Is this how leftists practice being peaceful?

[BackAgain]

https://go.citizen.com/c5gGsUHXJWb

Killing Charlie Kirk wasn’t enough?

Now (maybe?) dangerous materials sent to TPUSA ahead of the Charlie Kirk funeral?

Needless to say, this story needs to be followed.

 

[progressive hunter]

https://go.citizen.com/c5gGsUHXJWb

Killing Charlie Kirk wasn’t enough?

Now (maybe?) dangerous materials sent to TPUSA ahead of the Charlie Kirk funeral?

Needless to say, this story needs to be followed.

BREAKING VIDEO – Bomb tech at TPUSA over suspicious package – The Right Scoop

therightscoop.com

 

[Darkwind]

BREAKING VIDEO – Bomb tech at TPUSA over suspicious package – The Right Scoop

therightscoop.com

We didn't really think the left would stop with Charlie Kirk, did we?

 

[White 6]

https://go.citizen.com/c5gGsUHXJWb

Killing Charlie Kirk wasn’t enough?

Now (maybe?) dangerous materials sent to TPUSA ahead of the Charlie Kirk funeral?

Needless to say, this story needs to be followed.

I thought he was killed by one guy. Are there charges being brought by multiple people or do they have the guy, most likely responsible? Isn't anybody responsible for what they do, individually. What if some murderer claims membership of some group of poor unfortunate downtrodden. Are they responsible, or do we blame the individual and punish accordingly. If you cannot prosecute lefts for the murder, simply because they were not involved, should he be released, or trial delayed, until you can get those responsible?

 

[BackAgain]

BREAKING VIDEO – Bomb tech at TPUSA over suspicious package – The Right Scoop

therightscoop.com

The outcome was indeed good news.

Thanks for providing that update.

 

[BackAgain]

I thought he was killed by one guy. Are there charges being brought by multiple people or do they have the guy, most likely responsible? Isn't anybody responsible for what they do, individually. What if some murderer claims membership of some group of poor unfortunate downtrodden. Are they responsible, or do we blame the individual and punish accordingly. If you cannot prosecute lefts for the murder, simply because they were not involved, should he be released, or trial delayed, until you can get those responsible?

Codefendants don’t always need to get prosecuted at the same trial.

 

[White 6]

Codefendants don’t always need to get prosecuted at the same trial.

I simply do not know what the charge would actually be, and if it is a state statute or a federal statute. I do not remember right-wing rabble rousers prosecuted after the Gabby Giffords shooting, or fiery preachers prosecuted after abortion clinic violence, murders, bombing, etc. Are right-wingers not actually directly involved in the murders of Democrat Minnesota state representative Melissa Hortman and her husband, fatally shot at their home, while state senator John Hoffman and his wife were also attacked but survived. Are there new laws, I am unaware of? Am I missing something here?

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Muh free speech

 

[BackAgain]

I simply do not know what the charge would actually be,

If a defendant is alleged to have been an accomplice of (say) the primary actor, depending on the jurisdiction, the charge might be “accomplice after the fact.”

Suppose the prosecution and law enforcement are able to establish that they had previously coordinated on how to distract the inevitable search for the shooter. (I have no way of knowing if they did so; or how it might be shown, assuming they did conspire together on that matter prior to the murder.).

But it would be the obligation of the prosecution to present any such evidence so that they could demonstrate the commonality of the behavior of the two defendants. Same goal. Same objective. Same plan.

If that could be established by credible evidence to the unanimous satisfaction of the trial jury (or juries), each would then be convicted for that planned crime. The accomplice would be (in the eyes of the law) just as guilty as the shooter.

and if it is a state statute or a federal statute. I do not remember right-wing rabble rousers prosecuted after the Gabby Giffords shooting, or fiery preachers prosecuted after abortion clinic violence, murders, bombing, etc. Are right-wingers not actually directly involved in the murders of Democrat Minnesota state representative Melissa Hortman and her husband, fatally shot at their home, while state senator John Hoffman and his wife were also attacked but survived. Are there new laws, I am unaware of? Am I missing something here?

It isn’t sufficient to rabble rouse after the fact to cheer on the murderer. That’s just imbecility, not criminality.

 

[White 6]

If a defendant is alleged to have been an accomplice of (say) the primary actor, depending on the jurisdiction, the charge might be “accomplice after the fact.”

Suppose the prosecution and law enforcement are able to establish that they had previously coordinated on how to distract the inevitable search for the shooter. (I have no way of knowing if they did so; or how it might be shown, assuming they did conspire together on that matter prior to the murder.).

But it would be the obligation of the prosecution to present any such evidence so that they could demonstrate the commonality of the behavior of the two defendants. Same goal. Same objective. Same plan.

If that could be established by credible evidence to the unanimous satisfaction of the trial jury (or juries), each would then be convicted for that planned crime. The accomplice would be (in the eyes of the law) just as guilty as the shooter.

It isn’t sufficient to rabble rouse after the fact to cheer on the murderer. That’s just imbecility, not criminality.

That sounds normal, but not what it sounds like is wanted. It sounds like people want somebody to go after people on the left, basically just for being assholes on the left. It is very true, there are true asshole on the radical left, just as true assholes on the radical right, but linking them directly to this crime, is quite a bit like trying to charge 2A supporter because a gun was used. Not happening.

 

[BackAgain]

That sounds normal, but not what it sounds like is wanted. It sounds like people want somebody to go after people on the left, basically just for being assholes on the left. It is very true, there are true asshole on the radical left, just as true assholes on the radical right, but linking them directly to this crime, is quite a bit like trying to charge 2A supporter because a gun was used. Not happening.

I don’t know exactly what you’re talking about.

A little inflamed rhetoric aside, most conservatives no more want “leftists” (as a group) to be denied the protections of our 1st Amendment than they’d want their own protections to be curtailed just because of their own “rightist” political persuasion.

 

[MarathonMike]

I thought he was killed by one guy. Are there charges being brought by multiple people or do they have the guy, most likely responsible? Isn't anybody responsible for what they do, individually. What if some murderer claims membership of some group of poor unfortunate downtrodden. Are they responsible, or do we blame the individual and punish accordingly. If you cannot prosecute lefts for the murder, simply because they were not involved, should he be released, or trial delayed, until you can get those responsible?

It's way too early to claim he was a pure "lone wolf". I personally find it hard to believe that a 22 year old kid with apparently no training or history with shooting is going to cooly and calmly execute Charlie Kirk from 200 yards away with one shot.

 

[White 6]

It's way too early to claim he was a pure "lone wolf". I personally find it hard to believe that a 22 year old kid with apparently no training or history with shooting is going to cooly and calmly execute Charlie Kirk from 200 yards away with one shot.

Not early at all, since no links have even be hinted at by that state government, nor the Feds. Hard to gin up much interest or even anxiety, with nobody that has the evidence or investigative power even talking of any clues, that might suggest it. You don't hang out on the conspiracy sites, do you, Mike?

 

[Thinker101]

Muh free speech
View attachment 1163167View attachment 1163168

Interesting, 41 people have donated a total of $1,500. Time to follow the money.

 

[MarathonMike]

Not early at all, since no links have even be hinted at by that state government, nor the Feds. Hard to gin up much interest or even anxiety, with nobody that has the evidence or investigative power even talking of any clues, that might suggest it. You don't hang out on the conspiracy sites, do you, Mike?

No I just listen to Kash Patel who says the FBI is currently interviewing multiple contacts of Robinson through Discord and other Social Media platforms. It will take weeks to get the big picture on the assassin. The text exchange between him and his "lover" stinks to high heaven. And no, I don't pour over the internet to cherry pick videos or conspiracy sites like IM2 and the Left Wingers all do. I enjoy my retirement.