In 2024 Minnesota AG Keith Ellison Argued No Right to Carry a Gun at ‘Political Rallies and Protests’

[postman]

Well, if they said it, they are wrong. If you are licensed to carry, you can go anywhere that doesn’t prohibit them (eg security line at the airport).

Again, Right or Left, if you are carrying and proactively obstructing, confronting, or threatening law enforcement at any level, odds increase you will be shot.

I know they're wrong. You know they're wrong. The decision in DC v Heller, says they're wrong.

But the MAGA's are still supporting Trump 100%

 

[otto105]

Well, if they said it, they are wrong. If you are licensed to carry, you can go anywhere that doesn’t prohibit them (eg security line at the airport).

Again, Right or Left, if you are carrying and proactively obstructing, confronting, or threatening law enforcement at any level, odds increase you will be shot.

He was video recording the officers who caused the interaction.

Stop lying wanker.

 

[Lockback]

I know they're wrong. You know they're wrong. The decision in DC v Heller, says they're wrong.

But the MAGA's are still supporting Trump 100%

You just keep lying and lying and lying and lying, don't you?

 

[martybegan]

Since Trump, Bondi and Patel all agree.
They can issue warrants, get indictments, and prosecute according to that position.
They can weaponize the FBI and DOJ to disarm protesters.

There is a lot of "Can" and not a whole lot of "will do" in that.

Much like there is a whole lot of horseshit in your posts, and not much actual content.

 

[martybegan]

As I said, the Jews in NAZI Germany probably made the same argument.

Again with the Godwin idiocy.

 

[postman]

There is a lot of "Can" and not a whole lot of "will do" in that.

Remember FAFO

 

[martybegan]

Remember FAFO

Still not seeing it happening.

But keep jerking yourself off to these supposed "gotcha" moments like the good wibble lefty lemming you are.

 

[postman]

Again with the Godwin idiocy.

Again with the hypocrisy.

Back when republicans were in support of the 2nd amendment.
That was the first thing they would post to support it.
And why they feared the government coming after their guns,
and their right to carry them.

 

[martybegan]

Back when republicans were in support of the 2nd amendment.
That was the first thing they would post to support it.
And why they feared the government coming after their guns,
and their right to carry them.

We still are.
We still do
We still do, when Democrats are in power. And they have a proven track record of being gun grabbers.
We still want it.

What we don't want to do is interfere with law enforcement doing their legal duties.

 

[tyroneweaver]

Trump, Patel and Noem seem to agree strongly.
**** them.
Being a 2A absolutist I, of course, disagree. Until someone commits an assaultive act involving a firearm, carrying, open or concealed, is not subject to the state, it’s officials, or it’s agents.

He has to have ID. He didn't
You can't commit a crime. He committed a crime when he didn't follow direction from a federal officer

 

[tyroneweaver]

There is only 1 cult.

ya The Southern Poverty Law Center

 

[postman]

What we don't want to do is interfere with law enforcement doing their legal duties.

Yet that's what you did on January 6th, by the thousands.

 

[LeftofLeft]

I know they're wrong. You know they're wrong. The decision in DC v Heller, says they're wrong.

But the MAGA's are still supporting Trump 100%

Go figure. You can support a candidate overall and disagree with some of their positions.

 

[LeftofLeft]

He was video recording the officers who caused the interaction.

Stop lying wanker.

Prove I’m lying.

 

[postman]

He has to have ID. He didn't
You can't commit a crime. He committed a crime when he didn't follow direction from a federal officer

Are the same people who told you he didn't have ID
The ones who said he was planning a massive assault upon federal officers.
That he was brandishing his weapon.
And that he had a gun when they shot him

 

[otto105]

Prove I’m lying.

Watch the video.

For once be honest.

 

[postman]

Go figure. You can support a candidate overall and disagree with some of their positions.

If they thought Trump was wrong on this, they would be supporting Pretti's 2nd amendment rights.,

Yet all of their arguments are that Pretti wasn't within his constitutional rights.

 

[martybegan]

Yet that's what you did on January 6th, by the thousands.

One day, in one location. and if Biden's DOJ didn't decide to make political examples, there would have been no reason for pardons.

Meanwhile months of this crap all over the country.

 

[martybegan]

If they thought Trump was wrong on this, they would be supporting Pretti's 2nd amendment rights.,

Yet all of their arguments are that Pretti wasn't within his constitutional rights.

He could carry, what he couldn't do was engage with law enforcement performing their legal duties.

 

[otto105]

He could carry, what he couldn't do was engage with law enforcement performing their legal duties.

Hilarious

By recording the ice fuckups.