- Aug 4, 2009
- 283,040
- 150,043
- 2,615
As far as I bothered to readIt's a fact that Hunter was paid over $20M for doing nothing.
You have no idea of Hunters international dealings. He has decades of experience in the field
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
As far as I bothered to readIt's a fact that Hunter was paid over $20M for doing nothing.
We have no idea what Thomas discussed with his “friends”Was there a quid-pro-quo? What decisions did Clarence Thomas make as a result of this?
As far as I bothered to read
I can’t waste my time when you start with a blatant lieFor a while there, I thought you might be one of the adults on the board who could civilly and articulately have discussions with people whom you disagreed with.
My mistake.
Have fun.
You mean Biden?I consider a brazenly corrupt liar a "cartoon figure".
The difference is you insist on making stuff up.It's not hypocrisy. You'll see.
- It's a fact that Hunter was paid over $20M for doing nothing.
- The Biden's can't tell you what services they were selling, but Devon Archer confirmed it was access to Biden
- Hunter is on-record saying he paid the expenses of the entire family for years.
- When the subpoenas are granted to Biden's bank accounts, it will be crystal clear.
- You know Biden is guilty, but you put your politics above your integrity.
Was there a quid-pro-quo? What decisions did Clarence Thomas make as a result of this?
The quid-pro-quos of the Biden family are numerous, beyond substantial, admitted by Joe Biden himself (firing of prosecutor in exchange for $1B), and continue to this day (ban on mining Arizona uranium announced this week).
Big differences here.
Start a thread.You mean Biden?