interest like Marion posted.


that's why Obama lost 900 plus seats.

We the people didn't want Obama's game.



.
.

Not true. The people who elected Obama twice were just too stupid to show up in 2010&2014 and they didn't vote for Hillary for s

Except they decided to obstruct everything Obama did.

That's what they were hired to do.

They were hired to govern.

Wrong! They were hired to represent their constituents' best interest, not govern.

That is governing.

No it's not, they were hired to represent their constitutes best interest like Marion posted.


that's why Obama lost 900 plus seats.

We the people didn't want Obama's game.



.
.

But he got re elected? This proves many things. Gerrymandering, the people who elected Obama didn't show up for midterms or for Hillary.

I almost wish you guys would have killed Obamacare so all those stupid millions of people would have lost their healthcare. They could only blame themselves...and republicans

 

[Wyatt earp]

In this case, if we go with the 'bull in the china shop' metaphor, we are getting rid of a lot of unnecessary and ugly bric a brac that should have been discarded long ago and making room for a brighter future.

Those of us who elected Trump didn't elect him for his dignified manner, and ability to play the part of the 'perfect politician'. We've had those types for far too long and all it has netted us is crushing debt, regulation, and taxes along with impossible mandates, inefficiency, ineffectiveness, and a sluggish economy that has hurt many millions of Americans.

We didn't want another member of the professional politicians permanent political class. We want somebody who wasn't afraid to do things differently, who wasn't tied to the status quo, who didn't adhere to the principle of 'we've always done it that way.'

Just be careful that he only clears away what YOU want.

Thing is, in this metaphor, bulls don't have a hell of a lot of control.

Yep, sounds like Trump.

Trump once again cleaned up in only 6 months Obama's mess of trying to fundamentally change America into Europe.


.



.

Cool story.

You hate the truth?


.

In those two words you managed to divine my truth-hating.

Excellent abilities.

Do you do children's parties?

Facts confuse you much? Or you want to deny all of Trump's EOs that cancelled out Obama's ?

Trump restored the force


.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Wrong! They were hired to represent their constituents' best interest, not govern.

That is governing.

No, it's not. You know who governs?

Governors.

They are all part of the government.

We have 50 States...you are starting to sound like pogo.

It the United States of America

Not the united state ...


We hate the elite fags of California / new York and the 47% trying to get free stuff.






.

Hate away, if that's what you're good at.

With Trump we got even...

.

 

[Wyatt earp]

That's what they were hired to do.

They were hired to govern.

Wrong! They were hired to represent their constituents' best interest, not govern.

That is governing.

No it's not, they were hired to represent their constitutes best interest like Marion posted.


that's why Obama lost 900 plus seats.

We the people didn't want Obama's game.



.
.

Not true. The people who elected Obama twice were just too stupid to show up in 2010&2014 and they didn't vote for Hillary for s

That's what they were hired to do.

They were hired to govern.

Wrong! They were hired to represent their constituents' best interest, not govern.

That is governing.

No it's not, they were hired to represent their constitutes best interest like Marion posted.


that's why Obama lost 900 plus seats.

We the people didn't want Obama's game.



.
.

But he got re elected? This proves many things. Gerrymandering, the people who elected Obama didn't show up for midterms or for Hillary.

I almost wish you guys would have killed Obamacare so all those stupid millions of people would have lost their healthcare. They could only blame themselves...and republicans

That were not stupid they hated Hillary and secretly wanted Trump to win


.

 

[Foxfyre]

The president of the United States is the most powerful person in the world. The president is the spokesman for democracy and liberty. Isn’t it time we brought back the pomp and circumstance and the sense of awe for that office that we all held? That means everyone in the administration should look and act professionally, especially the presidential. Impressions matter.”

I seldom, if ever, agree with the individual that allegedly wrote those words, but in this case they are spot on.

Yeah, that'd be great, unfortunately, that's not what's needed right now.

What's needed right now is a bull in a china shop.

Pretty sure that's exactly the case right now as well.

What has a bull in a china shop EVER accomplished?

In this case, if we go with the 'bull in the china shop' metaphor, we are getting rid of a lot of unnecessary and ugly bric a brac that should have been discarded long ago and making room for a brighter future.

Those of us who elected Trump didn't elect him for his dignified manner, and ability to play the part of the 'perfect politician'. We've had those types for far too long and all it has netted us is crushing debt, regulation, and taxes along with impossible mandates, inefficiency, ineffectiveness, and a sluggish economy that has hurt many millions of Americans.

We didn't want another member of the professional politicians permanent political class. We want somebody who wasn't afraid to do things differently, who wasn't tied to the status quo, who didn't adhere to the principle of 'we've always done it that way.'

Just be careful that he only clears away what YOU want.

Thing is, in this metaphor, bulls don't have a hell of a lot of control.

Yep, sounds like Trump.

In my metaphor we aren't looking for control. We are looking for leadership. Everybody never gets all they want because we all want different things.

But all Americans of sound mind should want personal and national security, prosperity, opportunity, choice, options, and a way to provide the most basic needs for ourselves and our family.

Those who want a big daddy Santa Claus all powerful government will always be disappointed with somebody like President Trump. Those of us who want liberty and ability to provide for ourselves will appreciate him a lot more.

Evenso there is common ground to be found among those willing to focus on the issues instead of hatred for the President.

 

[Divine Wind]

They were hired to govern.

Wrong! They were hired to represent their constituents' best interest, not govern.

That is governing.

No, it's not. You know who governs?

Governors.

They are all part of the government.

We have 50 States...you are starting to sound like pogo.

It the United States of America

Not the united state ...


We hate the elite fags of California / new York and the 47% trying to get free stuff.






.

Agreed it's the United States. However, when you say "We hate...." you're joining the "United State" mob.

 

[Borillar]

The president of the United States is the most powerful person in the world. The president is the spokesman for democracy and liberty. Isn’t it time we brought back the pomp and circumstance and the sense of awe for that office that we all held? That means everyone in the administration should look and act professionally, especially the presidential. Impressions matter.”

I seldom, if ever, agree with the individual that allegedly wrote those words, but in this case they are spot on.

Yeah, that'd be great, unfortunately, that's not what's needed right now.

What's needed right now is a bull in a china shop.

Pretty sure that's exactly the case right now as well.

What has a bull in a china shop EVER accomplished?

Breaks a lot of dishes, not much else.

 

[Foxfyre]

If Project Veritas was honest press, you'd have a point.

Every video they produce is heavily editorialized and edited, with one agenda- to gather evidence that supports their thesis, and disregard the rest.

The dishonest press is CNN, as Veritas proved. You just don't like that they exposed the party of Fuhrer Soros.

Just CNN? Doubtful. Yes, there's definitely bias, but "Project Veritas" is equally biased. They only attack those politically opposed to the far RW agenda. Where is their expose' on Fox? Russian Television? Breitbart? Infowars?

About | Project Veritas
Founded by James O’Keefe, the mission of Project Veritas is to:

Investigate and expose corruption, dishonesty, self-dealing, waste, fraud, and other misconduct in both public and private institutions in order to achieve a more ethical and transparent society.

Project Veritas is the most effective non-profit on the national scene, period.

We’ve had dozens of successes, many of which are detailed on this site. The pattern is clear:

Project Veritas launches an investigation with the placement of our undercover journalists. The rollout of our findings creates a growing and uncontainable firestorm of press coverage. Corruption is exposed, leaders resign, and organizations are shut down.

We get immediate, measurable and impactful results, and our return on investment is unparalleled.

Project Veritas is a registered 501(c)3 organization. Project Veritas does not advocate specific resolutions to the issues that are raised through its investigations, nor do we encourage others to do so. Our goal is to inform the public of wrongdoing and allow the public to make judgments on the issues.

A noble goal that is belied by the fact that O'Keefe only targets those he opposes, not all "corruption, dishonesty, self-dealing, waste, fraud, and other misconduct in both public and private institutions". Note his top stories and other "investigations": Project Veritas | Investigating and exposing corruption in both public and private institutions.

While I don't like the idea of billionaires like Soros manipulating the American public, I also don't like RW billionaires like the Koch brothers doing the same thing. Does anyone know where O'Keefe gets most of his funding? That can't be cheap.

At least the Koch Brothers emphasis is on public policies based on the principles of individual liberty, limited government, free markets, and peace. Their stated vision, as described in the CATO Institute charter is to create free, open, and civil societies founded on libertarian principles.

Soros' agenda is more socialism, more government control, along with a kind of soft Marxism shrouded in a 'one world government' concept.

President Trump's agenda is far more aligned with the Koch Brothers than it is with Soros.

 

[sealybobo]

They were hired to govern.

Wrong! They were hired to represent their constituents' best interest, not govern.

That is governing.

No it's not, they were hired to represent their constitutes best interest like Marion posted.


that's why Obama lost 900 plus seats.

We the people didn't want Obama's game.



.
.

Not true. The people who elected Obama twice were just too stupid to show up in 2010&2014 and they didn't vote for Hillary for s

They were hired to govern.

Wrong! They were hired to represent their constituents' best interest, not govern.

That is governing.

No it's not, they were hired to represent their constitutes best interest like Marion posted.


that's why Obama lost 900 plus seats.

We the people didn't want Obama's game.



.
.

But he got re elected? This proves many things. Gerrymandering, the people who elected Obama didn't show up for midterms or for Hillary.

I almost wish you guys would have killed Obamacare so all those stupid millions of people would have lost their healthcare. They could only blame themselves...and republicans

That were not stupid they hated Hillary and secretly wanted Trump to win


.

You didn't explain why the people who showed up in 08 and 12 didn't show up in midterms? They must not realize they matter. Now I'm not going to cry when you make cuts to programs for the poor or when Trump tweets about women bleeding. Women and the poor deserve Republicans.

I wish the GOP would pass more legislation that pisses Muslims, women, gays, the poor, seniors and blacks off. They need to see the difference. Unfortunately you guys can't get any of it passed. Amazing. But you guys won big time with your supreme Court nominee. Maybe another one coming up. Lucky astard. The people don't realize how important that was. The Democrats did a horrible job explaining that.

Anyways, **** the masses. They don't vote. Don't vote don't matter

 

[Marion Morrison]

That's what they were hired to do.

They were hired to govern.

Wrong! They were hired to represent their constituents' best interest, not govern.

That is governing.

No it's not, they were hired to represent their constitutes best interest like Marion posted.


that's why Obama lost 900 plus seats.

We the people didn't want Obama's game.



.
.

Not true. The people who elected Obama twice were just too stupid to show up in 2010&2014 and they didn't vote for Hillary for s

That's what they were hired to do.

They were hired to govern.

Wrong! They were hired to represent their constituents' best interest, not govern.

That is governing.

No it's not, they were hired to represent their constitutes best interest like Marion posted.


that's why Obama lost 900 plus seats.

We the people didn't want Obama's game.



.
.

But he got re elected? This proves many things. Gerrymandering, the people who elected Obama didn't show up for midterms or for Hillary.

I almost wish you guys would have killed Obamacare so all those stupid millions of people would have lost their healthcare. They could only blame themselves...and republicans

There was massive voter fraud that year, even though he most likely beat Romney anyway.

Seriously, entire districts without 1 single vote for Romney? Not likely.

 

[Marion Morrison]

If Project Veritas was honest press, you'd have a point.

Every video they produce is heavily editorialized and edited, with one agenda- to gather evidence that supports their thesis, and disregard the rest.

The dishonest press is CNN, as Veritas proved. You just don't like that they exposed the party of Fuhrer Soros.

Just CNN? Doubtful. Yes, there's definitely bias, but "Project Veritas" is equally biased. They only attack those politically opposed to the far RW agenda. Where is their expose' on Fox? Russian Television? Breitbart? Infowars?

About | Project Veritas
Founded by James O’Keefe, the mission of Project Veritas is to:

Investigate and expose corruption, dishonesty, self-dealing, waste, fraud, and other misconduct in both public and private institutions in order to achieve a more ethical and transparent society.

Project Veritas is the most effective non-profit on the national scene, period.

We’ve had dozens of successes, many of which are detailed on this site. The pattern is clear:

Project Veritas launches an investigation with the placement of our undercover journalists. The rollout of our findings creates a growing and uncontainable firestorm of press coverage. Corruption is exposed, leaders resign, and organizations are shut down.

We get immediate, measurable and impactful results, and our return on investment is unparalleled.

Project Veritas is a registered 501(c)3 organization. Project Veritas does not advocate specific resolutions to the issues that are raised through its investigations, nor do we encourage others to do so. Our goal is to inform the public of wrongdoing and allow the public to make judgments on the issues.

A noble goal that is belied by the fact that O'Keefe only targets those he opposes, not all "corruption, dishonesty, self-dealing, waste, fraud, and other misconduct in both public and private institutions". Note his top stories and other "investigations": Project Veritas | Investigating and exposing corruption in both public and private institutions.

While I don't like the idea of billionaires like Soros manipulating the American public, I also don't like RW billionaires like the Koch brothers doing the same thing. Does anyone know where O'Keefe gets most of his funding? That can't be cheap.

At least the Koch Brothers emphasis is on public policies based on the principles of individual liberty, limited government, free markets, and peace. Their stated vision, as described in the CATO Institute charter is to create free, open, and civil societies founded on libertarian principles.

Soros' agenda is more socialism, more government control, along with a kind of soft Marxism shrouded in a 'one world government' concept.

President Trump's agenda is far more aligned with the Koch Brothers than it is with Soros.

The Koch's don't like Trump and refused to support him, except for the outcast black sheep brother.

 

[sealybobo]

They were hired to govern.

Wrong! They were hired to represent their constituents' best interest, not govern.

That is governing.

No it's not, they were hired to represent their constitutes best interest like Marion posted.


that's why Obama lost 900 plus seats.

We the people didn't want Obama's game.



.
.

Not true. The people who elected Obama twice were just too stupid to show up in 2010&2014 and they didn't vote for Hillary for s

They were hired to govern.

Wrong! They were hired to represent their constituents' best interest, not govern.

That is governing.

No it's not, they were hired to represent their constitutes best interest like Marion posted.


that's why Obama lost 900 plus seats.

We the people didn't want Obama's game.



.
.

But he got re elected? This proves many things. Gerrymandering, the people who elected Obama didn't show up for midterms or for Hillary.

I almost wish you guys would have killed Obamacare so all those stupid millions of people would have lost their healthcare. They could only blame themselves...and republicans

There was massive voter fraud that year, even though he most likely beat Romney anyway.

Seriously, entire districts without 1 single vote for Romney? Not likely.

Fake news!

 

[sealybobo]

They were hired to govern.

Wrong! They were hired to represent their constituents' best interest, not govern.

That is governing.

No it's not, they were hired to represent their constitutes best interest like Marion posted.


that's why Obama lost 900 plus seats.

We the people didn't want Obama's game.



.
.

Not true. The people who elected Obama twice were just too stupid to show up in 2010&2014 and they didn't vote for Hillary for s

They were hired to govern.

Wrong! They were hired to represent their constituents' best interest, not govern.

That is governing.

No it's not, they were hired to represent their constitutes best interest like Marion posted.


that's why Obama lost 900 plus seats.

We the people didn't want Obama's game.



.
.

But he got re elected? This proves many things. Gerrymandering, the people who elected Obama didn't show up for midterms or for Hillary.

I almost wish you guys would have killed Obamacare so all those stupid millions of people would have lost their healthcare. They could only blame themselves...and republicans

There was massive voter fraud that year, even though he most likely beat Romney anyway.

Seriously, entire districts without 1 single vote for Romney? Not likely.

That's some pretty effective gerrymandering.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Wrong! They were hired to represent their constituents' best interest, not govern.

That is governing.

No it's not, they were hired to represent their constitutes best interest like Marion posted.


that's why Obama lost 900 plus seats.

We the people didn't want Obama's game.



.
.

Not true. The people who elected Obama twice were just too stupid to show up in 2010&2014 and they didn't vote for Hillary for s

Wrong! They were hired to represent their constituents' best interest, not govern.

That is governing.

No it's not, they were hired to represent their constitutes best interest like Marion posted.


that's why Obama lost 900 plus seats.

We the people didn't want Obama's game.



.
.

But he got re elected? This proves many things. Gerrymandering, the people who elected Obama didn't show up for midterms or for Hillary.

I almost wish you guys would have killed Obamacare so all those stupid millions of people would have lost their healthcare. They could only blame themselves...and republicans

There was massive voter fraud that year, even though he most likely beat Romney anyway.

Seriously, entire districts without 1 single vote for Romney? Not likely.

That's some pretty effective gerrymandering.

No, there was massive election fraud.