Is Bondi blowing the Epstein Investigation intentionally?

CrusaderFrank

OK, Ima cut Blondi a little smidge of slack....Not much, but a smidge....

1746981288796.webp
 
So James O’Keefe first “I’m not suicidal and am going off grid ‘Bombshell’” was having Pam Bondi recorded at a restaurant telling a random person that they were reviewing “tens of thousands of hours of tapes of Epstein with young girls”

On Wednesday Bondi came out publicly (after OMG sent her the recording) and said essentially the same thing

So what?!

Epstein is dead!

What about his clients?

Who is unaliving the current witnesses?

Will link to the OMG announcement

Dafuq is Bondi wasting her time on a dead guy?
They are watching tens of thousands of hours of sex tapes?

Perhaps Bondi's frigging finger is tired or she ran out of vibrator batteries.
 
Last edited:
No.
.

No one is blowing the Epstein investigation.

It must be handled carefully. The subject is a gang of people who sell children for sex and other heinous purposes, and if someone gets arrested, the rest of his cohorts will panic and want to destroy evidence, as in dumping their inventory, as in killing children. Trump's administration is undoubtedly saving very many young lives by being careful.


.
No. She's slow walking it because Trump is implicated in the reports. She's trying to find a way to sanitize it. :)
 
Lefties love Epstein.

Anyone who helps adults fuck children is a hero to left wing sickos.
Trump an Epstein raped a 13 year old girl and you just think that is funny Simp.
Enough with your screwed up faux moral outrage and projection you cultist.
 
.

No one is blowing the Epstein investigation.

It must be handled carefully. The subject is a gang of people who sell children for sex and other heinous purposes, and if someone gets arrested, the rest of his cohorts will panic and want to destroy evidence, as in dumping their inventory, as in killing children. Trump's administration is undoubtedly saving very many young lives by being careful.


.
They’ve been destroying the evidence for a decade now
 
What about THIS?

A woman whose identity is being protected has filed a civil lawsuit against Donald Trump and billionaire Jeffrey Epstein (a convicted sex offender) accusing them of raping her in 1994, when she was thirteen years old. The mainstream media have been almost unanimously silent about this.


Not only is there no proof, but waiting 9 years to come forward shows a totally unreliable character.
 
Who is "y'all?"
This is a legal, official court document filed by a woman whom Epstein and Trump are accused of raping when sbe was 13.
What's the matter?
Inconvenient truths causing cognitive dissonance in you?

Waiting 9 years, she is the one who should be charged.
And what sort of proof is she going to present?
 
Victims can be blocked out, etc, etc, etc. Names and faces of the guilty can be shown w/o compromising younsters
I'm losing faith in this more every day

The information was all accumulated by Epstein, so could all be intentional hoaxes intended for extortion purposes, and it not legally presentable in court or to the public.
 
No, of course she isnt. Why would she? She has no connection or loyalty to anyone Epstein related.

Im not an investigator or a US attorney, but im wise enough to know that there are tricks and procedures involved in major investigations. Why give us videos of high profile people right now, while they are still trying to catch tons of other people? They build a case against one dude caught on film, then get him to roll over on other people, then they create a domino effect using the same shakedown technique on each new lead. That shit takes time. It will likely take a couple years.

Actually there is no real evidence of any crime.

Here is what Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted of:
{...
Her sentencing is tied to convictions on three counts: sex trafficking, conspiracy, and enticing a minor to travel across state lines for the purposes of illegal sex.
...}

First of all, "trafficking" is not and never can be a crime, no matter what the purpose is for.
Second is that "conspiracy" is just a nasty sounding word that is totally meaningless.
And as to "minors", historically and most of the world, places the "age of consent" to be around 12 to 13, so our use of 18 clearly is a violation of religious freedom.

So clearly the charges are totally bogus.
The only time sex is criminal is when it is forced or with threats.
 
Back
Top Bottom