Islamic antisemitism is the most dangerous of them all

[LeftofLeft]

Quit trying to change the subject.

The subject hasn’t changed. What also hasn’t changed is you have no valid retort.

 

[JoeB131]

The thread is about the Islamic antisemites in the US. You need to contain your TDS.

Except given that most Muslims are Semitic, I can't see how they are anti-Semitic.

It would probably be better to call them "anti-Zionist" or maybe, if you are going for a stretch, "anti-Jewish". But that doesn't really have the same ring, because those dislikes are political and religious, not racial.

 

[theHawk]

Sure it does. You just don't want to hear those theories.



How are they false gods but your god is totally real.

At one time, Zeus had more worshippers than Yahweh did.

View attachment 1119428



So, um, how are your fables more real than their fables?

You were free to explain how through only science the universe, life, and consciousness had come into existence. Instead all you did was attack the idea of a one true God that created it.

So give us the mathematical equation that can create life out of atomic particles.

Until then, you have nothing.

 

[JoeB131]

You were free to explain how through only science the universe, life, and consciousness had come into existence. Instead all you did was attack the idea of a one true God that created it.

So give us the mathematical equation that can create life out of atomic particles.

Until then, you have nothing.

Look up< "Miller-Urey experiment, which explains how life could have evolved from chemical compounds.

Here's the thing. Science doesn't have ALL the answers. We have a lot more answers than we did 200 years ago.

200 years ago, people didn't know what viruses were. Did that mean viruses didn't exist?

None of this proves your sky pixie (only worshipped by 1/4 of the human race) is the actual sky pixie.

 

[theHawk]

Look up< "Miller-Urey experiment, which explains how life could have evolved from chemical compounds.

Here's the thing. Science doesn't have ALL the answers. We have a lot more answers than we did 200 years ago.

200 years ago, people didn't know what viruses were. Did that mean viruses didn't exist?

None of this proves your sky pixie (only worshipped by 1/4 of the human race) is the actual sky pixie.

LOL thanks for proving my point.

A chemical reaction to create “amino acids” is not creating life.

“Organic compounds” are just atomic material. Like carbon, and water.

So the BEST you have is a chemical reaction that created some compounds, and this is somehow magically going to turn into a life form naturally? There is ZERO scientific basis to make that claim. Science requires observing the action and replicating it.

So indeed science has NO a answers for the creation of life.

Thus, YOU are the one that believes in fables.


God the creator has been logically proven by historical events and the scriptures which are historical accounts of those events. Events that cannot be explained by natural science. Like prophets being able to tell of events yet to happen, and that come true.

 

[JoeB131]

LOL thanks for proving my point.

A chemical reaction to create “amino acids” is not creating life.

“Organic compounds” are just atomic material. Like carbon, and water.

So the BEST you have is a chemical reaction that created some compounds, and this is somehow magically going to turn into a life form naturally? There is ZERO scientific basis to make that claim. Science requires observing the action and replicating it.

So indeed science has NO a answers for the creation of life.

Sure they do, not just one you like. you want to believe it's a magic sky pixie 6000 years ago, even though we know the universe to be much bigger and older than that.

God the creator has been logically proven by historical events and the scriptures which are historical accounts of those events. Events that cannot be explained by natural science. Like prophets being able to tell of events yet to happen, and that come true.

Wait, was that the talking snake or the giant?

 

[theHawk]

Sure they do, not just one you like. you want to believe it's a magic sky pixie 6000 years ago, even though we know the universe to be much bigger and older than that.



Wait, was that the talking snake or the giant?

You keep flapping your gums, but you haven’t shown us how life can be created through science.

Amino acids cannot self replicate and are not life.

 

[JoeB131]

You keep flapping your gums, but you haven’t shown us how life can be created through science.

Amino acids cannot self replicate and are not life.

No, but life is made up of amino acids, that's the point.

 

[theHawk]

No, but life is made up of amino acids, that's the point.

And you still can’t show how that happens through natural scientific means.


Checkmate.