Is Kamala Harris an Imposter or Legitimately Qualified to be President? (Poll)

Is Kamala Harris an Imposter, or is she a Legitimately Qualified candidate for President?

  • An Imposter

    Votes: 17 51.5%
  • Legitimately Qualified

    Votes: 16 48.5%

  • Total voters
    33
Biden did not open the border to convicted murders in to the country.... They had no record of criminality when entering.....most of those who have been convicted, were let in prior to Biden's admin.... they came mostly from the Trump admin and the Obama admin.
ICE provided the data to Gonzales on Wednesday and did not indicate how many of the criminals entered the US during Harris’ tenure
Trump had closed borders and "Remain in Mexico", very few illegals got into the US.

Biden/Harris have open borders, they let in 12,000,000 illegals, including 425,000 criminals, 100,000 Chinese, 50,000 Russians, and who knows how many thousands of terrorists, including those on watch lists, even ISIS.
 
Trump had closed borders and "Remain in Mexico", very few illegals got into the US.

Biden/Harris have open borders, they let in 12,000,000 illegals, including 425,000 criminals, 100,000 Chinese, 50,000 Russians, and who knows how many thousands of terrorists, including those on watch lists, even ISIS.
You have a lot wrong!

If that number is even true, the 425k criminals were not let in as criminals under Biden. They mostly got in under Trump, Obama and even before Obama ....they lived here and had committed crimes, got charged, went to trial, and got convicted while here, that takes a long time...

Biden's ICE have been trying to deport the felons....but money, man power, and yes, state sanctuary cities, and court hearing back logs have made it difficult for ICE to accomplish their jobs...

Much of these back log and shortages in man power and money problems were addressed in the Senate Immigration security bill, which you blindly chose not to support.... :(

12 million were NOT LET IN....those were ENCOUNTERS at the border, people trying and repeating try-ers, not the asylum seekers that were actually let IN TO THE USA.
 
Last edited:
Is Kamala Harris having "Imposter Syndrome"? (avoiding real press conferences)

‘Anxious’ Kamala Harris is on track to have fewest interviews of any nominee — and even Dems are nervous​


Is she like a job interviewee who is totally unqualified trying to avoid answering any questions unless they are vetted and approved by her team?

She refuses to do a real press conference with wide-ranging questions for an hour or so. A sign that she is not prepared for the job.

The MSM, aka the "free press" are giving her a pass instead of insisting that she be grilled on her proposed policies.
Lets compare:

Candidate 1:
  • Hired as Prosecuting Attorney for the city of San Fran
  • Elected District Attorney for the second most densely populated city in American and 4th largest in California
  • Elected State Attorney General for the largest US state that would be the 5th largest economy in the world if it was a country unto itself
  • Elected Senator of the largest US State in population and economy
  • Elected Vice President of the US

Candidate 2:
  • Real Estate owner from family money
  • Trump name licensor with variable levels of success
  • Successful reality TV show host
 
1. Yes this is about Harris' open border policies, and allowing 425,000 criminals into the US

Pure fantasy on your part. Harris has done no such thing as she has not been in charge of anything. Check out the facts.
2. The world is on fire because Biden/Harris are weak on foreign policy.

BS. What has happened in the world has nothing to do with us. The world is overpopulated and that is the biggest problem. In addition, the entire world has been going south for decades and that trend is going to continue until a worldwide catastrophe occurs (naturally) that forces PEOPLE to work together for survival.
3. Letting 12,000,000 illegals into the US and giving them free food causes US food prices to go thru the roof is punishing US families.

I agree to a "certain" extent but people are human and make mistakes. When they do, they normally correct them. Trump makes mistakes and given that he has never acknowledged any mistakes, he is destined to repeat them adnauseum.
4. If democrats try to tell people who buy groceries that they can buy more groceries now than in 2020 they will be met with outrage. That is obviously propaganda.

Earnings have increase more than inflation, meaning that many people have money to buy groceries (even though the prices of groceries are inflated). This is not information released by the Democrats but data released by economic reports.

If you fail to check the data that is available, your bias will harm you in the long run.
 
Is Kamala Harris having "Imposter Syndrome"? (avoiding real press conferences)

‘Anxious’ Kamala Harris is on track to have fewest interviews of any nominee — and even Dems are nervous​


Is she like a job interviewee who is totally unqualified trying to avoid answering any questions unless they are vetted and approved by her team?

She refuses to do a real press conference with wide-ranging questions for an hour or so. A sign that she is not prepared for the job.

The MSM, aka the "free press" are giving her a pass instead of insisting that she be grilled on her proposed policies.
She wasn’t even qualified to be VP. She was picked only because the Dems said the needed a female black.

That she is in the running for the presidency is both laughable….and tragic.
 
Putin would never have gone into Ukraine if Trump was president. There were no wars anywhere on earth when Trump was president, and the Islamic terrorists did not attack anyone anywhere. Weak presidents cause world unrest and wars.
And Trump was the weakest! We all saw him kiss Putin's ass in Helsinki and we all heard him tell Putin to do "whatever he wants" with Ukraine.

Yeah, that's real strong?
 
You have a lot wrong! If that number is even true, the 425k criminals were not let in as criminals under Biden. They mostly got in under Trump, Obama and even before Obama ....they lived here and had committed crimes, got charged, went to trial, and got convicted while here, that takes a long time...

Biden's ICE have been trying to deport the felons....but money, man power, and yes, state sanctuary cities, and court hearing back logs have made it difficult for ICE to accomplish their jobs...Much of these back log and shortages in man power and money problems were addressed in the Senate Immigration security bill, which you blindly chose not to support.... :(

12 million were NOT LET IN....those were ENCOUNTERS at the border, people trying and repeating try-ers, not the asylum seekers that were actually let IN TO THE USA.

Stop typing lies. You are getting as bad as DragonLady, and I have her on ignore. Prove what you type with links.
Here is one chart showing the number of border encounters, Trump made them remain in Mexico, Biden let them in.

1727624156900.webp


1. Trump did not let illegals into the US, they had to remain in Mexico, Biden let them into the US.

2. Here is another chart showing how many illegals crossed into the US by president.
1727624283244.webp


3. ICE paused deportations, duh. That "bi-partisan" senate Bill was a joke and would NOT have passed the Senate with or without Trump's support' HR2, the House passed Bill was a better Bill


4. 12,000,000 illegals were let into the US by Biden, the 10m CBP processed, plus 2m "got-aways".
"Since January 2021, when Joe Biden came to office, there have been more than 10 million encounters - about 8 million came over the southwest land border with Mexico."
 
Lets compare:

Candidate 1:
  • Hired as Prosecuting Attorney for the city of San Fran
  • Elected District Attorney for the second most densely populated city in American and 4th largest in California
  • Elected State Attorney General for the largest US state that would be the 5th largest economy in the world if it was a country unto itself
  • Elected Senator of the largest US State in population and economy
  • Elected Vice President of the US

Candidate 2:
  • Real Estate owner from family money
  • Trump name licensor with variable levels of success
  • Successful reality TV show host
I have a better comparison:
Candidate 1 was a successful president, period.

Candidate 2 can't even do a real press conference to prove she understands the issues. (she's an imposter)
 
Pure fantasy on your part. Harris has done no such thing as she has not been in charge of anything. Check out the facts.

BS. What has happened in the world has nothing to do with us. The world is overpopulated and that is the biggest problem. In addition, the entire world has been going south for decades and that trend is going to continue until a worldwide catastrophe occurs (naturally) that forces PEOPLE to work together for survival.

I agree to a "certain" extent but people are human and make mistakes. When they do, they normally correct them. Trump makes mistakes and given that he has never acknowledged any mistakes, he is destined to repeat them ad-nauseum.

Earnings have increase more than inflation, meaning that many people have money to buy groceries (even though the prices of groceries are inflated). This is not information released by the Democrats but data released by economic reports. If you fail to check the data that is available, your bias will harm you in the long run.
1. Harris is part of the Biden administration. Open borders is her albatross to wear.

2. You apparently do not understand the meaning of the phrase "American leadership". I agree we do not want to be the "world's cop" but Biden/Harris lifted sanctions on Iran giving the Mullas $100b to spread terror around the world, not to mention China and Russia.

3. We agree to a certain extent that democrats fucked up the border, let in criminals and terrorists, and now the price of groceries are outrageous. We cannot allow those stupid people to keep running the country.

4. Earnings have NOT increased more than inflation, just ask any US family who buys groceries. What about those on fixed incomes, like retirees? Tell voters they are wrong, that groceries are more affordable now than under Trump.
 
1. Harris is part of the Biden administration. Open borders is her albatross to wear.

She was not the one making the decisions. She does NOT have that "albatross to wear"
2. You apparently do not understand the meaning of the phrase "American leadership". I agree we do not want to be the "world's cop" but Biden/Harris lifted sanctions on Iran giving the Mullas $100b to spread terror around the world, not to mention China and Russia.

It so happens that it was their money to begin with. We had put it on hold (as a sanction) but we had no way to keep it from them legally, if and when they complied with their side of the bargain...............which they did.
3. We agree to a certain extent that democrats fucked up the border, let in criminals and terrorists, and now the price of groceries are outrageous. We cannot allow those stupid people to keep running the country.

The price of groceries has nothing to do with immigrants or with Biden. It was due to the pandemic as groceries went up in price everywhere in the world. In Europe and South America, they went much higher than here. These "stupid" people have generated all-time highs in the stock market (meaning growth of the economy) and they have brought down inflation below most every other country in the world. Price of gasoline today in Miami Fl was $2.85 a gallon (what it cost me yesterday when I put gas in my car). The price of a galloon of gasoline in London TODAY is $5.95. Biden and his administration is what has brought that price down.
4. Earnings have NOT increased more than inflation, just ask any US family who buys groceries. What about those on fixed incomes, like retirees? Tell voters they are wrong, that groceries are more affordable now than under Trump.

That are the statistics. That some families are not seeing that is not something unusual.

Now, why don't you explain to me this fact:

Billionaires are $3.3 trillion richer than in 2020, and their wealth has grown three times faster than the rate of inflation.
 
She was not the one making the decisions. She does NOT have that "albatross to wear"

It so happens that it was their money to begin with. We had put it on hold (as a sanction) but we had no way to keep it from them legally, if and when they complied with their side of the bargain...............which they did.

The price of groceries has nothing to do with immigrants or with Biden. It was due to the pandemic as groceries went up in price everywhere in the world. In Europe and South America, they went much higher than here. These "stupid" people have generated all-time highs in the stock market (meaning growth of the economy) and they have brought down inflation below most every other country in the world. Price of gasoline today in Miami Fl was $2.85 a gallon (what it cost me yesterday when I put gas in my car). The price of a galloon of gasoline in London TODAY is $5.95. Biden and his administration is what has brought that price down.

That are the statistics. That some families are not seeing that is not something unusual.

Now, why don't you explain to me this fact:
Billionaires are $3.3 trillion richer than in 2020, and their wealth has grown three times faster than the rate of inflation.
1. Kamala owns the open borders, her title is "Border Czar"

2. Their money? To do terror. Bad decision giving it to them.

3. The Law of Supply & Demand says that giving 20m or so illegals free food causes prices to rise.

4. I'm fine having voters base their decision on the affordability of groceries.

5. Billionaires gain wealth when the stock market rises, duh.
 
1. Kamala owns the open borders, her title is "Border Czar"

2. Their money? To do terror. Bad decision giving it to them.

3. The Law of Supply & Demand says that giving 20m or so illegals free food causes prices to rise.

4. I'm fine having voters base their decision on the affordability of groceries.

5. Billionaires gain wealth when the stock market rises, duh.
You are extremely biased and lacking ability to evaluate information in what "is" and not what you think it to be. I have been "officially and publicly" evaluating information for 47 years. It is what I was trained to do and have done successfully during this entire time.

Having said that, it is a waste of time trying to show you anything as your mind is closed to anything that does not agree with what you already believe.

You are wrong in what you think.
 
GW proved his mettle during the war.
Harris is an imposter until proven otherwise, such as demonstrating a grasp of the issues at a press conference.

That's not the point. The point is the claim was that you need to have lots of press conferences in order to "qualify" to be president. Which in itself is a crock of shit, but anyway. When pushed you then make some other excuse.

Look, we all know what you're doing. You don't like Kamala for one reason, she's Democrat. In the world of "ugh ugh, Democrat bad, Republican good, opppsie I just scraped my knuckles on floor" kind of mentality, you'll say ANYTHING to make it look like she shouldn't be president.

When Trump acts like a ******* child day in, day out.
 
That's not the point. The point is the claim was that you need to have lots of press conferences in order to "qualify" to be president. Which in itself is a crock of shit, but anyway. When pushed you then make some other excuse.

Look, we all know what you're doing. You don't like Kamala for one reason, she's Democrat. In the world of "ugh ugh, Democrat bad, Republican good, opppsie I just scraped my knuckles on floor" kind of mentality, you'll say ANYTHING to make it look like she shouldn't be president. When Trump acts like a ******* child day in, day out.
Simple question, do you think Kamala will be directing her cabinet what policies she wants to implement for the betterment of the country based on her sound logic and experience, or do you believe that she will be a teleprompter reader doing as her staff tells her to do, not understanding why?

The purpose of press conferences is to vet the candidates as to which policies they want, and why.
Kamala is a black box, who knows what policies she is for or against? She's flipping and flopping on everything.
 
Simple question, do you think Kamala will be directing her cabinet what policies she wants to implement for the betterment of the country based on her sound logic and experience, or do you believe that she will be a teleprompter reader doing as her staff tells her to do, not understanding why?

The purpose of press conferences is to vet the candidates as to which policies they want, and why.
Kamala is a black box, who knows what policies she is for or against? She's flipping and flopping on everything.

Are you trying to suggest that being in a cabinet meeting is the same as addressing the whole country on TV? Really?

I think you're just trying to find excuses why people should think that using a teleprompter means she shouldn't be president. And while it's all very amusing, it's also a little bizarre on a politics forum.
 
Are you trying to suggest that being in a cabinet meeting is the same as addressing the whole country on TV? Really?
I think you're just trying to find excuses why people should think that using a teleprompter means she shouldn't be president. And while it's all very amusing, it's also a little bizarre on a politics forum.
1. No clue what your 1st sentence is about.

2. My point is that a "teleprompter reader" is not qualified to be president, aka the "chief executive", aka the "commander-in-chief". Kamala needs to demonstrate competence by answering wide ranging questions in a real press conference to see that she has command of the facts and policies. Not tap-dancing around the questions.
 
15th post
1. No clue what your 1st sentence is about.

2. My point is that a "teleprompter reader" is not qualified to be president, aka the "chief executive", aka the "commander-in-chief". Kamala needs to demonstrate competence by answering wide ranging questions in a real press conference to see that she has command of the facts and policies. Not tap-dancing around the questions.

You're suggesting that if someone doesn't do press conferences that they're not going to be able to do cabinet meetings. Or at least that's what I got from it. Which is absurd.

Your point is that.... doesn't matter, it's a ridiculous point.

Using a teleprompter means a person doesn't have to memorize their speech. Why waste time memorizing a speech? It doesn't serve any purpose whatsoever.

And "tap-dancing around the questions" is what makes a good politician.

She's controlling the narrative. She's taking any question and then giving people what she wants them to hear.

Trump can't stay on message because he doesn't use a teleprompter, and he doesn't remember a speech. He just goes in there and verbally shits himself.

Again, the point is you're trying to make a circle fit a square hole. You want her to be bad, so you go on about the teleprompter thing like... it has any importance whatsoever.


"President Donald Trump — who used to mock predecessor Barack Obama for using the devices during speeches — said Friday that technical problems with the teleprompter during his "Salute to America" led to his head-scratching remarks about the Continental Army securing not-yet existent "airports" during the Revolutionary War."

As if Trump didn't use a teleprompter when president. Did anyone care? NO. Did you all say "I'm never voting for him again because he used a teleprompter"??? NO.
 
Lets compare:

Candidate 1:
  • Hired as Prosecuting Attorney for the city of San Fran
  • Elected District Attorney for the second most densely populated city in American and 4th largest in California
  • Elected State Attorney General for the largest US state that would be the 5th largest economy in the world if it was a country unto itself
  • Elected Senator of the largest US State in population and economy
  • Elected Vice President of the US

Candidate 2:
  • Real Estate owner from family money
  • Trump name licensor with variable levels of success
  • Successful reality TV show host
Winner Winner Chicken Dinner!!
 
4. 12,000,000 illegals were let into the US by Biden, the 10m CBP processed, plus 2m "got-aways".

"Since January 2021, when Joe Biden came to office, there have been more than 10 million encounters - about 8 million came over the southwest land border with Mexico."
Did you even read or understand this article?

Encounters are illegals crossing our border trying to get entrance in to the country. We can not control that part.

When they cross and turn themselves in, they are detained, interviewed, then deported if they do not meet the asylum seeker protocol standards that gives them an immigration court date to determine if they truly qualify as an asylum seeker....MOST ARE DEPORTED and not let in to our country.

Border crossers are encounters, but NOT all encounters are let in to await their court hearing...as said, most are deported after their interviews while in detention.

Your 12,000,000 figure, the 8 million of them over the 4 years at the Southern border which is your main concern....are encounters, people who tried to be let in, but Most of those people were deported after their prelim interviews disqualified them.

The Senate bill changed that situation. It funded more interviewers, more border patrol, more detention facilities to hold them, more courts and judges to hear the asylum cases in the courts and expeditiously eliminate the years and years of court backlog....

The Senate plan to fix our border problems was good! They touched every problem, every backlog, hardened asylum protocols....funded the Immigration courts...built the additional detention centers...and came up with ways to deter crossers....

With end result of asylum seekers being held in detention until their court hearings instead of catch and release because court hearings are taking years.

it wasn't some showmanship sweet talking but phony Bill....it was the real deal immigration reform.
 
You're suggesting that if someone doesn't do press conferences that they're not going to be able to do cabinet meetings. Or at least that's what I got from it. Which is absurd.

Your point is that.... doesn't matter, it's a ridiculous point. Using a teleprompter means a person doesn't have to memorize their speech. Why waste time memorizing a speech? It doesn't serve any purpose whatsoever.

And "tap-dancing around the questions" is what makes a good politician. She's controlling the narrative. She's taking any question and then giving people what she wants them to hear. Trump can't stay on message because he doesn't use a teleprompter, and he doesn't remember a speech. He just goes in there and verbally shits himself.

Again, the point is you're trying to make a circle fit a square hole. You want her to be bad, so you go on about the teleprompter thing like... it has any importance whatsoever.

"President Donald Trump — who used to mock predecessor Barack Obama for using the devices during speeches — said Friday that technical problems with the teleprompter during his "Salute to America" led to his head-scratching remarks about the Continental Army securing not-yet existent "airports" during the Revolutionary War." As if Trump didn't use a teleprompter when president. Did anyone care? NO. Did you all say "I'm never voting for him again because he used a teleprompter"??? NO.
You can try to obfuscate the discussion of "competence" with the use of teleprompters, but that just shows how you can't hide the FACT that Kamala cannot do a real press conference to demonstrate competence.

Kamala is an imposter trying to fool the voters with the help of the complicit MSM. Kamala is an imposter, period.
 
Back
Top Bottom