What is your position? Do you subscribe the the Austrian school of Ludwig Von Mises, Murray Rothbard and Hans Hermann Hoppe, or do you follow the Keynesian theory of Greenspan, Bernanke, Geithner and Paulson?
If you don't know, then list yourself as undecided and allow proponents for the two schools to try to win you to their side by the strength of their arguments.
Your dichotomy is a lot like the strawman dichotomy of either socialism and commyism or full frontal capitalism.
While in reality there has never been any such thing as communism or capitalism, and Keynesian economics is the preferred choice of the right wing, even tho they ignorantly deny it, the right is a Keynesian stronghold.
The right just doesn't realize that monetarism, Milton Friedman and the Chicago school all rely extremely heavily on Keynes' basic premises.
But the real fatal sin in your presentation is that you assume that A) either side of your dichotomy is correct (and neither are) or B) that it is either one or the other (it is both and neither).
But that is what happens when you erect strawmen around a subject that you neither understand or around a dichotomy that is pure fantasy.
Earth to idiot: Keynes and Moses are just theorists, their ideas are just theories, as such they are neither right or wrong and theirs are certainly not the only theories.
Economics is a simplistic, convoluted study of mythical constructs and states. The economy is a complex, dynamic system of actual real world events and circumstances. Simplistic theories can not possibly corral the real economy into a box where it can be treated like a mere equation or maxim set.
The economy is like earthquakes, no amount of psuedo-science will ever be able to explain, predict or account for them except in hindsight.
