The argument was that these laws are unconstitutional. Clearly they are not. Your opinion isn't worth the time it took you to write it.
I guess that depends on whether you consider the judges to be the greater authority on what is or is not Constitutional, or whether you consider the Constitution itself to be the greater authority.
You can read the Constitution for yourself, and see what is written therein. By design, it is written to be easily read and understood by the common man, and not as the exclusive domain of elite judges.
Now I think that common sense dictates that if you read the Constitution itself, and can see that it clearly, explicitly, unambiguously says one thing, and you listen to a judge telling you that it says something different, that is irreconcilable with what you just read yourself; that the judge is wrong.
It is only arrogance and hubris on the part of judges, and ignorance and cowardice on the part of foolish people such as yourself, that allows this sort of abuse to take place.