In present times, is there a difference between a prostitute, pornstar and a normal woman?

[danielpalos]

telling stories is all you know how to do.

Just facts. But I see your prefererence for fallacies instead of discussion is consistent.

you have no facts, only Yourstories not Mystories.

So you are insisting that economic theories aimed at large populations will apply to individuals? And please answer the actual question I asked.

lol. the laws of demand and supply don't cease to exist, for right wing fantasy.

So your answer to my question is ‘Yes’?

it is like gravity. can you as an Individual, escape it?

 

[WinterBorn]

Just facts. But I see your prefererence for fallacies instead of discussion is consistent.

you have no facts, only Yourstories not Mystories.

So you are insisting that economic theories aimed at large populations will apply to individuals? And please answer the actual question I asked.

lol. the laws of demand and supply don't cease to exist, for right wing fantasy.

So your answer to my question is ‘Yes’?

it is like gravity. can you as an Individual, escape it?

Is it impossible to just answer a simple question?

And no, economic principles for entire populations do not apply to individuals.

And your analogy about gravity is ridiculous. Economic principles are not the same as the laws of physics.

 

[danielpalos]

you have no facts, only Yourstories not Mystories.

So you are insisting that economic theories aimed at large populations will apply to individuals? And please answer the actual question I asked.

lol. the laws of demand and supply don't cease to exist, for right wing fantasy.

So your answer to my question is ‘Yes’?

it is like gravity. can you as an Individual, escape it?

Is it impossible to just answer a simple question?

And no, economic principles for entire populations do not apply to individuals.

And your analogy about gravity is ridiculous. Economic principles are not the same as the laws of physics.

demand and supply are economic laws, not right wing fantasy.

 

[WinterBorn]

So you are insisting that economic theories aimed at large populations will apply to individuals? And please answer the actual question I asked.

lol. the laws of demand and supply don't cease to exist, for right wing fantasy.

So your answer to my question is ‘Yes’?

it is like gravity. can you as an Individual, escape it?

Is it impossible to just answer a simple question?

And no, economic principles for entire populations do not apply to individuals.

And your analogy about gravity is ridiculous. Economic principles are not the same as the laws of physics.

demand and supply are economic laws, not right wing fantasy.

Yes they are. And since women control the supply, you have to do what they want in order to get it. You want them to offer it for a free massage.

And still, economic laws are not the same as laws of physics.

 

[danielpalos]

lol. the laws of demand and supply don't cease to exist, for right wing fantasy.

So your answer to my question is ‘Yes’?

it is like gravity. can you as an Individual, escape it?

Is it impossible to just answer a simple question?

And no, economic principles for entire populations do not apply to individuals.

And your analogy about gravity is ridiculous. Economic principles are not the same as the laws of physics.

demand and supply are economic laws, not right wing fantasy.

Yes they are. And since women control the supply, you have to do what they want in order to get it. You want them to offer it for a free massage.

And still, economic laws are not the same as laws of physics.

women want a free really really serious relationship.

 

[WinterBorn]

So your answer to my question is ‘Yes’?

it is like gravity. can you as an Individual, escape it?

Is it impossible to just answer a simple question?

And no, economic principles for entire populations do not apply to individuals.

And your analogy about gravity is ridiculous. Economic principles are not the same as the laws of physics.

demand and supply are economic laws, not right wing fantasy.

Yes they are. And since women control the supply, you have to do what they want in order to get it. You want them to offer it for a free massage.

And still, economic laws are not the same as laws of physics.

women want a free really really serious relationship.

Some do. But they want a serious relationship with someone with whom they are compatible and someone they are attracted to.

Just because a woman wants a relationship doesn't mean any man will do.

Also, I was at a local music event today. I asked 32 women if the fact that a guy didn't have a lot of money meant they wouldn't date him or get in a relationship with him. 28 of them said they would date a guy who didn't have lots of money. 4 of the 28 prefaced that with, "But he has a job, right?".

Their ages ranged from mid 20s to 60 years old or so.

 

[danielpalos]

it is like gravity. can you as an Individual, escape it?

Is it impossible to just answer a simple question?

And no, economic principles for entire populations do not apply to individuals.

And your analogy about gravity is ridiculous. Economic principles are not the same as the laws of physics.

demand and supply are economic laws, not right wing fantasy.

Yes they are. And since women control the supply, you have to do what they want in order to get it. You want them to offer it for a free massage.

And still, economic laws are not the same as laws of physics.

women want a free really really serious relationship.

Some do. But they want a serious relationship with someone with whom they are compatible and someone they are attracted to.

Just because a woman wants a relationship doesn't mean any man will do.

Also, I was at a local music event today. I asked 32 women if the fact that a guy didn't have a lot of money meant they wouldn't date him or get in a relationship with him. 28 of them said they would date a guy who didn't have lots of money. 4 of the 28 prefaced that with, "But he has a job, right?".

Their ages ranged from mid 20s to 60 years old or so.

would that be as much of a factor, if Labor could apply for unemployment compensation, simply for being unemployed?

any guy could get into any hobby, and purchase the tools for that hobby.

in the case of mechanics; what woman would be worse off?

 

[WinterBorn]

Is it impossible to just answer a simple question?

And no, economic principles for entire populations do not apply to individuals.

And your analogy about gravity is ridiculous. Economic principles are not the same as the laws of physics.

demand and supply are economic laws, not right wing fantasy.

Yes they are. And since women control the supply, you have to do what they want in order to get it. You want them to offer it for a free massage.

And still, economic laws are not the same as laws of physics.

women want a free really really serious relationship.

Some do. But they want a serious relationship with someone with whom they are compatible and someone they are attracted to.

Just because a woman wants a relationship doesn't mean any man will do.

Also, I was at a local music event today. I asked 32 women if the fact that a guy didn't have a lot of money meant they wouldn't date him or get in a relationship with him. 28 of them said they would date a guy who didn't have lots of money. 4 of the 28 prefaced that with, "But he has a job, right?".

Their ages ranged from mid 20s to 60 years old or so.

would that be as much of a factor, if Labor could apply for unemployment compensation, simply for being unemployed?

any guy could get into any hobby, and purchase the tools for that hobby.

in the case of mechanics; what woman would be worse off?

I don't foresee rewriting the unemployment laws just so broke guys could get laid.

You are welcome to get into any legal hobby. No one is stopping you from purchasing the tools for your hobby.

In the case of mechanics? I doubt many women would enter in to a serious relationship just to get discount or free mechanic work.

 

[danielpalos]

How can a guy tell the difference; "if a woman is merely a coward for free, when he can buy bravery for a market friendly price?"

 

[danielpalos]

demand and supply are economic laws, not right wing fantasy.

Yes they are. And since women control the supply, you have to do what they want in order to get it. You want them to offer it for a free massage.

And still, economic laws are not the same as laws of physics.

women want a free really really serious relationship.

Some do. But they want a serious relationship with someone with whom they are compatible and someone they are attracted to.

Just because a woman wants a relationship doesn't mean any man will do.

Also, I was at a local music event today. I asked 32 women if the fact that a guy didn't have a lot of money meant they wouldn't date him or get in a relationship with him. 28 of them said they would date a guy who didn't have lots of money. 4 of the 28 prefaced that with, "But he has a job, right?".

Their ages ranged from mid 20s to 60 years old or so.

would that be as much of a factor, if Labor could apply for unemployment compensation, simply for being unemployed?

any guy could get into any hobby, and purchase the tools for that hobby.

in the case of mechanics; what woman would be worse off?

I don't foresee rewriting the unemployment laws just so broke guys could get laid.

You are welcome to get into any legal hobby. No one is stopping you from purchasing the tools for your hobby.

In the case of mechanics? I doubt many women would enter in to a serious relationship just to get discount or free mechanic work.

I doubt many men would enter into a really really serious relationship, for just ****.

 

[WinterBorn]

How can a guy tell the difference; "if a woman is merely a coward for free, when he can buy bravery for a market friendly price?"

What the hell does that even mean?

 

[WinterBorn]

Yes they are. And since women control the supply, you have to do what they want in order to get it. You want them to offer it for a free massage.

And still, economic laws are not the same as laws of physics.

women want a free really really serious relationship.

Some do. But they want a serious relationship with someone with whom they are compatible and someone they are attracted to.

Just because a woman wants a relationship doesn't mean any man will do.

Also, I was at a local music event today. I asked 32 women if the fact that a guy didn't have a lot of money meant they wouldn't date him or get in a relationship with him. 28 of them said they would date a guy who didn't have lots of money. 4 of the 28 prefaced that with, "But he has a job, right?".

Their ages ranged from mid 20s to 60 years old or so.

would that be as much of a factor, if Labor could apply for unemployment compensation, simply for being unemployed?

any guy could get into any hobby, and purchase the tools for that hobby.

in the case of mechanics; what woman would be worse off?

I don't foresee rewriting the unemployment laws just so broke guys could get laid.

You are welcome to get into any legal hobby. No one is stopping you from purchasing the tools for your hobby.

In the case of mechanics? I doubt many women would enter in to a serious relationship just to get discount or free mechanic work.

I doubt many men would enter into a really really serious relationship, for just ****.

So you are finally beginning to see there needs to be attraction in order to begin a serious relationship. And "buying bravery" (whatever the hell that means) is not starting a serious relationship.

 

[danielpalos]

How can a guy tell the difference; "if a woman is merely a coward for free, when he can buy bravery for a market friendly price?"

What the hell does that even mean?

I means even women are as serious as You. They really are, Equal to You.

 

[danielpalos]

women want a free really really serious relationship.

Some do. But they want a serious relationship with someone with whom they are compatible and someone they are attracted to.

Just because a woman wants a relationship doesn't mean any man will do.

Also, I was at a local music event today. I asked 32 women if the fact that a guy didn't have a lot of money meant they wouldn't date him or get in a relationship with him. 28 of them said they would date a guy who didn't have lots of money. 4 of the 28 prefaced that with, "But he has a job, right?".

Their ages ranged from mid 20s to 60 years old or so.

would that be as much of a factor, if Labor could apply for unemployment compensation, simply for being unemployed?

any guy could get into any hobby, and purchase the tools for that hobby.

in the case of mechanics; what woman would be worse off?

I don't foresee rewriting the unemployment laws just so broke guys could get laid.

You are welcome to get into any legal hobby. No one is stopping you from purchasing the tools for your hobby.

In the case of mechanics? I doubt many women would enter in to a serious relationship just to get discount or free mechanic work.

I doubt many men would enter into a really really serious relationship, for just ****.

So you are finally beginning to see there needs to be attraction in order to begin a serious relationship. And "buying bravery" (whatever the hell that means) is not starting a serious relationship.

Neither is playing silly chic, trics.

 

[danielpalos]

I would like to get, really really serious with the next women I meet; but I am not that brave, unless enough of the other ones are doing me. Sorry chics; nothing but, Equality, here.

 

[WinterBorn]

How can a guy tell the difference; "if a woman is merely a coward for free, when he can buy bravery for a market friendly price?"

What the hell does that even mean?

I means even women are as serious as You. They really are, Equal to You.

Of course they are equal. And they, like you, are able to choose who they want to have contact with.

 

[WinterBorn]

I would like to get, really really serious with the next women I meet; but I am not that brave, unless enough of the other ones are doing me. Sorry chics; nothing but, Equality, here.

So you want a serious relationship, but you want to be doing other women too?

And yet, you can’t get laid.

 

[danielpalos]

I would like to get, really really serious with the next women I meet; but I am not that brave, unless enough of the other ones are doing me. Sorry chics; nothing but, Equality, here.

So you want a serious relationship, but you want to be doing other women too?

And yet, you can’t get laid.

not enough equality to go around, with women?

 

[danielpalos]

I would like to get, really really serious with the next women I meet; but I am not that brave, unless enough of the other ones are doing me. Sorry chics; nothing but, Equality, here.

So you want a serious relationship, but you want to be doing other women too?

And yet, you can’t get laid.

I am not the one who has to play, silly games; they are "dead give away".

 

[danielpalos]

I would like to get, really really serious with the next women I meet; but I am not that brave, unless enough of the other ones are doing me. Sorry chics; nothing but, Equality, here.

So you want a serious relationship, but you want to be doing other women too?

And yet, you can’t get laid.

I can always find women who are serious, when I have money.

Why do women complain they can't find anyone serious, when They have money?