ISIS Syrian Stronghold Liberated By Obama-Clinton: Sarcastic Trump Opposed To That, Most Likely!

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Trump campaign supporters claiming the Obama-Clinton are the climate founders of ISIS, from 2004 and 2006 when Bush-Cheney was in office: Now have to deal with a less sarcastic new event about ISIS. An important ISIS Syrian territorial monument has fallen to the forces of the current administration.

Women rip off their burqas as Syrian residents of Manbij celebrate rescue from Isil

The environment has everywhere changed, about ISIS.

Mainly ISIS and the Trump-loons create environments on Social Media. Their brand of insanity is clearly far-reaching. They are masters of lunacy, everyday!

Less so it is--for both lunatic fringe groups, based on recent events and based on the current ground game, in opposition to the two referenced lunatic fringe-groups.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!'
(Ground game effective against other yellow-hair, White Eyes, even: Who had attacked indigenous peoples at Little Big Horn!)

Raqqa was liberated?

 

[mascale]

Manbij appears to be the actual spelling. The Lunatic Fringe Republicans have their Social Media Monster. ISIS has so many of them that social media can't keep track of them all.

Before social media, the Reagan Administration would every year claim to have never heard of Osama bin laden, citing previous year denials of having ever heard of Osama bin laden. How would anyone believe that someone could have heard of someone they had already denied--time and time again--having heard of(?)!

US Mideast Policy has always been simple, and clear(?)!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Anyone sees that there is never a good atomic cannon around, when you need one: Even right there in Peoria!" Ask on Lands of Many Nations(?)!)

 

[P@triot]

Here is former DIA Director General Michael Flynn on video admitting that the Obama Administration armed ISIS to overthrow the governments in the Middle East (Egypt, Libya, Syria, etc.).

Mehdi Hasan: [INTERRUPTING] But hold on, you were helping them in 2012. While these groups are -

Michael Flynn: Yeah, we've allowed this, we've allowed this extremist, you know, these extremist militants to come in and -

Mehdi Hasan: [INTERRUPTING] But why did you allow them to do that, General? You were in post. You were the head of the Defence Intelligence Agency.

Michael Flynn: [TALKING OVER] Well, those are – those are – yeah, right, right. Well those are – those are policy – those are policy issues, yeah.

Mehdi Hasan: [TALKING OVER] I took the liberty – I took the liberty of printing out that document. This is the memo I quoted from. Did you see this document in 2012? Would this come across your table, one of your analysts wrote -

Michael Flynn: [TALKING OVER] Oh yeah, yeah, I paid very close attention to all those, sure.

Mehdi Hasan: [TALKING OVER] OK, So when you saw this, did you not pick up a phone and say, "What on earth are we doing supporting these Syrian rebels who are -"?

Michael Flynn: [TALKING OVER] Sure. That, that kind of information is presented and those become -

Mehdi Hasan: [INTERRUPTING] And what did you do about it?

Michael Flynn: Those become – those become – I argued about it.

Mehdi Hasan: Did you say, "We shouldn't be supporting these groups"?

Michael Flynn: I did. I mean, we argued about these, the different groups that were there and we said, you know, "Who is that is involved here?" and I will tell you that I, I do believe that the, the intelligence was very clear, and now it's a matter of whether or not policy is going to be as clear and as defining and as precise as it needs to be, and I don’t believe it was.

Michael Flynn: [TALKING OVER] – we kicked that can, Mehdi.

Mehdi Hasan: But three – we're not – but three years ago, let's just be clear for the sake of our viewers. In 2012, your agency was saying, quote: "The Salafists, the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaeda in Iraq are the major forces driving the insurgence in Syria." In 2012, the US was helping coordinate arms transfers to those same groups. Why did you not stop that, if you're worried about the rise of quote, unquote, "Islamic extremism"?

Michael Flynn: [TALKING OVER] Yeah, I, I mean, I hate to say it's not my job but that – my job was to ensure that the accuracy of our intelligence that was being presented was as good as it could be, and I will tell you, it goes before 2012. I mean, when we were, when we were in Iraq and we still had decisions to be made before there was a decision to pull out of Iraq in 2011. I mean, it was very clear what we were, what we were going to face.

Mehdi Hasan: Well, I admire your frankness on this subject.

Michael Flynn: [TALKING OVER] Very clear what we were gonna face.

Mehdi Hasan: Let me – let me just to, before we move on, just to clarify once more, you are basically saying that even in government at the time, you knew those groups were around. You saw this analysis -

Michael Flynn: [TALKING OVER] Sure.

Mehdi Hasan: - and you were arguing against it. But who wasn’t listening?

Michael Flynn: I think the administration.

Mehdi Hasan: So the administration turned a blind eye to your analysis -

Michael Flynn: I don’t know if they turned a blind eye. I think it was a decision. I think it was a wilful decision.

Mehdi Hasan: A wilful decision to go – support an insurgency that had Salafist, al-Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood?

Michael Flynn: [INTERRUPTING] Well, a wilful decision to do what they're doing, which, which you have to really – you have to really ask the President, what is it that he actually is doing with the, with the policy that is in place, because it is very, very confusing? I’m sitting here today, Mehdi, and I don’t, I can’t tell you exactly what that is, and I've been at this for a long time.

Transcript: Michael Flynn on ISIL

 

[P@triot]

And the hits just keep on coming!!! Not only is former DIA director Michael Flynn on video admitting that the Obama Administration was arming the terrorist groups that eventually formed ISIS, but now even the leader of Hezbollah has come out and corroborated those facts. And then of course - there are the WikiLeaks e-mails from the State Department which also corroborates all of it. But come on liberals - keep telling us all how it's just one big "lie" and that Obama is out there actually trying to "kill" ISIS.

Hezbollah Leader Says Trump’s Claim That Obama ‘Founded’ Islamic State ‘Based on Facts’

 

[mascale]

In the actual 2012 time frame, President Obama was admitting the Administration mistake about underestimating ISIS, on "60 minutes" in 2012. Even any reference to the a dubious leader of Hezbollah credits the Administration: Only for creating the Islamic State. The core ISIS off-shoot had already happened years before, and was underestimated.

Now, anyone should pay attention to the core understanding of the thread herein created: The Obama Administration underestimated ISIS in the same manner that the Republicans and press corps underestimated Donald Trump. See below a corroboration, from Obama admitting to the underestimating of the atrocity the Shia government of Iraq was possibly creating for Sunni in Iraq, and elsewhere--possibly allied with ancient Persia.
________________________________________
President Barack Obama admitted that U.S. intelligence underestimated the Islamic State's emergence in Syria, and that breaking up the terrorist cell will be a complicated battle involving both military and political action.

The president spoke about the multi-national effort against ISIS in a televised interview with 60 Minutes, which aired Sunday night.

Citing earlier comments by James Clapper, director of national intelligence, Mr Obama acknowledged that U.S. intelligence didn't take seriously enough what had been taking place in Syria.

'Well I think, our head of the intelligence community, Jim Clapper, has acknowledged that I think they underestimated what had been taking place in Syria,' Mr Obama said.

Conversely, the United States overestimated the ability of the Iraqi army to fight the militant groups, Obama said in the interview taped on Friday, days after the president made his case at the United Nations for action.
__________________________________
Now, in 2016, it is not the Founder of ISIS who is engaged in its destruction. It is President Obama, backing a coalition of Indigenous peoples in the region. The Shia government of Iraq was not at assimilating Sunni. Sadaam Hussein had managed to create a Sunni government, for example, more given to Socialism than to sectarian differences. The Shia government made no attempt to reinvent itself at all. It had no support in Sunni areas of Iraq.

Enter the newly armed, and internet connected, Sunni based ISIS factions. 90,000 to 200,000 tweets per day, appealing to the disaffected Sunni, made for an easy land-grab. Against who? The Iraqi army was reluctant to get involved.

There is nothing about founding anything in Iraq, other than a takeover--by a secular army--of actual Moslems engaged in sectarian disputes as usual.

Trump could take over a significant voting bloc, registered GOP, off radar of any of the elected Republican candidates for the nomination.

The atrocities are glaring, even as both tales are unfolding. The Moslems are happy to see the secular-militant, Islamic State gone. Democrats, Republicans, and Independents are sounding out the possible election of Hillary Clinton, in opposition to the social media tweeting, and capable of using, Donald Trump campaign.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(RNC not founders, even, of ancestral Lands of Many Nations--Reservations(?), though they may claim!)