In an unusual display of bipartisan consensus, Dem and Repub judges agree.

[berg80]

In rare interviews, federal judges criticize Supreme Court's handling of Trump cases​

WASHINGTON — Federal judges are frustrated with the Supreme Court for increasingly overturning lower court rulings involving the Trump administration with little or no explanation, with some worried the practice is undermining the judiciary at a sensitive time.

Some judges believe the Supreme Court, and in particular Chief Justice John Roberts, could be doing more to defend the integrity of their work as President Donald Trump and his allies harshly criticize those who rule against him and as violent threats against judges are on the rise.

In rare interviews with NBC News, a dozen federal judges — appointed by Democratic and Republican presidents, including Trump, and serving around the country — pointed to a pattern they say has recently emerged:
Lower court judges are handed contentious cases involving the Trump administration. They painstakingly research the law to reach their rulings. When they go against Trump, administration officials and allies criticize the judges in harsh terms. The government appeals to the Supreme Court, with its 6-3 conservative majority.

And then the Supreme Court, in emergency rulings, swiftly rejects the judges’ decisions with little to no explanation.

Emergency rulings used to be rare. But their number has dramatically increased in recent years.

In rare interviews, federal judges criticize Supreme Court's handling of Trump cases

Ten judges tell NBC News the Supreme Court needs to explain its rulings better, with some urging Chief Justice John Roberts to do more to defend the judiciary against external criticism.

www.nbcnews.com

I know, I know, those Repub judges criticizing Don are being disloyal. Or they aren't "real" Repubs and somehow slipped past the notice of those who told trump to nominate them.

Keep in mind this is not necessarily a rejection of the rulings as much as it is an expression of concern with the lack of an explanation for them.

Ten of the 12 judges who spoke to NBC News said the Supreme Court should better explain those rulings, noting that the terse decisions leave lower court judges with little guidance for how to proceed. But they also have a new and concerning effect, the judges said, validating the Trump administration’s criticisms. A short rebuttal from the Supreme Court, they argue, makes it seem like they did shoddy work and are biased against Trump.

 

[kyzr]

another berg TDS thread

not on fixing democrat policies. That's why dems are toxic at 19%

 

[berg80]

another berg TDS thread

I used to think to myself when I saw you repeat the vapid TDS claim that surely you could do better. Now I know that's not so.

 

[kyzr]

I used to think to myself when I saw you repeat the vapid TDS claim that surely you could do better. Now I know that's not so.

You put up a lot of threads every day whining about TDS issues, instead of explaining why democrat policies are better than Trump policies.

 

[elektra]

The headline is;

Inferior court judges whine, cry, and rant, "we should have power over the Supreme Court and Pesident of the USA"

 

[berg80]

You put up a lot of threads every day whining about TDS issues, instead of explaining why democrat policies are better than Trump policies.

You don't spend a lot of time addressing observations about trump's idiocy, authoritarian impulses, corruption, and illegal acts. Rather, you ignore them. I suppose because you aren't capable of defending them.

 

[struth]

In rare interviews, federal judges criticize Supreme Court's handling of Trump cases​

WASHINGTON — Federal judges are frustrated with the Supreme Court for increasingly overturning lower court rulings involving the Trump administration with little or no explanation, with some worried the practice is undermining the judiciary at a sensitive time.

Some judges believe the Supreme Court, and in particular Chief Justice John Roberts, could be doing more to defend the integrity of their work as President Donald Trump and his allies harshly criticize those who rule against him and as violent threats against judges are on the rise.

In rare interviews with NBC News, a dozen federal judges — appointed by Democratic and Republican presidents, including Trump, and serving around the country — pointed to a pattern they say has recently emerged:
Lower court judges are handed contentious cases involving the Trump administration. They painstakingly research the law to reach their rulings. When they go against Trump, administration officials and allies criticize the judges in harsh terms. The government appeals to the Supreme Court, with its 6-3 conservative majority.

And then the Supreme Court, in emergency rulings, swiftly rejects the judges’ decisions with little to no explanation.

Emergency rulings used to be rare. But their number has dramatically increased in recent years.

In rare interviews, federal judges criticize Supreme Court's handling of Trump cases

Ten judges tell NBC News the Supreme Court needs to explain its rulings better, with some urging Chief Justice John Roberts to do more to defend the judiciary against external criticism.

www.nbcnews.com

I know, I know, those Repub judges criticizing Don are being disloyal. Or they aren't "real" Repubs and somehow slipped past the notice of those who told trump to nominate them.

Keep in mind this is not necessarily a rejection of the rulings as much as it is an expression of concern with the lack of an explanation for them.

Ten of the 12 judges who spoke to NBC News said the Supreme Court should better explain those rulings, noting that the terse decisions leave lower court judges with little guidance for how to proceed. But they also have a new and concerning effect, the judges said, validating the Trump administration’s criticisms. A short rebuttal from the Supreme Court, they argue, makes it seem like they did shoddy work and are biased against Trump.

So a dozen judges are whining that they are getting their rulings wrong and ***** slapped....wow...this is newsworthy?

Speaking of getting ***** slapped, an Appeals Court, not the SCOTUS, just ***** slapped another radical leftist judge's ruling and is allowing the admin to continue to deport and detent illegals

Appeals court rules "Alligator Alcatraz" site can stay open​

MSN