Indeependent
Diamond Member
- Nov 19, 2013
- 73,633
- 28,511
- 2,250
The Irony!Fuck off you ignorant hate filled lump.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Irony!Fuck off you ignorant hate filled lump.
There is nearly zero communication on this message board. It's a reflection of where we are as a country.That's okay. It's one helluva good place for observation, even if trying to communicate with them is pointless
Agreed completely. This place is a mirror in many ways. Sadly.There is nearly zero communication on this message board. It's a reflection of where we are as a country.
There is no communication with an ideologue.There is nearly zero communication on this message board. It's a reflection of where we are as a country.
I saw you in another thread talking about facts. And when you got presented with them, you flodged out like a little bitch.Perhaps most Dem sympathizers are just alienated by the total lack of debate quality on this forum, which is in large parts dominated by mindless Trump puppets, Russian propaganda bots and other retards who couldn't even correctly define words like "Constitution", "freedom" or "democracy", even if their lifes depended on it.
It is a tragedy that these mentally ill LibTards are allowed to vote.I saw you in another thread talking about facts. And when you got presented with them, you flodged out like a little bitch.
Ironic post is.................. Ironic
Libertarianism is a false flag game. It is based on Ayn Rand and her ideology, and sounds good to the few until they need the help of the many. Our democracy is on the defense, and anyone who has listened to Sen. Johnson's or Sen. Rand's comments are examples of Callous Conservatives.Well, Rye Catcher . . . I'm more libertarian that conservative. In fact, I'm just Libertarian. But, as of right now, the GOP/Conservatives are far closer to the Libertarian ideals than the liberals/ leftists, whatever you want to call them. Not hard, now that the left have gone full on fascist, and dropped any pretense of their former ideals.
But, I'll say this to you and all other liberals on here: I respect you for being on this forum when you are not in control of it, and cannot simply cry to the mods to have people banned when they point out the flaws in your arguments.
That tells me you at least are not terrified of differing opinions. That brings you one step away from your fellow liberals. In what direction, I can't say, but any step away from that set is a step in the right direction. It certainly sets you apart, and I applaud you for it.
![]()
Clearly, you don’t have handle on the meaning of “callous.”Libertarianism is a false flag game. It is based on Ayn Rand and her ideology, and sounds good to the few until they need the help of the many. Our democracy is on the defense, and anyone who has listened to Sen. Johnson's or Sen. Rand's comments are examples of Callous Conservatives.
It sound goods to the biddable people who are healthy, wealthy and not aged, infirm, and those who work and their pay check does not allow for putting money aside for their kids or in retirement.
The first sentence in the Libertarian Platform speaks to the Callous Conservatism, to wit:
"As Libertarians, we seek a world of liberty: a world in which all individuals are sovereign over their own lives and are not forced to sacrifice their values for the benefit of others."
I agree with RC regarding Libertarianism.Clearly, you don’t have handle on the meaning of “callous.”
Good for you, and I mean that sincerely. Wish there was more of ya! You are a dying breed for sure.
Thanks. Not sure most would agree.![]()
As he is prone to do, he overgeneralizes. Not just about Libertarianism as a political theory, but about so many other things.I agree with RC regarding Libertarianism.
Nicely statedJets, I can agree to disagree with anyone, and in my mind, that doesn't make them bad or 14 other insidious names people tend to call other people on here. I do not know how you perceive it, but someone can make a very good point, then they throw it out the window by calling someone everything but an American, and swearing like he**. It almost makes me want to root for the other person, lol. One thing is for sure; it doesn't help get their point across, but magically, some people believe that it does!
"False flag," meaning that it purports to stand for something, but actually has a hidden agenda. I look forward to reading you backing up that claim.Libertarianism is a false flag game.
No.It is based on Ayn Rand and her ideology,
Such as? What are the two or three most callous comments that Johnson and Rand have made?and sounds good to the few until they need the help of the many. Our democracy is on the defense, and anyone who has listened to Sen. Johnson's or Sen. Rand's comments are examples of Callous Conservatives.
Before government decided to play Santa with other people's money, the aged, and infirm were taken care of by family and community.It sound goods to the biddable people who are healthy, wealthy and not aged, infirm, and those who work and their pay check does not allow for putting money aside for their kids or in retirement.
What part of that is "callous?" Liberty? Individual sovereignty? Own lives? Not forced?The first sentence in the Libertarian Platform speaks to the Callous Conservatism, to wit:
"As Libertarians, we seek a world of liberty: a world in which all individuals are sovereign over their own lives and are not forced to sacrifice their values for the benefit of others."
Nice try, we can disagree emphatically, but the facts on civil rights, and equal rights, equal opportunities and equal justice are goals of the liberals, progressives and most Democrats."False flag," meaning that it purports to stand for something, but actually has a hidden agenda. I look forward to reading you backing up that claim.
No.
Libertarianism pre-dates Rand and it will live long after the left has managed to put her and her works down the memory hole. Rand was a pro-capitalist, immigrant American patriot, not a libertarian. Her books decry the evils of socialism and bureaucracy and are quite prescient about modern times, though written in the fifties. But she does not advocate libertarianism.
Such as? What are the two or three most callous comments that Johnson and Rand have made?
Before government decided to play Santa with other people's money, the aged, and infirm were taken care of by family and community.
What part of that is "callous?" Liberty? Individual sovereignty? Own lives? Not forced?
I suspect it is that lack of force that you object to. You fear that, in the absence of force, producers would not choose to support you non-producers in the lifestyle to which you would like to become accustomed. You are very correct about that. Take pipeline workers, for example.
Pipeline workers, start as unskilled labor, but with relatively high compensation. That high compensation is due to the fact that they must work long hours outdoors, often in harsh weather conditions, while separated from family and civilization. With persistence and willingness to learn, they can work up to six figures with no college at all.
No, such a person would not want to support you as you spend eight years living on student loan welfare changing majors with the latest trends in liberal thought. When you finally finish your useless degree, they don't want to pay you a universal basic income, while you "find yourself," or join ANTIFA.
Not that they can anyway, at this point. Biden ended their pipeline jobs on inauguration day, and is now perplexed at the rising price of gasoline.
I'd love to hear your justification for specifically taxing such a person so that you can sleep until noon, except on the day that the latest edition of GTA comes out. Then explain how they will pay those taxes without jobs.
Also, you forgot to support you claim that Libertarianism is a false flag game.
Perhaps that is the goal. The method to achieve it is to rob earners of their earnings and to rob free people of their freedom. They have been doing that in earnest for about fifty years now, with little advancement of those goals. Which makes one wonder whether the taking of earnings and ending of liberty are actually the true goals and the lofty ideals quoted are - you know - false flags.Nice try, we can disagree emphatically, but the facts on civil rights, and equal rights, equal opportunities and equal justice are goals of the liberals, progressives and most Democrats.
What?As to the false flag comment, noted in italics, is used metaphorically.
There are videos on YouTube where Rand states that handicapped people are worthless; I’ve seen these videos."False flag," meaning that it purports to stand for something, but actually has a hidden agenda. I look forward to reading you backing up that claim.
No.
Libertarianism pre-dates Rand and it will live long after the left has managed to put her and her works down the memory hole. Rand was a pro-capitalist, immigrant American patriot, not a libertarian. Her books decry the evils of socialism and bureaucracy and are quite prescient about modern times, though written in the fifties. But she does not advocate libertarianism.
Such as? What are the two or three most callous comments that Johnson and Rand have made?
Before government decided to play Santa with other people's money, the aged, and infirm were taken care of by family and community.
What part of that is "callous?" Liberty? Individual sovereignty? Own lives? Not forced?
I suspect it is that lack of force that you object to. You fear that, in the absence of force, producers would not choose to support you non-producers in the lifestyle to which you would like to become accustomed. You are very correct about that. Take pipeline workers, for example.
Pipeline workers, start as unskilled labor, but with relatively high compensation. That high compensation is due to the fact that they must work long hours outdoors, often in harsh weather conditions, while separated from family and civilization. With persistence and willingness to learn, they can work up to six figures with no college at all.
No, such a person would not want to support you as you spend eight years living on student loan welfare changing majors with the latest trends in liberal thought. When you finally finish your useless degree, they don't want to pay you a universal basic income, while you "find yourself," or join ANTIFA.
Not that they can anyway, at this point. Biden ended their pipeline jobs on inauguration day, and is now perplexed at the rising price of gasoline.
I'd love to hear your justification for specifically taxing such a person so that you can sleep until noon, except on the day that the latest edition of GTA comes out. Then explain how they will pay those taxes without jobs.
Also, you forgot to support you claim that Libertarianism is a false flag game.
There is nearly zero communication on this message board. It's a reflection of where we are as a country.
While we may lack quantity of liberals, the liberals we have are of the highest quality, the most liberal, that could be found so what they lack in body count they make up for in stupidity.Or is the current administration and congress so difficult to defend that the liberals are waiting for the GOP to win, so they can go back to being the vocal critics?
Nothing wrong with that, I'm just wondering. I like it when liberals defend the indefensible.
Mods, if this should be in feedback, feel free to move it. It's a question about the board combined with politics, so I thought if I put it in feedback, it might get moved here.