therealtylerbaker
Rookie
- Nov 10, 2021
- 4
- 1
- 1
I believe I have figured out where the information went and possibly how we can find it and measure it, and confirm (potentially indirectly) where it went and how much.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No (but I’d rather have discovered that!Huh ? Are you talking about Clinton's emails ?
Stephen Hawking after years of stating that information was destroyed in a black-hole reversed that theory stating that not all information was destroyed and it may be possible to retrieve it.No (but I’d rather have discovered that!)
no, I am referring to the Information Paradox of Stephen Hawking’s. Harvard has a Black Hole Institute (BHI) working on it for a long time and they are STUMPED.
I have the solution 100%.
I’ve emailed multiple people there and at Templeton (funding BHI)….no response
Wrong. He did not “reverse” AT ALL. You need to research it. He agreed that extremely small amounts of radiation remained (which you referred to). But rest is in the black hole And don’t know how to know. But it’s not enough energy and thermodynamics still says you cannot destroy energy. That’s the paradox. Need to account for the “remaining “ lost energy to clear laws of thermodynamicsStephen Hawking after years of stating that information was destroyed in a black-hole reversed that theory stating that not all information was destroyed and it may be possible to retrieve it.
Wrong. He did not “reverse” AT ALL. You need to research it. He agreed that extremely small amounts of radiation remained (which you referred to). But rest is in the black hole And don’t know how to know. But it’s not enough energy and thermodynamics still says you cannot destroy energy. That’s the paradox. Need to account for the “remaining “ lost energy to clear laws of thermodynamics
Ok man. Stop replying to this thread. Black hole information evaporation vs preserving has NOTHING to do with this! It is precisely the preservation conundrum, which resulted, that I am addressing!!!Starting in the mid-1970s, Stephen Hawking and Jacob Bekenstein put forward theoretical arguments based on general relativity and quantum field theory that not only appeared to be inconsistent with information conservation but which did not account for the information loss and which stated no reason for it. Specifically, Hawking's calculations[5] indicated that black hole evaporation via Hawking radiation does not preserve information. Today, many physicists believe that the holographic principle (specifically the AdS/CFT duality) demonstrates that Hawking's conclusion was incorrect, and that information is in fact preserved.[6] In 2004 Hawking himself conceded a bet he had made, agreeing that black hole evaporation does in fact preserve information.![]()
Black hole information paradox - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org