Is Joe’s blanket pardon of Hunter an obstruction of justice?

[Lisa558]

Adam Shiff thinks so. Or at least he did. Back in 2018, he wrote that pardoning people for crimes in which the president himself is implicated is an obstruction of justice.

It is obvious to anyone with a thinking brain that Joe gained by allowing, or even enabling, his family to get rich by peddling his influence. It is more likely than not that he himself is “The Big Guy” who raked in 10% of the take. But now, because Joe made a blanket pardon covering yet-undiscovered crimes, he has protected himself.

But…..the pardon does not cover FUTURE crimes. There is nothing preventing the DOJ from calling Hunter to testify as to crimes committed by his father, uncle, or other family members regarding the corruption scheme they were running. He cannot be held liable for what he did, but he CAN be charged with perjury if he lies.

Flashback: Adam Schiff said pardons in which the president is directly implicated could be an ‘obstruction of justice’

As Adam Schiff said in 2018, we wouldn’t want a president abusing the pardon power in order to “shield himself from liability” because such circumstances could very easily amount to an “obstruct[ion of] justice.” Schiff ...

www.americanthinker.com

 

[ColonelAngus]

At first I thought it was for the 3 felonies he was convicted of this summer….not a 10 year blanket amnesty….THAT GAVE HUNTER 4 HOURS TO BREAK ANY FEDERAL LAWS!

THIS IS ALL ABOUT BURISMA DIRTY MONEY. THIS IS ALL ABOUT PROTECTING JOE.

This is corrupt AF.

 

[Picaro]

It's part of an ongoing organized criminal conspiracy and official corruption.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Can Trump give amnesty to everyone in the country for their entire lives for any federal crimes?

He legally can….

Amazing.

https://www.justice.gov/d9/2024-12/biden_warrant.pdf

Read the text of the clemency. It is incredible.

HAS COMMITTED, OR MAY HAVE COMMITTED OR TAKEN PART IN. FROM JAN 1 2014 to DEC 1 2024.

The real pardon…..JOE BIDEN PARDONED HIMSELF FOR TAKING BRIBE MONEY AND HUNTER WAS THE BAG MAN.

 

[westwall]

Adam Shiff thinks so. Or at least he did. Back in 2018, he wrote that pardoning people for crimes in which the president himself is implicated is an obstruction of justice.

It is obvious to anyone with a thinking brain that Joe gained by allowing, or even enabling, his family to get rich by peddling his influence. It is more likely than not that he himself is “The Big Guy” who raked in 10% of the take. But now, because Joe made a blanket pardon covering yet-undiscovered crimes, he has protected himself.

But…..the pardon does not cover FUTURE crimes. There is nothing preventing the DOJ from calling Hunter to testify as to crimes committed by his father, uncle, or other family members regarding the corruption scheme they were running. He cannot be held liable for what he did, but he CAN be charged with perjury if he lies.

Flashback: Adam Schiff said pardons in which the president is directly implicated could be an ‘obstruction of justice’

As Adam Schiff said in 2018, we wouldn’t want a president abusing the pardon power in order to “shield himself from liability” because such circumstances could very easily amount to an “obstruct[ion of] justice.” Schiff ...

www.americanthinker.com

Yup. I do believe it is!

 

[ColonelAngus]

Adam Shiff thinks so. Or at least he did. Back in 2018, he wrote that pardoning people for crimes in which the president himself is implicated is an obstruction of justice.

It is obvious to anyone with a thinking brain that Joe gained by allowing, or even enabling, his family to get rich by peddling his influence. It is more likely than not that he himself is “The Big Guy” who raked in 10% of the take. But now, because Joe made a blanket pardon covering yet-undiscovered crimes, he has protected himself.

But…..the pardon does not cover FUTURE crimes. There is nothing preventing the DOJ from calling Hunter to testify as to crimes committed by his father, uncle, or other family members regarding the corruption scheme they were running. He cannot be held liable for what he did, but he CAN be charged with perjury if he lies.

Flashback: Adam Schiff said pardons in which the president is directly implicated could be an ‘obstruction of justice’

As Adam Schiff said in 2018, we wouldn’t want a president abusing the pardon power in order to “shield himself from liability” because such circumstances could very easily amount to an “obstruct[ion of] justice.” Schiff ...

www.americanthinker.com

The Dems always do what they accuse the other side of doing.

Schiff is one of the biggest pieces of human trash to ever be in Congress.

 

[Picaro]

They were career criminals, so they have plenty going on before 2014 in the Biden mafia. Joe himself bragged openly about extorting the Ukraine govt. as VP under Obama's criminal guidance..

 

[1srelluc]

Can Trump give amnesty to everyone in the country for their entire lives for any federal crimes?

He legally can….

Amazing.

https://www.justice.gov/d9/2024-12/biden_warrant.pdf

Read the text of the clemency. It is incredible.

HAS COMMITTED, OR MAY HAVE COMMITTED OR TAKEN PART IN. FROM JAN 1 2014 to DEC 1 2024.

The real pardon…..JOE BIDEN PARDONED HIMSELF FOR TAKING BRIBE MONEY AND HUNTER WAS THE BAG MAN.

View attachment 1049573

Damn, you even get a gold star!

 

[ColonelAngus]

Damn, you even get a gold star!

I prefer chocolate starfish.

 

[Votto]

Can Trump give amnesty to everyone in the country for their entire lives for any federal crimes?

He legally can….

Amazing.

https://www.justice.gov/d9/2024-12/biden_warrant.pdf

Read the text of the clemency. It is incredible.

HAS COMMITTED, OR MAY HAVE COMMITTED OR TAKEN PART IN. FROM JAN 1 2014 to DEC 1 2024.

The real pardon…..JOE BIDEN PARDONED HIMSELF FOR TAKING BRIBE MONEY AND HUNTER WAS THE BAG MAN.

View attachment 1049573

All Democrats already have a pardon from illegal acts it seems

It only is fair if the rest of us have that as well.

 

[YoursTruly]

Adam Shiff thinks so. Or at least he did. Back in 2018, he wrote that pardoning people for crimes in which the president himself is implicated is an obstruction of justice.

It is obvious to anyone with a thinking brain that Joe gained by allowing, or even enabling, his family to get rich by peddling his influence. It is more likely than not that he himself is “The Big Guy” who raked in 10% of the take. But now, because Joe made a blanket pardon covering yet-undiscovered crimes, he has protected himself.

But…..the pardon does not cover FUTURE crimes. There is nothing preventing the DOJ from calling Hunter to testify as to crimes committed by his father, uncle, or other family members regarding the corruption scheme they were running. He cannot be held liable for what he did, but he CAN be charged with perjury if he lies.

Flashback: Adam Schiff said pardons in which the president is directly implicated could be an ‘obstruction of justice’

As Adam Schiff said in 2018, we wouldn’t want a president abusing the pardon power in order to “shield himself from liability” because such circumstances could very easily amount to an “obstruct[ion of] justice.” Schiff ...

www.americanthinker.com

Thanks to Trumps "presidential immunity," the only backlash from any of this is going to be public opinion.

 

[berg80]

Adam Shiff thinks so. Or at least he did. Back in 2018, he wrote that pardoning people for crimes in which the president himself is implicated is an obstruction of justice.

Hey, thanks for pointing out the difference between trump pardoning Roger Stone..........whose refusal to cooperate with Mueller trump bought with a pardon..........and the absence of any credible evidence Joe was implicated in a crime of any sort. Meaning from a legal standpoint, Joe got nothing from pardoning his kid.

As with many trumpian narratives the idea Joe got a legal benefit from the pardon begins with the essential lie of legal jeopardy for Joe from something Hunter did. Repubs have failed to produce any evidence Joe was involved in a crime. Every attempt has been debunked. Unfortunately, trumples don't know that because of the media bubble they surround themselves with.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Thanks to Trumps "presidential immunity," the only backlash from any of this is going to be public opinion.

Why do YOU support a 10 year blanket amnesty?

Should Trump also do this?

 

[Mac1958]

Hey, thanks for pointing out the difference between trump pardoning Roger Stone..........whose refusal to cooperate with Mueller trump bought with a pardon..........and the absence of any credible evidence Joe was implicated in a crime of any sort. Meaning from a legal standpoint, Joe got nothing from pardoning his kid.

As with many trumpian narratives the idea Joe got a legal benefit from the pardon begins with the essential lie of legal jeopardy for Joe from something Hunter did. Repubs have failed to produce any evidence Joe was involved in a crime. Every attempt has been debunked. Unfortunately, trumples don't know that because of the media bubble they surround themselves with.

It sure is nice to see the Trumpsters suddenly care about this stuff, though!

 

[ColonelAngus]

Notice how the left wing communist cult fucks cannot address the pardon directly.

They talk about Trump.

They all suffer from TDS.

Can anyone on the left discuss the pardon without mentioning Trump?

I mentioned Trump…but I also directly discussed the pardona nd included the actual PDF FROM THE FUCKING DOJ.

 

[Marener]

Adam Shiff thinks so. Or at least he did. Back in 2018, he wrote that pardoning people for crimes in which the president himself is implicated is an obstruction of justice.

It is obvious to anyone with a thinking brain that Joe gained by allowing, or even enabling, his family to get rich by peddling his influence. It is more likely than not that he himself is “The Big Guy” who raked in 10% of the take. But now, because Joe made a blanket pardon covering yet-undiscovered crimes, he has protected himself.

But…..the pardon does not cover FUTURE crimes. There is nothing preventing the DOJ from calling Hunter to testify as to crimes committed by his father, uncle, or other family members regarding the corruption scheme they were running. He cannot be held liable for what he did, but he CAN be charged with perjury if he lies.

Flashback: Adam Schiff said pardons in which the president is directly implicated could be an ‘obstruction of justice’

As Adam Schiff said in 2018, we wouldn’t want a president abusing the pardon power in order to “shield himself from liability” because such circumstances could very easily amount to an “obstruct[ion of] justice.” Schiff ...

www.americanthinker.com

Since Joe Biden isn’t implicated in any crimes, it can’t be considered equivalent.

 

[ColonelAngus]

It sure is nice to see the Trumpsters suddenly care about this stuff, though!

Address the pardon.

Why do you support a 10 year blanket clemency?

 

[ColonelAngus]

Biden’s pardon goes to Jan 1 2014.

The left was still sucking Trump’s cock back then.

You people are such frauds.

 

[Lisa558]

Since Joe Biden isn’t implicated in any crimes, it can’t be considered equivalent.

yeah, riiiiiight……

He saw his drug addict son and other family members turning into multimillionaires when he was VP and allowed it to continue - if not actively enabling it. The DOJ will get to the bottom of it.

 

[JoeMoma]

Adam Shiff thinks so. Or at least he did. Back in 2018, he wrote that pardoning people for crimes in which the president himself is implicated is an obstruction of justice.

It is obvious to anyone with a thinking brain that Joe gained by allowing, or even enabling, his family to get rich by peddling his influence. It is more likely than not that he himself is “The Big Guy” who raked in 10% of the take. But now, because Joe made a blanket pardon covering yet-undiscovered crimes, he has protected himself.

But…..the pardon does not cover FUTURE crimes. There is nothing preventing the DOJ from calling Hunter to testify as to crimes committed by his father, uncle, or other family members regarding the corruption scheme they were running. He cannot be held liable for what he did, but he CAN be charged with perjury if he lies.

Flashback: Adam Schiff said pardons in which the president is directly implicated could be an ‘obstruction of justice’

As Adam Schiff said in 2018, we wouldn’t want a president abusing the pardon power in order to “shield himself from liability” because such circumstances could very easily amount to an “obstruct[ion of] justice.” Schiff ...

www.americanthinker.com

It's legal obstruction.