Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Do you pay over $200,000 per week like this worker does?No I do not. I pay my fair share of taxes, I think everyone else should as well.
www.outkick.com
This sounds like Communism. That the money in circulation is the property of the feds and not those earning the cash. Matter of fact, there are many NFL players paying upwards of $200,000 per week and it is they who get injured on the job.Collecting taxes on corporate profit serves the public interest by providing revenue for the government to function. Corporations that operate against the public's interests beg for their licenses to be revoked.
Do you pay over $200,000 per week like this worker does?
Arik Armstead Shares Game Check, Shows Nearly 50% Comes Out In Taxes
If you think you pay too much in taxes, wait until you see this paycheck from Arik Armstead — who ponies up 50% every pay period.
here's a solution, simplify the tax code and if someone thinks there is a loophole, close it through the legislative process.
As Armstead points out, you do not need to live in CA to get hit with staggering taxes. But you must not get it. He pays a super high federal tax and it is presumed you call that fair. Yet you do not get billed several hundred thousand dollars per week. Why don't you care?I do not, but then again I do not live in Cali and we are not talking about state income tax
As Armstead points out, you do not need to live in CA to get hit with staggering taxes. But you must not get it. He pays a super high federal tax and it is presumed you call that fair. Yet you do not get billed several hundred thousand dollars per week. Why don't you care?
He points out that visiting teams are nailed enormous taxes by the state merely for a short visit to CA just to play a game.
Well, in your view, since he labors during games, just how much is fair for a black who shoves men around for a living be charged for his efforts? Would you give him back say 99 percent of his revenue?We know how much is withheld, we do not know how much he gets back at the end of the year when he actually files his taxes.
Well, in your view, since he labors during games, just how much is fair for a black who shoves men around for a living be charged for his efforts? Would you give him back say 99 percent of his revenue?
I see how you operate. If I merely bring up his race, to you it is racist. But when you do it, you are just informing the forum?what is fair is that he pays what the law says he has to pay.
What does his skin color have to do with anything? Is there any topic you do not let your racist self shine though on?
What color do you believe the player is? And don't you promote the term black victimhood? I urge you support this black who is enormously overcharged merely because of his labor is that of shoving around adult men.what is fair is that he pays what the law says he has to pay.
What does his skin color have to do with anything? Is there any topic you do not let your racist self shine though on?
I see how you operate. If I merely bring up his race, to you it is racist. But when you do it, you are just informing the forum?
What color do you believe the player is?
I urge you support this black
No that he is not. Being black is not a crime. Why do you presume he is a criminal?What other reason is there for bringing it up?
Can you find an example of me bringing up race when it is 100% irrelevant to the discussion?
I do not care what color the skin is of this player as it is not relevant to the discussion in any way, shape or form.
This black what? Even when you are trying to pretend you are not a racist piece of shit your own words give you away. To you he is not even a person, he is just a "black"
No that he is not. Being black is not a crime. Why do you presume he is a criminal?
Look, you are fucked up. Don't blame me for your personal form of bigotry.
We know how much is withheld, we do not know how much he gets back at the end of the year when he actually files his taxes.
But we do not do that, we the people keep voting in people that spend way more money than we have. You yourself keeps voting for people that spend more than we have.
Collecting taxes on corporate profit serves the public interest by providing revenue for the government to function. Corporations that operate against the public's interests beg for their licenses to be revoked.
I say "taxes on corporate profit" and your haywire brain goes straight to "NFL players". Face it, you are insane.This sounds like Communism. That the money in circulation is the property of the feds and not those earning the cash. Matter of fact, there are many NFL players paying upwards of $200,000 per week and it is they who get injured on the job.
What happens to the public when corporations pay taxes? Guess????I say "taxes on corporate profit" and your haywire brain goes straight to "NFL players". Face it, you are insane.
Considering the binary system, I vote for the ones that keep the increase lower.
You enable the spendthrifts and the collectivists.
If this nation purged the Government of Democrats, the taxes and spending would fall like sand in the wind.neither do that. That is the problem.
no, you do by your vote of approval in the ballot box.
Based upon your previous insanity? They play football.What happens to the public when corporations pay taxes? Guess????
Corporations raise prices and the public ends up paying the taxes charged to corporations. Besides that Corporations are double taxed. The owners pay extra taxes above that the corporations pay.Based upon your previous insanity? They play football.
