Only in your wet dreams, buddy boy.
No, he's right. We see secession movements all over the world. Yugoslavia broke up. Czechoslovakia broke up. Quebec almost seceded but for the ethnic vote. Scotland is trying to secede. The Flemish in Belgium have had enough with supporting the Walloons. Catalonia just tried to secede from the rest of Spain. The Basques have been fighting a long battle. The Kurds want their own homeland. The list goes on.
White people found it manageable to carry blacks when the country was 85% white. It will become unmanageable for whites when they're carrying half the population on their backs. An 85/15 nation is a 5.7:1 nation. When America is less than half white it becomes a 1:1 nation. The financial burdens and the loss of freedom needed to make that work is going to put a lot of pressure on the secession steam kettle.
Look at what is happening at the University of Texas at Austin - the University finds it necessary to pass over highly qualified poor white students in order to admit the mediocre students who come from wealthy black and Hispanic professional families. The University took this right to the Supreme Court.
Our children, the 'mongrels' that people like Nugent talk about, will be just as patriotic as prior generations.
Basing an argument on fantasy is not really a good way to make a convincing case. If you look at Census data on neighborhood segregation you see very stark VOLUNTARY racial segregation boundaries. If you look at mating patterns you see same-race preferences overwhelmingly dominate.
Appealing to the mongrelization of America as a solution means you're appealing to fantasy. The degree of interracial mating that does occur is not likely to change much and so it doesn't have the power to bring about the harmonization you pray it should.
And just as committed to the laws that create a good and just society.
Bullshit. If this was the case then after 9/11 we should have seen a flood of Muslim-Americans signing up to go fight Muslims in Afghanistan to avenge what happened to America and to clearly demonstrate their loyalty to America. The textbook example of this is the Japanese-American staffed
442 Infantry Regiment in WWII:
The 442nd Regimental Combat Team of the United States Army was a regimental size fighting unit composed almost entirely of American soldiers of Japanese ancestry who fought in World War II, despite the fact that many of their families were subject to internment. Beginning in 1944, the regiment fought primarily in Europe during World War II,[2] in particular Italy, southern France, and Germany. The 442nd is "the most decorated unit in U.S. military history."[3] It was awarded eight Presidential Unit Citations and twenty-one of its members were awarded the Medal of Honor for World War II.[4] Its motto was "Go for Broke".
Actions like that do wonders to bind people deep into the American fabric. What happened with the Muslims? They didn't want to fight fellow Muslims.
We see the same dynamic with Hispanic-Americans. They care more about Hispanic illegal infiltrators than they do about their fellow American citizens.
Look at black and Hispanic voting patterns. When America was mostly white, white voters split evenly between Republicans and Democrats and their racial identity was immaterial. Whites voted based on public policy interests. Blacks voted for Obama because he was black and because Democrats give special favors to blacks for being black. Hispanics also vote for Democrats because of gimmes. This indicates that racial identity is a stronger group identity than national identity or political identity. Exactly the opposite of what we see amongst white Americans.
White Americans lived their lives to create a just society. Minorities are living their lives in a racially defined cultural ghetto, the exact opposite of what you claim.
When a Hispanic-American shows greater concern for Mexican illegal infiltrators than he does for his fellow American citizens, then my bond of citizenship with this person is fractured. He's shown his loyalty to foreigners and so I'm not inclined to feel any bond towards him.
The rest of the time it has been at the ballot box, and that is where it will continue to be.
As we see all around the world, the mix of Democracy, Free Market Economics and Multiculturalism is explosive in the extreme and in massively unstable. One, or more of the pillars, must always be sacrificed.
In a Free Market economy there are always winners and losers. With the introduction of multiculturalism we invariably see a racial overlay to the winners and losers. This adds a huge complication to the winners-loser dynamic, especially when you're in the loser group and you see "the others" in the winner group. If the groups are not equal in size, and they rarely are, then we see the losers using the power of the vote to take income and assets away from the winners, one racial group using the power of the ballot box to target another racial group.
Anyone who believes that the targeted racial group just accepts being raked over the coals is likely a moron. This is where the revolutions always begin.
