BluePhantom
Educator (of liberals)
- Thread starter
- #61
And you most likely wouldn't have your child either. He gained custody of his child. He won. He went through hell so to speak - but he saved his child and he was able to raise her. To God be the glory.
To be willing to admit when you are wrong? Is not a sign of weakness, Chris.
Goodnight.
What are you going on about? He says that she had beaten him black and blue before this particular incident. He was one of those people hoping he could change crazy. I know better.
You always seem to think so
Hey, I've never been with anyone who abused me and I wouldn't put up with such treatment.
That's easy to say when you have never walked the path.
I think that you had hoped you could change her or something and so you chose to stick around. Not that you were "wrong" or "bad" for that, but you were mistaken for thinking that and for staying after the violence had begun.
On the other hand, if you knew what the cause of her "freaking out" was, why not just move back home? Did the cons of moving back at least closer to her family outweigh the pros?
Yes I was going to college. I was trying to get an education to be able to support this new family and provide for them. Going home wasn't an option if I was going to be a good father and husband who was able to provide for his family. Good God Chris...how can you be so shallow in your vision?