Iran is a long way from a viable nuclear missile AND they are a nuclear threat right now.

MarathonMike

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2014
Messages
60,867
Reaction score
91,067
Points
3,645
Location
The Southwestern Desert
Two things can be true at once. The Iranians have demonstrated a lack of technical prowess in weaponizing the enriched material they have into a deliverable nuclear missile. So Tulsi was probably right about their nuclear MISSILE capability. But Iran could certainly fashion "dirty bombs" with the enriched material they have which would cause a lot of death and destruction. IMO that is the biggest threat from Iran right now as a desperate 86 year old Ayatollah might just green light dirty bombs.
 
Two things can be true at once. The Iranians have demonstrated a lack of technical prowess in weaponizing the enriched material they have into a deliverable nuclear missile. So Tulsi was probably right about their nuclear MISSILE capability. But Iran could certainly fashion "dirty bombs" with the enriched material they have which would cause a lot of death and destruction. IMO that is the biggest threat from Iran right now as a desperate 86 year old Ayatollah might just green light dirty bombs.
The problem isn't Iran accurately launching missiles with nukes on them.

Iran wants to make a nuke so somebody can carry the thing into Europe, London, or New York and set it off from inside a van.

And it doesn't take any accuracy to launch a 2 stage missile and blow it up at high altitude over the United States. The EMP alone will send us back to the Dark Ages.
 
Two things can be true at once. The Iranians have demonstrated a lack of technical prowess in weaponizing the enriched material they have into a deliverable nuclear missile. So Tulsi was probably right about their nuclear MISSILE capability. But Iran could certainly fashion "dirty bombs" with the enriched material they have which would cause a lot of death and destruction. IMO that is the biggest threat from Iran right now as a desperate 86 year old Ayatollah might just green light dirty bombs.


Its also impossible to find peace with the Mullas. They are not interested in our western concepts of trade and international commerce as a way of coming together and finding common ground. 1st and formost with them is their belief that Israel needs to be wiped out before their prophecy of the 12th Imam can come to pass and the world falls into order of islam. I think they have no other alternatives or deny their very own existence.
 
The problem isn't Iran accurately launching missiles with nukes on them.

Iran wants to make a nuke so somebody can carry the thing into Europe, London, or New York and set it off from inside a van.

And it doesn't take any accuracy to launch a 2 stage missile and blow it up at high altitude over the United States. The EMP alone will send us back to the Dark Ages.
Yes, that is more likely what Iran could do. Fashion a crude delivery system not even in a missile. The question is, does Fordow contain ALL of Iran's enriched nuclear material or could they be stockpiling it in multiple locations?
 
Two things can be true at once. The Iranians have demonstrated a lack of technical prowess in weaponizing the enriched material they have into a deliverable nuclear missile. So Tulsi was probably right about their nuclear MISSILE capability. But Iran could certainly fashion "dirty bombs" with the enriched material they have which would cause a lot of death and destruction. IMO that is the biggest threat from Iran right now as a desperate 86 year old Ayatollah might just green light dirty bombs.
So you're saying someone in their 80s is willing to make crazy decisions and do something which will adversely affect all of us?

Hmmm...interesting.
 
Yes, that is more likely what Iran could do. Fashion a crude delivery system not even in a missile. The question is, does Fordow contain ALL of Iran's enriched nuclear material or could they be stockpiling it in multiple locations?
Until Clinton sold them the technology for multi-stage missiles, China didn't have the technology to hit American cities.
 
The problem isn't Iran accurately launching missiles with nukes on them.

Iran wants to make a nuke so somebody can carry the thing into Europe, London, or New York and set it off from inside a van.

And it doesn't take any accuracy to launch a 2 stage missile and blow it up at high altitude over the United States. The EMP alone will send us back to the Dark Ages.

I don't think their bombs are big enough for a nationwide EMP, you need something in the 10's of megatons for that.
 
Israel knocking off half a dozen nuclear scientists must have set the crooked little regime back. Funny how the American left hates Catholics but tolerates ultra fundamentalist dangerous Muslem countries.
 
Two things can be true at once. The Iranians have demonstrated a lack of technical prowess in weaponizing the enriched material they have into a deliverable nuclear missile. So Tulsi was probably right about their nuclear MISSILE capability. But Iran could certainly fashion "dirty bombs" with the enriched material they have which would cause a lot of death and destruction. IMO that is the biggest threat from Iran right now as a desperate 86 year old Ayatollah might just green light dirty bombs.


1750355794159.webp
 
I don't think their bombs are big enough for a nationwide EMP, you need something in the 10's of megatons for that.
If they're accurate enough to explode them over the grid in strategic locations....they can turn major cities into dead zones.....almost as effectively as Democrat rioters and shoplifters.

Democrats (and possibly Iranians) are pretty good at turning cities into wastelands where there's no food or running water for miles.

Imagine large parts of the country uninhabitable because there's no electricity to recharge your EVs and your cell phones.

I think this is one of the reasons Obama gave billions to the mullahs in Iran.
 
Last edited:
The problem isn't Iran accurately launching missiles with nukes on them.

Iran wants to make a nuke so somebody can carry the thing into Europe, London, or New York and set it off from inside a van.


And it doesn't take any accuracy to launch a 2 stage missile and blow it up at high altitude over the United States. The EMP alone will send us back to the Dark Ages.
Naw. Why would Iran want to do that? Im sure they would only want to bomb Israel with it.

Stuff like that is what the Jew-owned media want you to think. They want you to think Iran is a threat to you so that you will stop them, when in fact they want you to stop them because Iran is Israel's enemy.
 
Naw. Why would Iran want to do that? Im sure they would only want to bomb Israel with it.

Stuff like that is what the Jew-owned media want you to think. They want you to think Iran is a threat to you so that you will stop them, when in fact they want you to stop them because Iran is Israel's enemy.
Try reading some history. Iran is the world's enemy. They are just very clever cowards as they fund and weaponize proxies all over the world to rain down terror.
 
15th post
Two things can be true at once. The Iranians have demonstrated a lack of technical prowess in weaponizing the enriched material they have into a deliverable nuclear missile. So Tulsi was probably right about their nuclear MISSILE capability. But Iran could certainly fashion "dirty bombs" with the enriched material they have which would cause a lot of death and destruction. IMO that is the biggest threat from Iran right now as a desperate 86 year old Ayatollah might just green light dirty bombs.
tRump just made that much more likely, I'll grant you that.
 
Naw. Why would Iran want to do that? Im sure they would only want to bomb Israel with it.

Stuff like that is what the Jew-owned media want you to think. They want you to think Iran is a threat to you so that you will stop them, when in fact they want you to stop them because Iran is Israel's enemy.
Iran hasn't been attacking just Israel....but anyone who stands in their way.
They've been attacking us since 79'.
 
Back
Top Bottom