progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 64,527
- 39,384
- 2,615
of what??So, you approve.OMG!! people were terrorized??When the conservative Supreme Court ruled no knock warrants constitutional I knew the problems that would come with this. It was a very irresponsible ruling especially since in my opinion it violates the second amendment.
This time no one was physically hurt but the house was damaged with the residents terrorized by the police.
The thing is, if the police had actually done their job, they would have known that they were raiding the wrong house. They had the real address of the criminal they were looking for but they were just too lazy to do their jobs correctly.
As a result, innocent people were terrorized.
If I lived in that house I would be looking for the meanest lawyer I could find to sue the police department and cops so that they're bankrupt. Maybe the people of Minnesota will wake up to what is happening and finally put a stop to it. Or maybe not. If not the people of Minnesota are going to keep getting sued and having to pay out countless millions of dollars that the city and state can't afford to pay.
KARE 11 Investigates: Innocent MN family held at gunpoint in SWAT no-knock warrant raid
Mother and child terrorized in bungled no-knock warrant raid. A KARE 11 investigation reveals Minneapolis police failed basic checks and hit the wrong address.www.kare11.com
say it aint so,,,