Is it ethical for the Democratic party to keep blacks on the plantation needing government handouts

[danielpalos]

let's all earn the same so we can all pay the same.

Like behaviors, not all actions are equal.

Would you like for the government to regulate wages?

except equal payment of taxes as a percentage? why that form of equality and not the other.

Because by definition that is equal.

equality is a social concept not a capital concept. how socialist of you.

Equality is a mathematical concept. And since wages are measured in numbers that is the measure of equality. Proportionality is equality.

it is Not a Capital concept regardless of any mathematical computations required for the sake of accuracy, nothing more.

 

[ding]

Like behaviors, not all actions are equal.

Would you like for the government to regulate wages?

except equal payment of taxes as a percentage? why that form of equality and not the other.

Because by definition that is equal.

equality is a social concept not a capital concept. how socialist of you.

Equality is a mathematical concept. And since wages are measured in numbers that is the measure of equality. Proportionality is equality.

it is Not a Capital concept regardless of any mathematical computations required for the sake of accuracy, nothing more.

If you pay 25 cents for every dollar earned and I pay 25 cents for every dollar earned how is that not equal?

 

[danielpalos]

except equal payment of taxes as a percentage? why that form of equality and not the other.

Because by definition that is equal.

equality is a social concept not a capital concept. how socialist of you.

Equality is a mathematical concept. And since wages are measured in numbers that is the measure of equality. Proportionality is equality.

it is Not a Capital concept regardless of any mathematical computations required for the sake of accuracy, nothing more.

If you pay 25 cents for every dollar earned and I pay 25 cents for every dollar earned how is that not equal?

we both also earn the same Because, if we have to quibble, equality is a social concept regardless of your capital bottom line.

 

[ding]

Because by definition that is equal.

equality is a social concept not a capital concept. how socialist of you.

Equality is a mathematical concept. And since wages are measured in numbers that is the measure of equality. Proportionality is equality.

it is Not a Capital concept regardless of any mathematical computations required for the sake of accuracy, nothing more.

If you pay 25 cents for every dollar earned and I pay 25 cents for every dollar earned how is that not equal?

we both also earn the same Because, if we have to quibble, equality is a social concept regardless of your capital bottom line.

I doubt we both earn the same because we most likely don’t produce the same.

 

[ding]

But we can pay the same when we each pay 25 cents for every dollar earned.

 

[danielpalos]

equality is a social concept not a capital concept. how socialist of you.

Equality is a mathematical concept. And since wages are measured in numbers that is the measure of equality. Proportionality is equality.

it is Not a Capital concept regardless of any mathematical computations required for the sake of accuracy, nothing more.

If you pay 25 cents for every dollar earned and I pay 25 cents for every dollar earned how is that not equal?

we both also earn the same Because, if we have to quibble, equality is a social concept regardless of your capital bottom line.

I doubt we both earn the same because we most likely don’t produce the same.

why expect equality on one side of an equation but not the other?

 

[danielpalos]

But we can pay the same when we each pay 25 cents for every dollar earned.

the equality should be in earning, not spending; anybody can spend.

 

[ding]

Equality is a mathematical concept. And since wages are measured in numbers that is the measure of equality. Proportionality is equality.

it is Not a Capital concept regardless of any mathematical computations required for the sake of accuracy, nothing more.

If you pay 25 cents for every dollar earned and I pay 25 cents for every dollar earned how is that not equal?

we both also earn the same Because, if we have to quibble, equality is a social concept regardless of your capital bottom line.

I doubt we both earn the same because we most likely don’t produce the same.

why expect equality on one side of an equation but not the other?

Because spending more than you take in is not sustainable.

 

[ding]

But we can pay the same when we each pay 25 cents for every dollar earned.

the equality should be in earning, not spending; anybody can spend.

Sure, when you produce the same you can earn the same.

 

[danielpalos]

it is Not a Capital concept regardless of any mathematical computations required for the sake of accuracy, nothing more.

If you pay 25 cents for every dollar earned and I pay 25 cents for every dollar earned how is that not equal?

we both also earn the same Because, if we have to quibble, equality is a social concept regardless of your capital bottom line.

I doubt we both earn the same because we most likely don’t produce the same.

why expect equality on one side of an equation but not the other?

Because spending more than you take in is not sustainable.

all the while, the right wing insists tax cut economics work, and it is merely a spending problem.

 

[danielpalos]

But we can pay the same when we each pay 25 cents for every dollar earned.

the equality should be in earning, not spending; anybody can spend.

Sure, when you produce the same you can earn the same.

capitalism needs Perfect information for that; we already know, the right wing is mostly full of fallacy.

why not fix the Goalposts at a simple minimum deemed appropriate for market participation.

 

[rightwinger]

except equal payment of taxes as a percentage? why that form of equality and not the other.

Because by definition that is equal.

equality is a social concept not a capital concept. how socialist of you.

Equality is a mathematical concept. And since wages are measured in numbers that is the measure of equality. Proportionality is equality.

it is Not a Capital concept regardless of any mathematical computations required for the sake of accuracy, nothing more.

If you pay 25 cents for every dollar earned and I pay 25 cents for every dollar earned how is that not equal?

It does not reflect a progressive tax rate

If I pay 25 cents on every dollar and I need my paycheck to support a family, pay for healthcare and put a roof over my head
You pay 25 cents on every dollar and are a multimillionaire

We should not pay the same rate

 

[ding]

If you pay 25 cents for every dollar earned and I pay 25 cents for every dollar earned how is that not equal?

we both also earn the same Because, if we have to quibble, equality is a social concept regardless of your capital bottom line.

I doubt we both earn the same because we most likely don’t produce the same.

why expect equality on one side of an equation but not the other?

Because spending more than you take in is not sustainable.

all the while, the right wing insists tax cut economics work, and it is merely a spending problem.

It's both a spending and a taxation problem.

 

[ding]

But we can pay the same when we each pay 25 cents for every dollar earned.

the equality should be in earning, not spending; anybody can spend.

Sure, when you produce the same you can earn the same.

capitalism needs Perfect information for that; we already know, the right wing is mostly full of fallacy.

why not fix the Goalposts at a simple minimum deemed appropriate for market participation.

Nope, the free market is Darwinian and needs no direction.

 

[ding]

Because by definition that is equal.

equality is a social concept not a capital concept. how socialist of you.

Equality is a mathematical concept. And since wages are measured in numbers that is the measure of equality. Proportionality is equality.

it is Not a Capital concept regardless of any mathematical computations required for the sake of accuracy, nothing more.

If you pay 25 cents for every dollar earned and I pay 25 cents for every dollar earned how is that not equal?

It does not reflect a progressive tax rate

If I pay 25 cents on every dollar and I need my paycheck to support a family, pay for healthcare and put a roof over my head
You pay 25 cents on every dollar and are a multimillionaire

We should not pay the same rate

Then the multimillionaire pays more in absolute dollars because he earns more.

$40,000 x 0.25 = $10,000

$1,000,000 x 0.25 = $250,000

see?

 

[danielpalos]

But we can pay the same when we each pay 25 cents for every dollar earned.

the equality should be in earning, not spending; anybody can spend.

Sure, when you produce the same you can earn the same.

capitalism needs Perfect information for that; we already know, the right wing is mostly full of fallacy.

why not fix the Goalposts at a simple minimum deemed appropriate for market participation.

Nope, the free market is Darwinian and needs no direction.

the "free market" died in 1929; socialism has been hard at work bailing out Capitalism, ever since.

 

[danielpalos]

equality is a social concept not a capital concept. how socialist of you.

Equality is a mathematical concept. And since wages are measured in numbers that is the measure of equality. Proportionality is equality.

it is Not a Capital concept regardless of any mathematical computations required for the sake of accuracy, nothing more.

If you pay 25 cents for every dollar earned and I pay 25 cents for every dollar earned how is that not equal?

It does not reflect a progressive tax rate

If I pay 25 cents on every dollar and I need my paycheck to support a family, pay for healthcare and put a roof over my head
You pay 25 cents on every dollar and are a multimillionaire

We should not pay the same rate

Then the multimillionaire pays more in absolute dollars because he earns more.

$40,000 x 0.25 = $10,000

$1,000,000 x 0.25 = $250,000

see?

they pay more, with progressive taxation. see.

 

[ding]

But we can pay the same when we each pay 25 cents for every dollar earned.

the equality should be in earning, not spending; anybody can spend.

Sure, when you produce the same you can earn the same.

capitalism needs Perfect information for that; we already know, the right wing is mostly full of fallacy.

why not fix the Goalposts at a simple minimum deemed appropriate for market participation.

Nope, the free market is Darwinian and needs no direction.

the "free market" died in 1929; socialism has been hard at work bailing out Capitalism, ever since.

Not exactly. We have managed markets. That's not socialism. Socialism sucks big green donkey dicks.

 

[ding]

Equality is a mathematical concept. And since wages are measured in numbers that is the measure of equality. Proportionality is equality.

it is Not a Capital concept regardless of any mathematical computations required for the sake of accuracy, nothing more.

If you pay 25 cents for every dollar earned and I pay 25 cents for every dollar earned how is that not equal?

It does not reflect a progressive tax rate

If I pay 25 cents on every dollar and I need my paycheck to support a family, pay for healthcare and put a roof over my head
You pay 25 cents on every dollar and are a multimillionaire

We should not pay the same rate

Then the multimillionaire pays more in absolute dollars because he earns more.

$40,000 x 0.25 = $10,000

$1,000,000 x 0.25 = $250,000

see?

they pay more, with progressive taxation. see.

I agree, but then the others have less skin in the game and no motivation to care how nanny spends our money.

 

[danielpalos]

the equality should be in earning, not spending; anybody can spend.

Sure, when you produce the same you can earn the same.

capitalism needs Perfect information for that; we already know, the right wing is mostly full of fallacy.

why not fix the Goalposts at a simple minimum deemed appropriate for market participation.

Nope, the free market is Darwinian and needs no direction.

the "free market" died in 1929; socialism has been hard at work bailing out Capitalism, ever since.

Not exactly. We have managed markets. That's not socialism. Socialism sucks big green donkey dicks.

yes, it is socialism; Government intervention, is social-ism. Only the right wing is Always, that full of fallacy.