Is Charlie Kirk the conservative version of George Floyd?

[Paddlefoot]

 

[Andrew_Jackson_FTW]

As we all know, the George Floyd incident sparked a wide range of support for the Left, is this what we are now witnessing on the right with Charlie?

I think that the George Floyd incident helped solidify the DNC coming into power in 2020.

But there are differences between the two incidents. For example, I don't remember those on the right lighting up social media celebrating the death of George Floyd, nor was George targeted for assassination. His death was an accident.

Nor does it really matter much what the leaders do and say in the DNC regarding this matter because people are being so disgusted with the animal like hate of Charlie after the assassination that they are leaving the party in droves.

The media and DNC that controls them, have been all brought to their knees by one Charlie Kirik as they are now powerless to stop their own demise that they have sown via hateful rhetoric.

And no Leftists, I'm not Hitler, nor am I a racist, homophobic, xenophobic misogynistic Taliban mutant from hell either

Thanks for asking.

Floyd had a major drug problem and possibly died not because of the police but because of his own issues. There is no comparing that at all to Charlie Kirk, who was murdered in cold blood … I’m not saying you’re saying this but that’s one big difference.

Floyd had a criminal history accused of holding a gun to a pregnant ladies stomach. Charlie Kirk of course led an exemplary life.

Not to mention as others have obviously pointed out the insane violence of the left-wing in response to George Floyd. Hundreds of riots over 500 of them after George Floyd. And not a single peep of violence from the right wing in response to Kirk. What a night and day difference.

But of course, the similarity is George Floyd galvanized a portion of the left wing. Well, Charlie will do the same thing with the right wing. And it’s just so sad to see how the left wing looks up to people that it looks up to today. It’s disgrace to the Democrats of history.

 

[Billiejeens]

The pigs didn't kill Charlie

Or floyd

 

[Billiejeens]

There weren't 3 days of riots in Charlie Kirk's hometown of Phoenix Az.

And that why the good guys will never win

 

[Monoculturalist]

And that why the good guys will never win

I disagree. The fact that the right is less violent about these things is what wins over many moderates. So much of the left's behavior in recent months has only pushed "regular" people toward the right.

 

[Billiejeens]

I disagree. The fact that the right is less violent about these things is what wins over many moderates. So much of the left's behavior in recent months has only pushed "regular" people toward the right.

That's nice.

 

[HikerGuy83]

As we all know, the George Floyd incident sparked a wide range of support for the Left, is this what we are now witnessing on the right with Charlie?

I think that the George Floyd incident helped solidify the DNC coming into power in 2020.

But there are differences between the two incidents. For example, I don't remember those on the right lighting up social media celebrating the death of George Floyd, nor was George targeted for assassination. His death was an accident.

Nor does it really matter much what the leaders do and say in the DNC regarding this matter because people are being so disgusted with the animal like hate of Charlie after the assassination that they are leaving the party in droves.

The media and DNC that controls them, have been all brought to their knees by one Charlie Kirik as they are now powerless to stop their own demise that they have sown via hateful rhetoric.

And no Leftists, I'm not Hitler, nor am I a racist, homophobic, xenophobic misogynistic Taliban mutant from hell either

Thanks for asking.

Floyd was a criminal who pointed a gun at the belly of pregnant woman.

Kirk was a man with a young family who was interested in keeping young people engaged.

So NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO.

There is nothing about them that is alike.

 

[HikerGuy83]

George Floyd should not be included in the same sentence or context with Charlie Kirk. There is zero relationship between the two events or how people have responded to them.

Amen

 

[TemplarKormac]

The pigs didn't kill Charlie

Yes, yes they did.

There's no need for you to behave like one, however.

 

[Blaster]

There weren't 3 days of riots in Charlie Kirk's hometown of Phoenix Az.

MAGA doesn't riot.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

As we all know, the George Floyd incident sparked a wide range of support for the Left, is this what we are now witnessing on the right with Charlie?

I think that the George Floyd incident helped solidify the DNC coming into power in 2020.

But there are differences between the two incidents. For example, I don't remember those on the right lighting up social media celebrating the death of George Floyd, nor was George targeted for assassination. His death was an accident.

Nor does it really matter much what the leaders do and say in the DNC regarding this matter because people are being so disgusted with the animal like hate of Charlie after the assassination that they are leaving the party in droves.

The media and DNC that controls them, have been all brought to their knees by one Charlie Kirik as they are now powerless to stop their own demise that they have sown via hateful rhetoric.

And no Leftists, I'm not Hitler, nor am I a racist, homophobic, xenophobic misogynistic Taliban mutant from hell either

Thanks for asking.

No. You're an idiot.

 

[Votto]

Floyd had a major drug problem and possibly died not because of the police but because of his own issues. There is no comparing that at all to Charlie Kirk, who was murdered in cold blood … I’m not saying you’re saying this but that’s one big difference.

Floyd had a criminal history accused of holding a gun to a pregnant ladies stomach. Charlie Kirk of course led an exemplary life.

Not to mention as others have obviously pointed out the insane violence of the left-wing in response to George Floyd. Hundreds of riots over 500 of them after George Floyd. And not a single peep of violence from the right wing in response to Kirk. What a night and day difference.

But of course, the similarity is George Floyd galvanized a portion of the left wing. Well, Charlie will do the same thing with the right wing. And it’s just so sad to see how the left wing looks up to people that it looks up to today. It’s disgrace to the Democrats of history.

All good points, but I think they are similar in that they are both turning point events politically.

 

[Andrew_Jackson_FTW]

No. You're an idiot.

Incredible insight.!!!

Old Tumblin …some things never change. Can’t wait for your next one liner no substance post.

 

[Doc7505]

They’re not even remotely similar.

Floyd was the victim of state violence and there was a lot of doubt as to whether his killer would be charged or convicted. Even now, a lot of republicans believe that his murderer was innocent.

No one doubts that Kirk’s killer will be prosecuted to the fullest degree and found guilty.

~~~~~~>

Charlie Kirk, George Floyd, and​

EVERYTHING Different About the Left and the Right​

Charlie Kirk, George Floyd, and EVERYTHING Different About the Left and the Right

Exploring the stark differences in reactions from the left and right after two tragic deaths.

pjmedia.com

15 Sep 2025 ~~ By Scott Pinsker

A large part of me feels filthy comparing the two because Charlie Kirk doesn’t deserve for anyone to lump him into the same category as George Floyd. Even if we accept the central thesis of the Black Lives Matter movement — that George Floyd was murdered in a senseless act of police violence — the circumstances between the two were extraordinarily different, and no one should lose sight of why:
George Floyd was convicted of eight separate crimes between 1997 and 2005 alone. (It’s unclear how many times he was arrested.) In 2007, he was sentenced to four years in prison for aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. On May 25, 2020 — the day he lost his life while police officer Derek Chauvin handcuffed him — he was in the process of being arrested (yet again) for ripping off a convenience store with counterfeit money.
~Snip~
In stark contrast, Charlie Kirk didn’t have a criminal record or a violent past. He dedicated himself to promoting his political beliefs and testifying about his faith in Christ, traveling throughout the U.S. heartland, having civil, peaceful discussions with Americans of every walk of life. Conservative or liberal, Christian or atheist, straight or gay, white or black, he was willing to speak with anyone and everyone.
~Snip~
On the left, George Floyd was “honored” with protests and/or riots in over 2,000 U.S. cities and over 60 countries. Sadly, none all of them were peaceful.
It was the most expensive violent protest in U.S. history, Axios reported:
“Mostly peaceful” is a very curious standard. Charlie Kirk was murdered, after all, in a “mostly peaceful” event, where just one person fired a weapon.
Of course, if 93% of the protests were peaceful, that means that hundreds upon hundreds were not. By their own numbers, there were approximately 220 violent riots!
When ACLED broke down the stats more comprehensively, the number of violent protests jumped to about 570:
~Snip~
Imagine that: The left keeps blaming Trump for inciting a “dangerous” conservative reaction after Charlie Kirk’s death, when there still hasn’t been ANY violence at all!

​

It’s an astonishing contrast: One side rioted, killed dozens of people, and torched, looted, and destroyed their cities.
The other side went to church and prayed to God.
Conservatives and liberals? The two are not the same.
One Last Thing: The Democrats are on the ropes, but make no mistake: The donkeys are still dangerous. 2025 will either go down in history as the year we finally Made America Great Again — or the year it all slipped through our fingers.

Commentary:
First the death of career thug George Floyd was not murder, it was accidental.
The contrast between the violent reaction of Democrat Socialists of America as compared to how conservatives are handling the assassination of Charlie Kirk is dramatically different as between night and day.
Strangely, It's Democrat Socialists of America that continues to blame Trump for inciting "Dangerous" Conservative reaction to Charlie Kirk's assassination, while there
hasn't been Any violence at all, except from the DSA Left in planting failed explosive devices under press vehicles, or desecrating memorial sites.

 

[OODA_Loop]

George Floyd could have prevented his own death.

Charlie Kirk could not.

 

[Marener]

First the death of career thug George Floyd was not murder, it was accidental.

A man sat on his chest while he slowly suffocated, scoffing at the idea that he could be in any physical distress.

It demonstrated the lack of value America places on the lives of black men.