Is this fair?

[Roudy]

In the video she also mentioned a law against posting on social media, wonder if she's actually talking about this one:

Palestinian Authority shows its ‘authoritarian’ face through Cyber Crimes Law

The above law being passed by the PA and Abbas, NOT Israel.

Most of her claims were made up shit.

 

[Roudy]

Israel moves to close Al Jazeera, ban its journalists

And so did most Arab nations. Doy!

 

[abi]

Well, our high holies are over and I have read through the responses. I guess they fall in line with what I expected.

It is sad because open and honest discussion does not seem possible here.

 

[teddyearp]

Abi, I am curious. What do you consider honest and fair? Do you think every reply in this thread to have lacked honesty and fairness?

Or do you think that an honest and fair discussion is to demonize one side or the other?

 

[P F Tinmore]

In the video she also mentioned a law against posting on social media, wonder if she's actually talking about this one:

Palestinian Authority shows its ‘authoritarian’ face through Cyber Crimes Law

The above law being passed by the PA and Abbas, NOT Israel.

 

[rylah]

In the video she also mentioned a law against posting on social media, wonder if she's actually talking about this one:

Palestinian Authority shows its ‘authoritarian’ face through Cyber Crimes Law

The above law being passed by the PA and Abbas, NOT Israel.

How cute, so 35 seconds of video are enough to tell the whole story?
So to be fair let's look further into the facts of the case:

1. Dareen is an Israeli citizen
2.
On October 11, 2015 she was arrested by the Israeli police in a pre-dawn raid on her home. In November 2, 2015 she was indicted for incitement to violence and for support of a terrorist organization.

At the center of the indictment is a poem that she published in YouTube and Facebook titled "Qawem Ya Shaabi Qawemahum" (Resist my people, resist them). A full translation of the poem as made by a police officer is cited in the indictment document.
The rest of the indictment relates to 3 Facebook publication:
(1) Posting the picture of Israa Abed, a women from Nazareth, laid on the ground of the central bus station in Afula after she was shot by Israeli soldiers and guards.
(2) A profile picture with the Arabic writing "Ana Al-Shahid Al-Jay" (I am the next martyr),
(3) A post citing the call by Islamic Jihad for Intifada in the West Bank and calling for Intifada inside the green line for the Al-Aqsa Mosque.

So those 35 seconds of video are, as usual, an appeal to emotion - only.
She supported the Youth "intifada of knifes" aka stabbing passing Israeli citizens as a political struggle, and supported riots on the Temple Mount/Al-Aqsa mosque.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So to be fair, just out of curiosity...
What would happen to a US citizen who openly supported murder of civillians, during a violent uprising taking place?

 

[P F Tinmore]

In the video she also mentioned a law against posting on social media, wonder if she's actually talking about this one:

Palestinian Authority shows its ‘authoritarian’ face through Cyber Crimes Law

The above law being passed by the PA and Abbas, NOT Israel.

How cute, so 35 seconds of video are enough to tell the whole story?
So to be fair let's look further into the facts of the case:

1. Dareen is an Israeli citizen
2.
On October 11, 2015 she was arrested by the Israeli police in a pre-dawn raid on her home. In November 2, 2015 she was indicted for incitement to violence and for support of a terrorist organization.

At the center of the indictment is a poem that she published in YouTube and Facebook titled "Qawem Ya Shaabi Qawemahum" (Resist my people, resist them). A full translation of the poem as made by a police officer is cited in the indictment document.
The rest of the indictment relates to 3 Facebook publication:
(1) Posting the picture of Israa Abed, a women from Nazareth, laid on the ground of the central bus station in Afula after she was shot by Israeli soldiers and guards.
(2) A profile picture with the Arabic writing "Ana Al-Shahid Al-Jay" (I am the next martyr),
(3) A post citing the call by Islamic Jihad for Intifada in the West Bank and calling for Intifada inside the green line for the Al-Aqsa Mosque.

So those 35 seconds of video are, as usual, an appeal to emotion - only.
She supported the Youth "intifada of knifes" aka stabbing passing Israeli citizens as a political struggle, and supported riots on the Temple Mount/Al-Aqsa mosque.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So to be fair, just out of curiosity...
What would happen to a US citizen who openly supported murder of civillians, during a violent uprising taking place?

she was indicted for incitement to violence and for support of a terrorist organization.

Israel's standard stupid excuse.

 

[teddyearp]

Just an honest reply to your standard stupid pretzel making.

 

[rylah]

In the video she also mentioned a law against posting on social media, wonder if she's actually talking about this one:

Palestinian Authority shows its ‘authoritarian’ face through Cyber Crimes Law

The above law being passed by the PA and Abbas, NOT Israel.

How cute, so 35 seconds of video are enough to tell the whole story?
So to be fair let's look further into the facts of the case:

1. Dareen is an Israeli citizen
2.
On October 11, 2015 she was arrested by the Israeli police in a pre-dawn raid on her home. In November 2, 2015 she was indicted for incitement to violence and for support of a terrorist organization.

At the center of the indictment is a poem that she published in YouTube and Facebook titled "Qawem Ya Shaabi Qawemahum" (Resist my people, resist them). A full translation of the poem as made by a police officer is cited in the indictment document.
The rest of the indictment relates to 3 Facebook publication:
(1) Posting the picture of Israa Abed, a women from Nazareth, laid on the ground of the central bus station in Afula after she was shot by Israeli soldiers and guards.
(2) A profile picture with the Arabic writing "Ana Al-Shahid Al-Jay" (I am the next martyr),
(3) A post citing the call by Islamic Jihad for Intifada in the West Bank and calling for Intifada inside the green line for the Al-Aqsa Mosque.

So those 35 seconds of video are, as usual, an appeal to emotion - only.
She supported the Youth "intifada of knifes" aka stabbing passing Israeli citizens as a political struggle, and supported riots on the Temple Mount/Al-Aqsa mosque.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So to be fair, just out of curiosity...
What would happen to a US citizen who openly supported murder of civillians, during a violent uprising taking place?

she was indicted for incitement to violence and for support of a terrorist organization.

Israel's standard stupid excuse.

Another one of Your famous legal opinions.

Incitment to violence is a "stupid excuse"?

In criminal law, incitement is the encouragement of another person to commit a crime. Depending on the jurisdiction, some or all types of incitement may be illegal. Where illegal, it is known as an inchoate offense, where harm is intended but may or may not have actually occurred.

Incitement - Wikipedia

 

[P F Tinmore]

In the video she also mentioned a law against posting on social media, wonder if she's actually talking about this one:

Palestinian Authority shows its ‘authoritarian’ face through Cyber Crimes Law

The above law being passed by the PA and Abbas, NOT Israel.

How cute, so 35 seconds of video are enough to tell the whole story?
So to be fair let's look further into the facts of the case:

1. Dareen is an Israeli citizen
2.
On October 11, 2015 she was arrested by the Israeli police in a pre-dawn raid on her home. In November 2, 2015 she was indicted for incitement to violence and for support of a terrorist organization.

At the center of the indictment is a poem that she published in YouTube and Facebook titled "Qawem Ya Shaabi Qawemahum" (Resist my people, resist them). A full translation of the poem as made by a police officer is cited in the indictment document.
The rest of the indictment relates to 3 Facebook publication:
(1) Posting the picture of Israa Abed, a women from Nazareth, laid on the ground of the central bus station in Afula after she was shot by Israeli soldiers and guards.
(2) A profile picture with the Arabic writing "Ana Al-Shahid Al-Jay" (I am the next martyr),
(3) A post citing the call by Islamic Jihad for Intifada in the West Bank and calling for Intifada inside the green line for the Al-Aqsa Mosque.

So those 35 seconds of video are, as usual, an appeal to emotion - only.
She supported the Youth "intifada of knifes" aka stabbing passing Israeli citizens as a political struggle, and supported riots on the Temple Mount/Al-Aqsa mosque.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So to be fair, just out of curiosity...
What would happen to a US citizen who openly supported murder of civillians, during a violent uprising taking place?

she was indicted for incitement to violence and for support of a terrorist organization.

Israel's standard stupid excuse.

Another one of Your famous legal opinions.

Incitment to violence is a "stupid excuse"?

In criminal law, incitement is the encouragement of another person to commit a crime. Depending on the jurisdiction, some or all types of incitement may be illegal. Where illegal, it is known as an inchoate offense, where harm is intended but may or may not have actually occurred.

Incitement - Wikipedia

Since when has Israel ever given a rat's ass about any law?

 

[Hollie]

In the video she also mentioned a law against posting on social media, wonder if she's actually talking about this one:

Palestinian Authority shows its ‘authoritarian’ face through Cyber Crimes Law

The above law being passed by the PA and Abbas, NOT Israel.

How cute, so 35 seconds of video are enough to tell the whole story?
So to be fair let's look further into the facts of the case:

1. Dareen is an Israeli citizen
2.
On October 11, 2015 she was arrested by the Israeli police in a pre-dawn raid on her home. In November 2, 2015 she was indicted for incitement to violence and for support of a terrorist organization.

At the center of the indictment is a poem that she published in YouTube and Facebook titled "Qawem Ya Shaabi Qawemahum" (Resist my people, resist them). A full translation of the poem as made by a police officer is cited in the indictment document.
The rest of the indictment relates to 3 Facebook publication:
(1) Posting the picture of Israa Abed, a women from Nazareth, laid on the ground of the central bus station in Afula after she was shot by Israeli soldiers and guards.
(2) A profile picture with the Arabic writing "Ana Al-Shahid Al-Jay" (I am the next martyr),
(3) A post citing the call by Islamic Jihad for Intifada in the West Bank and calling for Intifada inside the green line for the Al-Aqsa Mosque.

So those 35 seconds of video are, as usual, an appeal to emotion - only.
She supported the Youth "intifada of knifes" aka stabbing passing Israeli citizens as a political struggle, and supported riots on the Temple Mount/Al-Aqsa mosque.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So to be fair, just out of curiosity...
What would happen to a US citizen who openly supported murder of civillians, during a violent uprising taking place?

she was indicted for incitement to violence and for support of a terrorist organization.

Israel's standard stupid excuse.

Deal with the facts. Your Pom Pom flailing for those who support acts of Islamic terrorism is truly a disturbing pathology.

Why do you spend the largest part of your day trolling YouTube for cut and paste videos that make you appear to be just another deranged, Islamist wannabe?

 

[Hollie]

In the video she also mentioned a law against posting on social media, wonder if she's actually talking about this one:

Palestinian Authority shows its ‘authoritarian’ face through Cyber Crimes Law

The above law being passed by the PA and Abbas, NOT Israel.

How cute, so 35 seconds of video are enough to tell the whole story?
So to be fair let's look further into the facts of the case:

1. Dareen is an Israeli citizen
2.
On October 11, 2015 she was arrested by the Israeli police in a pre-dawn raid on her home. In November 2, 2015 she was indicted for incitement to violence and for support of a terrorist organization.

At the center of the indictment is a poem that she published in YouTube and Facebook titled "Qawem Ya Shaabi Qawemahum" (Resist my people, resist them). A full translation of the poem as made by a police officer is cited in the indictment document.
The rest of the indictment relates to 3 Facebook publication:
(1) Posting the picture of Israa Abed, a women from Nazareth, laid on the ground of the central bus station in Afula after she was shot by Israeli soldiers and guards.
(2) A profile picture with the Arabic writing "Ana Al-Shahid Al-Jay" (I am the next martyr),
(3) A post citing the call by Islamic Jihad for Intifada in the West Bank and calling for Intifada inside the green line for the Al-Aqsa Mosque.

So those 35 seconds of video are, as usual, an appeal to emotion - only.
She supported the Youth "intifada of knifes" aka stabbing passing Israeli citizens as a political struggle, and supported riots on the Temple Mount/Al-Aqsa mosque.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So to be fair, just out of curiosity...
What would happen to a US citizen who openly supported murder of civillians, during a violent uprising taking place?

she was indicted for incitement to violence and for support of a terrorist organization.

Israel's standard stupid excuse.

Another one of Your famous legal opinions.

Incitment to violence is a "stupid excuse"?

In criminal law, incitement is the encouragement of another person to commit a crime. Depending on the jurisdiction, some or all types of incitement may be illegal. Where illegal, it is known as an inchoate offense, where harm is intended but may or may not have actually occurred.

Incitement - Wikipedia

Since when has Israel ever given a rat's ass about any law?

Well, right here, chuckles.

“On October 11, 2015 she was arrested by the Israeli police in a pre-dawn raid on her home. In November 2, 2015 she was indicted for incitement to violence and for support of a terrorist organization.”


There are laws in Israel as well as most other modern, first world nations that address “incitement to violence and for support of a terrorist organization.”

The true obscenity is that you flail your Pom Poms in celebration for those Islamist backwaters which promote and further violence and support for Islamic terrorist organizations.

 

[rylah]

In the video she also mentioned a law against posting on social media, wonder if she's actually talking about this one:

Palestinian Authority shows its ‘authoritarian’ face through Cyber Crimes Law

The above law being passed by the PA and Abbas, NOT Israel.

How cute, so 35 seconds of video are enough to tell the whole story?
So to be fair let's look further into the facts of the case:

1. Dareen is an Israeli citizen
2.
On October 11, 2015 she was arrested by the Israeli police in a pre-dawn raid on her home. In November 2, 2015 she was indicted for incitement to violence and for support of a terrorist organization.

At the center of the indictment is a poem that she published in YouTube and Facebook titled "Qawem Ya Shaabi Qawemahum" (Resist my people, resist them). A full translation of the poem as made by a police officer is cited in the indictment document.
The rest of the indictment relates to 3 Facebook publication:
(1) Posting the picture of Israa Abed, a women from Nazareth, laid on the ground of the central bus station in Afula after she was shot by Israeli soldiers and guards.
(2) A profile picture with the Arabic writing "Ana Al-Shahid Al-Jay" (I am the next martyr),
(3) A post citing the call by Islamic Jihad for Intifada in the West Bank and calling for Intifada inside the green line for the Al-Aqsa Mosque.

So those 35 seconds of video are, as usual, an appeal to emotion - only.
She supported the Youth "intifada of knifes" aka stabbing passing Israeli citizens as a political struggle, and supported riots on the Temple Mount/Al-Aqsa mosque.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So to be fair, just out of curiosity...
What would happen to a US citizen who openly supported murder of civillians, during a violent uprising taking place?

she was indicted for incitement to violence and for support of a terrorist organization.

Israel's standard stupid excuse.

Another one of Your famous legal opinions.

Incitment to violence is a "stupid excuse"?

In criminal law, incitement is the encouragement of another person to commit a crime. Depending on the jurisdiction, some or all types of incitement may be illegal. Where illegal, it is known as an inchoate offense, where harm is intended but may or may not have actually occurred.

Incitement - Wikipedia

Since when has Israel ever given a rat's ass about any law?

So I guess You agree that incitement to violence is a crime.
Otherwise I just can't understant Your sidestepping non-answer.

Now to be fair, just out of curiosity...
What would happen to a US citizen who openly supported murder of civillians, during a violent uprising taking place?

 

[Shusha]

Now to be fair, just out of curiosity...
What would happen to a US citizen who openly supported murder of civillians, during a violent uprising taking place?

Apparently they get arrested.

 

[rylah]

abi, I'm interested to read what You think, any conclusions on the last case?

post #46

 

[P F Tinmore]

“incitement to violence and for support of a terrorist organization.”

Still pimping Israel's terrorist propaganda campaign, I see.

 

[Hollie]

“incitement to violence and for support of a terrorist organization.”

Still pimping Israel's terrorist propaganda campaign, I see.

Still sidestepping direct challenges to your unsupported claims, I see.

 

[P F Tinmore]

“incitement to violence and for support of a terrorist organization.”

Still pimping Israel's terrorist propaganda campaign, I see.

Still sidestepping direct challenges to your unsupported claims, I see.

What unsupported claims?

 

[Hollie]

“incitement to violence and for support of a terrorist organization.”

Still pimping Israel's terrorist propaganda campaign, I see.

Still sidestepping direct challenges to your unsupported claims, I see.

What unsupported claims?

The unsupported ones.

Ones like, “Since when has Israel ever given a rat's ass about any law?

Need a link?

 

[P F Tinmore]

“incitement to violence and for support of a terrorist organization.”

Still pimping Israel's terrorist propaganda campaign, I see.

Still sidestepping direct challenges to your unsupported claims, I see.

What unsupported claims?

The unsupported ones.

Ones like, “Since when has Israel ever given a rat's ass about any law?

Need a link?

Please.