Indicting Hillary would be Stupid

[william the wie]

The FBI can revoke her Security clearance without the AG or a special prosecutor. That would destroy her politically. Why do something that is complicated and might backfire when there is a surefire way to destroy her?

 

[g5000]

Instead of offering solutions to the serious issues facing our country, we should instead attack the Clintons for...ohhhhhh...let's sayyyyy...25 years.

That oughta obliterate them! THEN we can maybe...but only maybe...think about how we can get out of these messes we keep getting ourselves into.

 

[miketx]

Criminal politicians is a serious issue facing our country.

 

[The Rabbi]

Instead of offering solutions to the serious issues facing our country, we should instead attack the Clintons for...ohhhhhh...let's sayyyyy...25 years.

That oughta obliterate them! THEN we can maybe...but only maybe...think about how we can get out of these messes we keep getting ourselves into.

Until we get serious about getting the corrupt out of politics we wont solve any problems.

 

[g5000]

Instead of offering solutions to the serious issues facing our country, we should instead attack the Clintons for...ohhhhhh...let's sayyyyy...25 years.

That oughta obliterate them! THEN we can maybe...but only maybe...think about how we can get out of these messes we keep getting ourselves into.

Until we get serious about getting the corrupt out of politics we wont solve any problems.

You get rid of the corrupt people by offering better solutions than they have.

The GOP methodology since Reagan left office has been to deny there is a problem, or to attack the Democratic plan to conceal the fact they have nothing.

 

[Rambunctious]

The FBI can revoke her Security clearance without the AG or a special prosecutor. That would destroy her politically. Why do something that is complicated and might backfire when there is a surefire way to destroy her?

Because sooner or later one way or another we have to get back to the rule of law in this country. If you break the law you need to be punished no matter who you are. No matter who you're married to and no matter what you do for a living. Otherwise we will end up with total lawlessness at the top. Not good for us folks in the middle and at the bottom.

 

[Bassman007]

Criminal politicians is a serious issue facing our country.

Criminal politicians is redundant

 

[william the wie]

The FBI can revoke her Security clearance without the AG or a special prosecutor. That would destroy her politically. Why do something that is complicated and might backfire when there is a surefire way to destroy her?

Because sooner or later one way or another we have to get back to the rule of law in this country. If you break the law you need to be punished no matter who you are. No matter who you're married to and no matter what you do for a living. Otherwise we will end up with total lawlessness at the top. Not good for us folks in the middle and at the bottom.

Look up the Cook County voting totals: 1932 FDR and 1960 JFK were most certainly bought and paid for elections, even though in the first case it was massive and totally unnecessary overkill. That horse escaped the barn long, long ago.

 

[Rambunctious]

That horse escaped the barn long, long ago.

Time to round that pony up.....Vote Trump!

 

[Vigilante]

Criminal politicians is a serious issue facing our country.

Criminal politicians is redundant

 

[Jackson]

Why have laws for a segment of the population and not the other? It's time the Clintons and other politicians realize they are not ABOVE the law.

 

[IsaacNewton]

The worst that will happen is all Secretarys of State for the last 20 years will be chastised for using personal email but no crimes committed. Cons you have again, as you continually do, listened to the vomit-mouths on the reicht and believed something will happen. It won't. There were no crimes unless you count the 40 million dollars plus that Republicons have spent on cynical self-serving political witch hunts. Republicons have become adept at wasting taxpayer money.

 

[oreo]

The FBI can revoke her Security clearance without the AG or a special prosecutor. That would destroy her politically. Why do something that is complicated and might backfire when there is a surefire way to destroy her?

If they're going to indict Hillary Clinton, they'll have to indict Colin Powell and Condi Rice--(both former Secretary's of State) for the same email issues.
Rice Aides, Powell Also Got Classified Info on Personal Email Accounts

IOW--it's not going to happen, and NO they aren't going to toss her security clearance.

In fact, it's questionable that Donald Trump can get security clearance.
Can Trump Get a Security Clearance?

Bernie Sanders praising Fidel Castro would also be a problem in him obtaining top level security clearance.
Bernie Sanders heaped praise on Fidel Castro in 1985 interview

 

[Clementine]

The FBI can revoke her Security clearance without the AG or a special prosecutor. That would destroy her politically. Why do something that is complicated and might backfire when there is a surefire way to destroy her?

She can't be trusted with classified information so it's a joke that she has clearance. The only secret information she cares about protecting is her own.

 

[Clementine]

If they're going to indict Hillary Clinton, they'll have to indict Colin Powell and Condi Rice--(both former Secretary's of State) for the same email issues.
Rice Aides, Powell Also Got Classified Info on Personal Email Accounts

IOW--it's not going to happen, and NO they aren't going to toss her security clearance.

In fact, it's questionable that Donald Trump can get security clearance.
Can Trump Get a Security Clearance?

Bernie Sanders praising Fidel Castro would also be a problem in him obtaining top level security clearance.
Bernie Sanders heaped praise on Fidel Castro in 1985 interview

Whaa! This is different because Hillary was told it was no longer allowed. It used to be done but times have changed and with hackers being better than ever, it just isn't safe any more. Even when it was clear that her server was not secure enough to stop hackers, she continues.

Face it, Hillary is a special kind of stupid and was only concerned about the State Dept. not seeing her emails.

If the left had been worried before, or if those people had done something wrong, we all know the Dems would have formed a lynch mob and gone after them.

 

[Esmeralda]

The worst that will happen is all Secretarys of State for the last 20 years will be chastised for using personal email but no crimes committed. Cons you have again, as you continually do, listened to the vomit-mouths on the reicht and believed something will happen. It won't. There were no crimes unless you count the 40 million dollars plus that Republicons have spent on cynical self-serving political witch hunts. Republicons have become adept at wasting taxpayer money.

Rice and Powell did exactly the same thing Clinton did regarding e-mails and no one has prosecuted them, or even investigated them. Total double standard. Persecution by the right-wing.

 

[oreo]

The FBI can revoke her Security clearance without the AG or a special prosecutor. That would destroy her politically. Why do something that is complicated and might backfire when there is a surefire way to destroy her?

She can't be trusted with classified information so it's a joke that she has clearance. The only secret information she cares about protecting is her own.

There is no one that has been investigated as much as the Clinton's over the last 20 years. Each and every time these investigations come up empty handed.

It's really turned into a waste of taxpayer dollars for nothing more than the Reich wing dog and pony shows.

 

[oreo]

If they're going to indict Hillary Clinton, they'll have to indict Colin Powell and Condi Rice--(both former Secretary's of State) for the same email issues.
Rice Aides, Powell Also Got Classified Info on Personal Email Accounts

IOW--it's not going to happen, and NO they aren't going to toss her security clearance.

In fact, it's questionable that Donald Trump can get security clearance.
Can Trump Get a Security Clearance?

Bernie Sanders praising Fidel Castro would also be a problem in him obtaining top level security clearance.
Bernie Sanders heaped praise on Fidel Castro in 1985 interview

Whaa! This is different because Hillary was told it was no longer allowed. It used to be done but times have changed and with hackers being better than ever, it just isn't safe any more. Even when it was clear that her server was not secure enough to stop hackers, she continues.

Face it, Hillary is a special kind of stupid and was only concerned about the State Dept. not seeing her emails.

If the left had been worried before, or if those people had done something wrong, we all know the Dems would have formed a lynch mob and gone after them.

Are you going to refer to Condi Rice & Colin Powell as stupid also? This is about politics, and that's all it's about. The inspector General has a set of rules to be followed, it's not just for Democrats to follow with another set written for Republicans.

I imagine there are thousands of government officials that are receiving government information from their staffers on their personal "unsecure" email accounts that should not be happening. Who I blame in regards to Hillary Clinton, is the SENIOR IT staffer at the State Department that set up her email server, who was granted immunity from the FBI to keep his own ass out of hot water.

Here are a few STATE DEPARTMENT HACKS: Now who is the stupid one here? Who are you going to blame for the below?

July 11, 2006:

State Department Computers Hacked

NOV. 24, 2015:

Iranian Hackers Attack State Dept. via Social Media Accounts

November 17, 2014:

State Department Computers Hacked

Mar 10, 2015:

Sources: State Dept Hack the 'worst ever' - CNNPolitics.com

I really don't think there's anything that can't be hacked anymore.

 

[Claudette]

The FBI can revoke her Security clearance without the AG or a special prosecutor. That would destroy her politically. Why do something that is complicated and might backfire when there is a surefire way to destroy her?

No one will indict Hitlery for anything. She won't be held any more accountable for her e-mails then she was for her incompetence at Benghazi.

Anyone thinking anything else is in for disappointment.

 

[Bassman007]

The FBI can revoke her Security clearance without the AG or a special prosecutor. That would destroy her politically. Why do something that is complicated and might backfire when there is a surefire way to destroy her?

No one will indict Hitlery for anything. She won't be held any more accountable for her e-mails then she was for her incompetence at Benghazi.

Anyone thinking anything else is in for disappointment.

This is not just about e-mails anymore, this has graduated to racketeering as well.