shockedcanadian
Diamond Member
- Aug 6, 2012
- 32,082
- 29,464
- 2,905
First, I want to state, neither candidate was impressive. Trump did better on calling out the scandals, and many watching probably googled them since their indoctrination media of choice never brings it up. However, he failed to focus on the key areas of strength: jobs, the economy and China. Those are his key to victory and he didn't raise them near enough.
Second, Wallace is a tool. If this is supposed to be the "conservative" choice for debates, I'll take my chances that CNN is more fair and open to letting them battle it out. Whatever media are doing the 2nd and 3rd have a great opportunity to cut into Fox ratings, by simply being more neutral and letting them debate. They may pick up some Wallace viewers.
Why wouldn't you consider your three top rated shows in the country to have a moderator? Why capitulate for "fairness"? You think CNN would send out a right leaning moderator? Laura Ingraham would have been a perfect choice, why weak, flimsy, China First Wallace? Oh, maybe I answered my own question...
Why was Wallace bailing out Biden in particular? Let them duke it out ffs, you have 90+ minutes. By my math, 20 seconds to ask a question, 2 min each to respond, 4 minutes of debate. You eat up 8 min 20 sec per question.
You can ask 10 questions with time left for more slugging. Let them debate ffs, the interjecting made it far worse. If a man can't stand on the stage and defend himself and his policies, he shouldn't be running for president. This isn't the time for pablum.
Without question, Wallace made it worse. You shouldn't be "reffing". You should say, "ok, time's up". Trump and Biden can demand answers from the other. Trump certainly did.
Second, Wallace is a tool. If this is supposed to be the "conservative" choice for debates, I'll take my chances that CNN is more fair and open to letting them battle it out. Whatever media are doing the 2nd and 3rd have a great opportunity to cut into Fox ratings, by simply being more neutral and letting them debate. They may pick up some Wallace viewers.
Why wouldn't you consider your three top rated shows in the country to have a moderator? Why capitulate for "fairness"? You think CNN would send out a right leaning moderator? Laura Ingraham would have been a perfect choice, why weak, flimsy, China First Wallace? Oh, maybe I answered my own question...
Why was Wallace bailing out Biden in particular? Let them duke it out ffs, you have 90+ minutes. By my math, 20 seconds to ask a question, 2 min each to respond, 4 minutes of debate. You eat up 8 min 20 sec per question.
You can ask 10 questions with time left for more slugging. Let them debate ffs, the interjecting made it far worse. If a man can't stand on the stage and defend himself and his policies, he shouldn't be running for president. This isn't the time for pablum.
Without question, Wallace made it worse. You shouldn't be "reffing". You should say, "ok, time's up". Trump and Biden can demand answers from the other. Trump certainly did.