Is it really OK to ignore court orders?

[Stryder50]

Are you trump guys really OK with this?

It's a terrible precedent. If the chief executive can't follow the law why should we have to?

When the judge (lower level District Court - Not USSC) has no authority to give this bogus order, than yes it is.

If you lefturd loonies knew your Constitution and laws, this would be clear.

 

[Crepitus]

Yeah, when they are illegitimate, you betcha.

What was "illegitimate" about it?

 

[Crepitus]

A court ruling is not the Law. Only the Legislative Branch can make law.

The law is you follow the court rulings.

DERP

 

[Crepitus]

sure did every time the court stopped him he created a new order and ignored the old court order

Fakest of fake news. He recrafted the order to comply with the court ruling.

That's the way it's supposed to work.

 

[Crepitus]

where rank stupidity is ignored .

It already is, tRumpling. That's how he got elected.

 

[Crepitus]

Are you still mad about Eric Holder ignoring subpoenas over his arms dealing?

Oh look, a deflection.

That's a sure sign you know I'm right.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Are you trump guys really OK with this?

It's a terrible precedent. If the chief executive can't follow the law why should we have to?

It is now, and forevermore.

 

[WelfareQueen]

The law is you follow the court rulings.

DERP

Nope. The Court offers an opinion. The opinion does not carry the force of Law.

 

[westwall]

What was "illegitimate" about it?

The judge doesn't have the power to interfere with the Executive Branch.

He is trying to impose judicial power, where none exists.

Had you taken a civics class you would understand this.

 

[Crepitus]

When the judge (lower level District Court - Not USSC) has no authority to give this bogus order, than yes it is.

If you lefturd loonies knew your Constitution and laws, this would be clear.

I realize that's the current RWNJ talking point but it is simply untrue.

Nope. The Court offers an opinion. The opinion does not carry the force of Law.

Nope. The court makes a ruling.

Where are you people from?

 

[Crepitus]

The judge doesn't have the power to interfere with the Executive Branch.

That is just RWNJ bullshit fed to the weak-minded.

 

[WelfareQueen]

I realize that's the current RWNJ talking point but it is simply untrue.

Nope. The court makes a ruling.

Where are you people from?

The ruling is a legal opinion. Nothing more. All Law under our Constitution is derived from We the People. Rule by Consent of the Governed. We fought a Revolution over the idea.

The Courts have no power to Create, Amend, or Nullify Law. Only the Legislative Branch (the People's Branch) has such power.

A Court can certainly offer an opinion that something may be unconstitutional, but that does not nullify it. The Executive Branch has a co-equal responsibility to consider Constitutional questions. One opinion should not and does not Trump the other(pun intended).

 

[Darkwind]

What was "illegitimate" about it?

Would this judge have the authority to tell the President that his nomination for Secretary of State was the wrong person and order him to pick someone else?

Would the President then have to obey that order?

 

[Darkwind]

I realize that's the current RWNJ talking point but it is simply untrue.

Nope. The court makes a ruling.

Where are you people from?

What is unclear to you? The judiciary can make a ruling on a violation of the Constitution or a criminal violation. That is it

The Executive DOES haver authority to act in America's behalf.

Where are you from? Lala land?

 

[Darkwind]

Just a small list of what the terrorists have done and why the President has the authority to deport them.

 

[Stryder50]

I realize that's the current RWNJ talking point but it is simply untrue.

Nope. The court makes a ruling.

Where are you people from?

And your's is a current LWNJ misconception.

There are several layers/levels of courts/judges in this country.

A local traffic court judge will not have authority over a POTUS. Only the U.S. Supreme Court would.

 

[MisterBeale]

Are you trump guys really OK with this?

It's a terrible precedent. If the chief executive can't follow the law why should we have to?

 

[Stryder50]

The law is you follow the court rulings.

DERP

Tell that to the Clinton's, Obama's, and Biden's.

BTW, has to be a court that has authority and jurisdiction for that "ruling".

 

[Stryder50]

Guilty or not.

They are guilty of illegal entry, no court ruling needed on that.
They are linked to terrorist organizations and actions, and other criminal conduct, making them an enemy of the USA.
This "judge" and those who support him are guilty of aiding and abetting enemies of the United States.
That used to be known as Treason.

 

[dblack]

As far as we know, not a one did.

Presumption of innocence is so "last century".