Scrolling up took me to the top of this page where you had no posts, no less one with a statute number.
Mundane.Wind may have a problem coming up with a valid argument.
Shakedown Cruise1.1%. How much do you want to bet it'll be back up this time next week?United stock took a huge dive today
I've long thought their service sucked.
The usual sucker play at the Wall Street casino. House money creates a panic to drive down the price, buys low, and smirks as the price goes back up to a natural value.
Nothing but diversion instead of a valid argument, is quite, mundane.Wind.How old are you? 20ish? Because you act like this kid....
Apparently the Wind's new strategy is to claim "I already cited that, you missed it'.
That's why I put a post number on mine. Which he's avoiding as inconvenient.
"we have a handful of extreme left wing members here who feel that if they get the last word in, that they've won some kind of victory. I call them "mic drop Liberals". They'll deny every fact, every link presented and when someone gives up on them as a lost cause, these "mic drop Liberals" declare victory by default and drop their mic.
They seem to truly believe that if they say something long enough, that it becomes true. Odd, yes, but that's what they do."
are there no extra crew seats available for larger crews?
how about, standby standing harnesses that can be attached to a bulkhead?
Isn't that enough?Nothing but diversion instead of a valid argument, is quite, mundane.Wind.How old are you? 20ish? Because you act like this kid....
Apparently the Wind's new strategy is to claim "I already cited that, you missed it'.
That's why I put a post number on mine. Which he's avoiding as inconvenient.
"we have a handful of extreme left wing members here who feel that if they get the last word in, that they've won some kind of victory. I call them "mic drop Liberals". They'll deny every fact, every link presented and when someone gives up on them as a lost cause, these "mic drop Liberals" declare victory by default and drop their mic.
They seem to truly believe that if they say something long enough, that it becomes true. Odd, yes, but that's what they do."
What exigency was there to forcibly remove a passenger, under our form of Capitalism, besides the "bottom line"?
Employees doing as they were told.
Europe's Ryanair and China are already looking at something like that: The SkyRider perching saddle --enjoy your flight!
Geez. I expect trolling from the usual twits, but not you Daniel. Shame on you.
That's not trolling. He's right. You ridiculously claim Dao broke a law which prompted the airline to call security to come in and remove Dao from the plane; But you're incapable of citing the specific statute number you claim he violated. So no, you don't have a valid argument. You know it like everyone else here knows it.
No, the bottom line is not a reason to use force; unless you are in Teapot Dome.Isn't that enough?Nothing but diversion instead of a valid argument, is quite, mundane.Wind.How old are you? 20ish? Because you act like this kid....
Apparently the Wind's new strategy is to claim "I already cited that, you missed it'.
That's why I put a post number on mine. Which he's avoiding as inconvenient.
"we have a handful of extreme left wing members here who feel that if they get the last word in, that they've won some kind of victory. I call them "mic drop Liberals". They'll deny every fact, every link presented and when someone gives up on them as a lost cause, these "mic drop Liberals" declare victory by default and drop their mic.
They seem to truly believe that if they say something long enough, that it becomes true. Odd, yes, but that's what they do."
What exigency was there to forcibly remove a passenger, under our form of Capitalism, besides the "bottom line"?
You claim I'm deranged, so why do you keep caring what I say?
You're ******* deranged.
Who said force? Besides you, I mean. You asked "No, the bottom line is not a reason to use force; unless you are in Teapot Dome.Isn't that enough?Nothing but diversion instead of a valid argument, is quite, mundane.Wind.How old are you? 20ish? Because you act like this kid....
Apparently the Wind's new strategy is to claim "I already cited that, you missed it'.
That's why I put a post number on mine. Which he's avoiding as inconvenient.
"we have a handful of extreme left wing members here who feel that if they get the last word in, that they've won some kind of victory. I call them "mic drop Liberals". They'll deny every fact, every link presented and when someone gives up on them as a lost cause, these "mic drop Liberals" declare victory by default and drop their mic.
They seem to truly believe that if they say something long enough, that it becomes true. Odd, yes, but that's what they do."
What exigency was there to forcibly remove a passenger, under our form of Capitalism, besides the "bottom line"?
I enjoy the practice, just for fun.You claim I'm deranged, so why do you keep caring what I say?
You're ******* deranged.
Because, you are simply being disingenuous.Who said force? Besides you, I mean. You asked "No, the bottom line is not a reason to use force; unless you are in Teapot Dome.Isn't that enough?Nothing but diversion instead of a valid argument, is quite, mundane.Wind.How old are you? 20ish? Because you act like this kid....Apparently the Wind's new strategy is to claim "I already cited that, you missed it'.
That's why I put a post number on mine. Which he's avoiding as inconvenient.
"we have a handful of extreme left wing members here who feel that if they get the last word in, that they've won some kind of victory. I call them "mic drop Liberals". They'll deny every fact, every link presented and when someone gives up on them as a lost cause, these "mic drop Liberals" declare victory by default and drop their mic.
They seem to truly believe that if they say something long enough, that it becomes true. Odd, yes, but that's what they do."
What exigency was there to forcibly remove a passenger, under our form of Capitalism, besides the "bottom line"?
What exigency was there to forcibly remove a passenger" and listed "the bottom line". I agreed.
Four people were removed from the flight for "the bottom line". Only one was removed forcibly and I've repeatedly stated that wasn't a good way to handle it. I've repeatedly stated there were better means resolve the situation. I've repeatedly stated that it wasn't United, Republic or the crew who removed Dao by force, but aviation officers working for the City of Chicago. Do you disagree that I've repeatedly posted those things?
No, it's "the bottom line" to sell every seat available. On some aircraft, there are "jumpseats" that are open and can accommodate a flight attendant or two and all airliners have a cockpit jumpseat for the FAA. When it's not in use by the Feds, then a pilot can ride it to work. In this case, the crew was assigned to fly to SDF.
Disagreed, but fine. Since you feel that way, I'll stop responding to your posts on this thread.Because, you are simply being disingenuous.Who said force? Besides you, I mean. You asked "No, the bottom line is not a reason to use force; unless you are in Teapot Dome.Isn't that enough?Nothing but diversion instead of a valid argument, is quite, mundane.Wind.How old are you? 20ish? Because you act like this kid....
"we have a handful of extreme left wing members here who feel that if they get the last word in, that they've won some kind of victory. I call them "mic drop Liberals". They'll deny every fact, every link presented and when someone gives up on them as a lost cause, these "mic drop Liberals" declare victory by default and drop their mic.
They seem to truly believe that if they say something long enough, that it becomes true. Odd, yes, but that's what they do."
What exigency was there to forcibly remove a passenger, under our form of Capitalism, besides the "bottom line"?
What exigency was there to forcibly remove a passenger" and listed "the bottom line". I agreed.
Four people were removed from the flight for "the bottom line". Only one was removed forcibly and I've repeatedly stated that wasn't a good way to handle it. I've repeatedly stated there were better means resolve the situation. I've repeatedly stated that it wasn't United, Republic or the crew who removed Dao by force, but aviation officers working for the City of Chicago. Do you disagree that I've repeatedly posted those things?
