Is there any downside to learning that 95% of Congress is shady?

Status
Not open for further replies.

CrusaderFrank

Diamond Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
160,672
Reaction score
87,114
Points
2,645
Hypothetically, say it's disclosed that:
  • 20% of all Congress across Party lines were getting payments from Ukraine, some of which is likely paid in BitCoin
  • 40% of all Congress across Party lines were using insider information to trade stocks and getting better returns than any Hedge Fund Manager, and
  • 70% of all Congress across Party lines were getting money funneled through NGO's
The numbers are more than 100% because there is overlap. For example, some in Congress are using their Ukrainian laundered fund to buy stocks with business before Congress.

We'd have to face the fact that most of Congress has been enriching themselves at the expense of American citizens.

Article I, Section 6, mandates that members of Congress receive compensation for their service, paid from the U.S. Treasury, with salaries determined by law.

What's the downside?
 
95% are owned and controlled by Israehell and many American traitors like those on this forum, support this.
 
The toxic effect of a GOP that panders to the Pro Israel Christian, not conservative patriotic Americans.

Fox News is a big part of that. Fox News loves every Pro Israel RINO and pushes their candidacies.
 
95% are owned and controlled by Israehell and many American traitors like those on this forum, support this.


backed by the 911 billionaires and Fox News....
 
Are you seriously saying there's 25 honest people in Congress right now? ... HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW ...

Every last one of them are lying yellow-bellied cowards ...
 
Hypothetically, say it's disclosed that:
  • 20% of all Congress across Party lines were getting payments from Ukraine, some of which is likely paid in BitCoin
  • 40% of all Congress across Party lines were using insider information to trade stocks and getting better returns than any Hedge Fund Manager, and
  • 70% of all Congress across Party lines were getting money funneled through NGO's
The numbers are more than 100% because there is overlap. For example, some in Congress are using their Ukrainian laundered fund to buy stocks with business before Congress.

We'd have to face the fact that most of Congress has been enriching themselves at the expense of American citizens.

Article I, Section 6, mandates that members of Congress receive compensation for their service, paid from the U.S. Treasury, with salaries determined by law.

What's the downside?
Hypothetically let's say that Pluto is made of of cheese, what's the downside?

You can come up with all kinds of hypotheticals. They're meaningless unless you establish they are in fact true. So a link, would be appreciated.

But let's have some fun. The obvious downside is that the lawmaker can not be trusted to make decisions that are against the people who pay them. In fact that's the situation right now since campaigns cost money. Lots of it. So politicians court those that have a lot of money.

So my question is why are you focused on Ukraine? Something you provide no proof off. When the current cabinet is made out of billionaires lining their own pockets?

It seems to me that whatever Ukrainian lobby groups puts in the hand of politicians. If true, to reiterate. Is insignificant against the money that the Elon Musk's, Peter Thiel's, of this world, or any one of the Middle Eastern countries put in.
 
Last edited:
Hypothetically, say it's disclosed that:
  • 20% of all Congress across Party lines were getting payments from Ukraine, some of which is likely paid in BitCoin
  • 40% of all Congress across Party lines were using insider information to trade stocks and getting better returns than any Hedge Fund Manager, and
  • 70% of all Congress across Party lines were getting money funneled through NGO's
The numbers are more than 100% because there is overlap. For example, some in Congress are using their Ukrainian laundered fund to buy stocks with business before Congress.

We'd have to face the fact that most of Congress has been enriching themselves at the expense of American citizens.

Article I, Section 6, mandates that members of Congress receive compensation for their service, paid from the U.S. Treasury, with salaries determined by law.

What's the downside?
Well, how else is Congress going to keep up with the inflation they have created for us?

Have a heart man, they need to feed their families and be insanely rich at the same time.

In fact, they are due to spend another few trillion dollars this year on something really, really stupid. We have to keep that inflation inching higher and higher somehow.
 
My lawyer congress-critter is in the pocket of Tyson Foods. All are "dirty".

I'm even beginning to think Rand Paul is questionable and I never thought I would think that. Sad.

Congress = No confidence.
They are almost all in the pocket of Israehell. And many dumb Americans find this entirely acceptable.
 
The toxic effect of a GOP that panders to the Pro Israel Christian, not conservative patriotic Americans.

Fox News is a big part of that. Fox News loves every Pro Israel RINO and pushes their candidacies.
What had that got to do with anything but your feels.......THE IRS knows who is dirty.Unleash em and let the chips fall where they may
 
Well, how else is Congress going to keep up with the inflation they have created for us?

Have a heart man, they need to feed their families and be insanely rich at the same time.

In fact, they are due to spend another few trillion dollars this year on something really, really stupid. We have to keep that inflation inching higher and higher somehow.

They put themselves on commission, they get a cut of Federal spending
 
Hypothetically let's say that Pluto is made of of cheese, what's the downside?

You can come up with all kinds of hypotheticals. They're meaningless unless you establish they are in fact true. So a link, would be appreciated.

But let's have some fun. The obvious downside is that the lawmaker can not be trusted to make decisions that are against the people who pay them. In fact that's the situation right now since campaigns cost money. Lots of it. So politicians court those that have a lot of money.

So my question is why are you focused on Ukraine? Something you provide no proof off. When the current cabinet is made out of billionaires lining their own pockets?

It seems to me that whatever Ukrainian lobby groups puts in the hand of politicians. If true, to reiterate. Is insignificant against the money that the Elon Musk's, Peter Thiel's, of this world, or any one of the Middle Eastern countries put in.
https://unusualwhales.com/congress-trading-report-2024

Ukraine is a money laundering machine, blood money too
 
Hypothetically, say it's disclosed that:
  • 20% of all Congress across Party lines were getting payments from Ukraine, some of which is likely paid in BitCoin
  • 40% of all Congress across Party lines were using insider information to trade stocks and getting better returns than any Hedge Fund Manager, and
  • 70% of all Congress across Party lines were getting money funneled through NGO's
The numbers are more than 100% because there is overlap. For example, some in Congress are using their Ukrainian laundered fund to buy stocks with business before Congress.

We'd have to face the fact that most of Congress has been enriching themselves at the expense of American citizens.

Article I, Section 6, mandates that members of Congress receive compensation for their service, paid from the U.S. Treasury, with salaries determined by law.

What's the downside?
It would be great if you had a link.
 
Thread Locked for no link to support supposed facts, stated in OP Thread Post
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom