In 2022, RFK Jr. Tried to Reason with Liberals About Their Response to COVID-19

[mikegriffith1]

In 2022, in a short book titled A Letter to Liberals: Censorship and COVID: An Attack on Science and American Ideals, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tried to reason with liberals about their draconian, irrational, and unscientific response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The publisher's description says that Kennedy "invites readers to look at the data in order to answer questions such as":

• Did COVID vaccines really save millions and end the pandemic?
• Why were the lowest COVID death rates in countries and states that relied on therapeutic drugs, and in countries with the lowest vaccination rates?
• Did vaccines prevent infection or transmission as officials promised?
• Why do COVID vaccines appear to show “negative efficacy”—making the vaccinated more susceptible to COVID.
• Why does the most reliable data suggest that COVID vaccines do not lower the risk of death and hospitalization.
• Should government technocrats be partnering with media and social media titans to censor and suppress the questioning of government policies?
• And why have so many liberals abandoned fundamental Constitutional principles in their headlong rush to embrace pandemic policies pushed by captured bureaucrats, feckless politicians, a compromised news media, and Big Pharma?

In his November 2021 book The Real Anthony Fauci, which sold over 1,000,000 copies, Kennedy made predictions that have matured from “conspiracy theories” to established facts. Among these are the following:

• Masks are ineffective and can be dangerous
• Social distancing was not science-based
• School closures were not science-based
• Lockdowns were counterproductive
• Vaccinating children against COVID-19 causes more harm and death than it averts
• Officials wrongly used PCR tests to justify the countermeasures
• Covid-19 may have come from a Wuhan lab
• Natural immunity is superior to vaccine immunity

If we have another pandemic within the next five years, RFK Jr. is the man I want in the White House to deal with it.

Sources for further reading:

Are Lockdowns Effective in Managing Pandemics? (linked with abstract on the NIH website, published August 2022)
EXCERPT: The present coronavirus crisis caused a major worldwide disruption which has not been experienced for decades. The lockdown-based crisis management was implemented by nearly all the countries, and studies confirming lockdown effectiveness can be found alongside the studies questioning it. In this work, we performed a narrative review of the works studying the above effectiveness, as well as the historic experience of previous pandemics and risk-benefit analysis based on the connection of health and wealth. Our aim was to learn lessons and analyze ways to improve the management of similar events in the future. The comparative analysis of different countries showed that the assumption of lockdowns’ effectiveness cannot be supported by evidence—neither regarding the present COVID-19 pandemic, nor regarding the 1918–1920 Spanish Flu and other less-severe pandemics in the past. The price tag of lockdowns in terms of public health is high: by using the known connection between health and wealth, we estimate that lockdowns may claim 20 times more life years than they save.

The Great Barrington Declaration

FAQs about The Great Barrington Declaration

Johns Hopkins Study Debunks Myth of Need for Covid Lockdowns

New Study Proves COVID Lockdowns Did Not Work

Lockdowns Were Worse Than Useless

The Man Who Talked Back

Did Lockdowns Work?

COVID-19 Lockdowns in Africa Have Been Deadlier than the Disease

Focused Protection

 

[Dante]

Poor Bobby -- worms eating away at his brain.

 

[Oddball]

Reason doesn't work on people who react out of emotion.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

 

[mikegriffith1]

Poor Bobby -- worms eating away at his brain.

An unserious, uninformed response.

You might read Senator Rand Paul's book Deception: The Great Covid Cover-Up (Regnery Publishing, 2023). From the publisher's description of the book:

One of the few leaders who dared to challenge "America’s Doctor" was Senator Rand Paul, himself a physician. Deception is his indictment of the catastrophic failures of the public health bureaucracy during the pandemic.

Senator Paul presents the evidence that:

• The Covid virus was likely the product of gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab in China—research funded in part by the U.S. government.
• Taxpayer dollars for that research were deceptively funneled to Wuhan without the required regulatory review.
• Fauci and his scientific yes-men knew from day one about Covid’s origin and tried to cover it up.
• Fauci and his allies ruthlessly attacked everyone—including highly qualified scientists—who threatened to reveal the truth about the pandemic.

Why? Hundreds of millions of dollars of grants and unreported royalties were at stake, and heads would roll if the truth got out.

It almost worked. At Fauci’s insistence, the government imposed needlessly extreme lockdowns on Americans at the cost of immense personal and economic destruction.

Covid-19 was deadly, but the real killer was the coverup, led by America’s most durable medical bureaucrat—a man for whom the truth was too often expendable.

Senator Paul makes a powerful case that funding dangerous bioengineering in a totalitarian country is madness. If we don’t heed this warning, the next pandemic could be far worse.

 

[candycorn]

Did COVID vaccines really save millions and end the pandemic?

yes.

 

[Dante]

An unserious, uninformed response.

You might read Senator Rand Paul's book Deception: The Great Covid Cover-Up (Regnery Publishing, 2023). From the publisher's description of the book:

One of the few leaders who dared to challenge "America’s Doctor" was Senator Rand Paul, himself a physician. Deception is his indictment of the catastrophic failures of the public health bureaucracy during the pandemic.

Senator Paul presents the evidence that:

• The Covid virus was likely the product of gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab in China—research funded in part by the U.S. government.
• Taxpayer dollars for that research were deceptively funneled to Wuhan without the required regulatory review.
• Fauci and his scientific yes-men knew from day one about Covid’s origin and tried to cover it up.
• Fauci and his allies ruthlessly attacked everyone—including highly qualified scientists—who threatened to reveal the truth about the pandemic.

Why? Hundreds of millions of dollars of grants and unreported royalties were at stake, and heads would roll if the truth got out.

It almost worked. At Fauci’s insistence, the government imposed needlessly extreme lockdowns on Americans at the cost of immense personal and economic destruction.

Covid-19 was deadly, but the real killer was the coverup, led by America’s most durable medical bureaucrat—a man for whom the truth was too often expendable.

Senator Paul makes a powerful case that funding dangerous bioengineering in a totalitarian country is madness. If we don’t heed this warning, the next pandemic could be far worse.

Bobby's confession about worms eating his brain reminds me of Romney's dad.

 

[Oddball]

An unserious, uninformed response.

You might read Senator Rand Paul's book Deception: The Great Covid Cover-Up (Regnery Publishing, 2023). From the publisher's description of the book:

One of the few leaders who dared to challenge "America’s Doctor" was Senator Rand Paul, himself a physician. Deception is his indictment of the catastrophic failures of the public health bureaucracy during the pandemic.

Senator Paul presents the evidence that:

• The Covid virus was likely the product of gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab in China—research funded in part by the U.S. government.
• Taxpayer dollars for that research were deceptively funneled to Wuhan without the required regulatory review.
• Fauci and his scientific yes-men knew from day one about Covid’s origin and tried to cover it up.
• Fauci and his allies ruthlessly attacked everyone—including highly qualified scientists—who threatened to reveal the truth about the pandemic.

Why? Hundreds of millions of dollars of grants and unreported royalties were at stake, and heads would roll if the truth got out.

It almost worked. At Fauci’s insistence, the government imposed needlessly extreme lockdowns on Americans at the cost of immense personal and economic destruction.

Covid-19 was deadly, but the real killer was the coverup, led by America’s most durable medical bureaucrat—a man for whom the truth was too often expendable.

Senator Paul makes a powerful case that funding dangerous bioengineering in a totalitarian country is madness. If we don’t heed this warning, the next pandemic could be far worse.

Dainty is nothing, if not unserious and uninformed.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

In 2022, in a short book titled A Letter to Liberals: Censorship and COVID: An Attack on Science and American Ideals, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tried to reason with liberals about their draconian, irrational, and unscientific response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The publisher's description says that Kennedy "invites readers to look at the data in order to answer questions such as":

• Did COVID vaccines really save millions and end the pandemic?
• Why were the lowest COVID death rates in countries and states that relied on therapeutic drugs, and in countries with the lowest vaccination rates?
• Did vaccines prevent infection or transmission as officials promised?
• Why do COVID vaccines appear to show “negative efficacy”—making the vaccinated more susceptible to COVID.
• Why does the most reliable data suggest that COVID vaccines do not lower the risk of death and hospitalization.
• Should government technocrats be partnering with media and social media titans to censor and suppress the questioning of government policies?
• And why have so many liberals abandoned fundamental Constitutional principles in their headlong rush to embrace pandemic policies pushed by captured bureaucrats, feckless politicians, a compromised news media, and Big Pharma?

In his November 2021 book The Real Anthony Fauci, which sold over 1,000,000 copies, Kennedy made predictions that have matured from “conspiracy theories” to established facts. Among these are the following:

• Masks are ineffective and can be dangerous
• Social distancing was not science-based
• School closures were not science-based
• Lockdowns were counterproductive
• Vaccinating children against COVID-19 causes more harm and death than it averts
• Officials wrongly used PCR tests to justify the countermeasures
• Covid-19 may have come from a Wuhan lab
• Natural immunity is superior to vaccine immunity

If we have another pandemic within the next five years, RFK Jr. is the man I want in the White House to deal with it.

Sources for further reading:

Are Lockdowns Effective in Managing Pandemics? (linked with abstract on the NIH website, published August 2022)
EXCERPT: The present coronavirus crisis caused a major worldwide disruption which has not been experienced for decades. The lockdown-based crisis management was implemented by nearly all the countries, and studies confirming lockdown effectiveness can be found alongside the studies questioning it. In this work, we performed a narrative review of the works studying the above effectiveness, as well as the historic experience of previous pandemics and risk-benefit analysis based on the connection of health and wealth. Our aim was to learn lessons and analyze ways to improve the management of similar events in the future. The comparative analysis of different countries showed that the assumption of lockdowns’ effectiveness cannot be supported by evidence—neither regarding the present COVID-19 pandemic, nor regarding the 1918–1920 Spanish Flu and other less-severe pandemics in the past. The price tag of lockdowns in terms of public health is high: by using the known connection between health and wealth, we estimate that lockdowns may claim 20 times more life years than they save.

The Great Barrington Declaration

FAQs about The Great Barrington Declaration

Johns Hopkins Study Debunks Myth of Need for Covid Lockdowns

New Study Proves COVID Lockdowns Did Not Work

Lockdowns Were Worse Than Useless

The Man Who Talked Back

Did Lockdowns Work?

COVID-19 Lockdowns in Africa Have Been Deadlier than the Disease

Focused Protection

So what? He is a goddamn moron.

 

[Independent thinker]

In 2022, in a short book titled A Letter to Liberals: Censorship and COVID: An Attack on Science and American Ideals, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tried to reason with liberals about their draconian, irrational, and unscientific response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The publisher's description says that Kennedy "invites readers to look at the data in order to answer questions such as":

• Did COVID vaccines really save millions and end the pandemic?
• Why were the lowest COVID death rates in countries and states that relied on therapeutic drugs, and in countries with the lowest vaccination rates?
• Did vaccines prevent infection or transmission as officials promised?
• Why do COVID vaccines appear to show “negative efficacy”—making the vaccinated more susceptible to COVID.
• Why does the most reliable data suggest that COVID vaccines do not lower the risk of death and hospitalization.
• Should government technocrats be partnering with media and social media titans to censor and suppress the questioning of government policies?
• And why have so many liberals abandoned fundamental Constitutional principles in their headlong rush to embrace pandemic policies pushed by captured bureaucrats, feckless politicians, a compromised news media, and Big Pharma?

In his November 2021 book The Real Anthony Fauci, which sold over 1,000,000 copies, Kennedy made predictions that have matured from “conspiracy theories” to established facts. Among these are the following:

• Masks are ineffective and can be dangerous
• Social distancing was not science-based
• School closures were not science-based
• Lockdowns were counterproductive
• Vaccinating children against COVID-19 causes more harm and death than it averts
• Officials wrongly used PCR tests to justify the countermeasures
• Covid-19 may have come from a Wuhan lab
• Natural immunity is superior to vaccine immunity

If we have another pandemic within the next five years, RFK Jr. is the man I want in the White House to deal with it.

Sources for further reading:

Are Lockdowns Effective in Managing Pandemics? (linked with abstract on the NIH website, published August 2022)
EXCERPT: The present coronavirus crisis caused a major worldwide disruption which has not been experienced for decades. The lockdown-based crisis management was implemented by nearly all the countries, and studies confirming lockdown effectiveness can be found alongside the studies questioning it. In this work, we performed a narrative review of the works studying the above effectiveness, as well as the historic experience of previous pandemics and risk-benefit analysis based on the connection of health and wealth. Our aim was to learn lessons and analyze ways to improve the management of similar events in the future. The comparative analysis of different countries showed that the assumption of lockdowns’ effectiveness cannot be supported by evidence—neither regarding the present COVID-19 pandemic, nor regarding the 1918–1920 Spanish Flu and other less-severe pandemics in the past. The price tag of lockdowns in terms of public health is high: by using the known connection between health and wealth, we estimate that lockdowns may claim 20 times more life years than they save.

The Great Barrington Declaration

FAQs about The Great Barrington Declaration

Johns Hopkins Study Debunks Myth of Need for Covid Lockdowns

New Study Proves COVID Lockdowns Did Not Work

Lockdowns Were Worse Than Useless

The Man Who Talked Back

Did Lockdowns Work?

COVID-19 Lockdowns in Africa Have Been Deadlier than the Disease

Focused Protection

What socialists do is to try and find reasons to institute Marshall law and take democracy away, which is what they did during the pandemic.