IN 2020, the CIA lied to the US Senate, saying that the Hunter Biden laptop story was "Russian disinformation"

[Marener]

That was after all the denials by Ole’ Stumblebum that he had no knowledge and no involvement with Hunter’s business partners.

Shaking someone’s hand and saying hi isn’t getting involved in Hunter’s business.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Shaking someone’s hand and saying hi isn’t getting involved in Hunter’s business.

Then why did he LIE about any knowledge or involvement?
You pathetic Marxist lying scumbags are moving the goalposts as usual.

 

[rightwinger]

That was after all the denials by Ole’ Stumblebum that he had no knowledge and no involvement with Hunter’s business partners.

But wait a minute…

You guys are the one claiming Biden is influence peddling.
You know, providing official services for pay

Now you are saying he met someone?

 

[rightwinger]

Then why did he LIE about any knowledge or involvement?
You pathetic Marxist lying scumbags are moving the goalposts as usual.

Maybe because Hunters business partners said he had no involvement

 

[SeaMajor7]

Maybe because Hunters business partners said he had no involvement

Oh, that settles everything.

 

[rightwinger]

Oh, that settles everything.

Actually, it does

 

[Care4all]

10% for the big guy.

Which was in an email written by Hunter associates, after Joe Biden was no longer in office, after he was no longer vp., when he was a free man to do business with whom he wanted.

AND which there is no evidence or proof, Joe Biden ever got....that alleged deal, never happened.

you're letting yourself get fooled, over nothing....

 

[konradv]

The CIA knew this was false, but they lied to the US Senate and the American people to help Joe Biden get elected.

This is what actual insurrection looks like.



The highest officials within the CIA were aware of the statement prior to its publication. CIA’s Chief Operating Officer (COO) Andrew Makridis testified that he informed Director Gina Haspel or Deputy Director Vaughn Frederick Bishop about its impending release. This sequence of events suggests that senior CIA leadership had ample opportunity to assess the validity of the statement's claims. Furthermore, the COO’s office appeared to signal approval of the statement in a move that departed from standard Prepublication Classification Review Board (PCRB) protocols.

Additionally, some of the statement's signatories were on active contract with the CIA at the time they issued the statement to discredit damaging allegations about Biden family influence peddling. Despite claiming they lacked access to classified information at the time, at least two signatories—Michael Morell and former CIA Inspector General David Buckley—were actively working for the CIA as contractors. This revelation raises concerns that these officials may have abused their positions to expedite the statement's approval and may have been earning taxpayer dollars while they did it.

Furthermore, officials within the CIA recognized at the time that the Hunter Biden statement was political and would hurt the Agency. The signatories’ decision to leverage their former intelligence community titles to promote a narrative about foreign election interference improperly embroiled the Agency in domestic politics. This report underscores the potential dangers of a politicized intelligence community.

That still doesn’t exonerate Trump of his many felonies.

#LOCKHIMUP

 

[jknowgood]

Which was in an email written by Hunter associates, after Joe Biden was no longer in office, after he was no longer vp., when he was a free man to do business with whom he wanted.

AND which there is no evidence or proof, Joe Biden ever got....that alleged deal, never happened.

you're letting yourself get fooled, over nothing....

You people do nothing but lie. In the beginning this was all Russian disinformation. You cannot be trusted.

 

[Billiejeens]

Are you saying there's a difference between them?

.

Good point.
But, on this issue there seems to be.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Actually, it does

No, it doesn't. You are FLAILING.
Joe LIED about any knowledge or involvement with Hunter's ridiculous business relationships in foreign countries.
The ONLY reason Hunter had those relationships was the connection to his father.
All you are doing is moving the goalposts AS USUAL.
GTFOH!!!!!

 

[Billiejeens]

They are paid DNCCCP stooges. That's why they have no problem posting lies.

They are inept
Who would pay them?

 

[rightwinger]

No, it doesn't. You are FLAILING.
Joe LIED about any knowledge or involvement with Hunter's ridiculous business relationships in foreign countries.
The ONLY reason Hunter had those relationships was the connection to his father.
All you are doing is moving the goalposts AS USUAL.
GTFOH!!!!!

What ever happened to your claims that Biden was influence peddling?
You know…accepting cash for official services
You know….things that are actually illegal

Handshakes with Hunters business partners doesn’t cut it
Especially when they all claim they never talked business with the VP

 

[SeaMajor7]

What ever happened to your claims that Biden was influence peddling?
You know…accepting cash for official services
You know….things that are actually illegal

Handshakes with Hunters business partners doesn’t cut it
Especially when they all claim they never talked business with the VP

 

[Care4all]

Then why did he LIE about any knowledge or involvement?
You pathetic Marxist lying scumbags are moving the goalposts as usual.

Good morning!

They were accusing Joe of quid pro quo, with people Hunter was in business with.... While Biden was in office. Joe's answer pertains to that...he was not in business with his son, nor in cohoots with ANY of Hunter's business partners, to receive money from these foreign companies, to give the foreign companies something in our govt, in return. Quid Pro Quo. There was no Quid Pro Joe!

It didn't happen, It is a Russian, yes Russian....fabricated lie that began 2 years earlier, after Trump's impeachment for his quid pro quo attempt with Zelensky when Giuliani was sent by Trump to the Ukraine.

Joe answered correctly, he was not involved with Hunter's foreign business partners in any deal, he did not use his vp power to help any of Hunter's business partners, he did not give them anything in return either.

It's a right wing conspiracy of nothingness, that has no legs....to stand on.

Now, was Hunter using his last name to wheel and deal, deals for himself and partners, you betcha he was....! Imo!

But that has nothing to do with Joe being involved in Hunter's business.... That has to do with Hunter, and his own low life-ness!

 

[SeaMajor7]

Good morning!

They were accusing Joe of quid pro quo, with people Hunter was in business with.... While Biden was in office. Joe's answer pertains to that...he was not in business with his son, nor in cohoots with ANY of Hunter's business partners, to receive money from these foreign companies, to give the foreign companies something in our govt, in return. Quid Pro Quo. There was no Quid Pro Joe!

It didn't happen, It is a Russian, yes Russian....fabricated lie that began 2 years earlier, after Trump's impeachment for his quid pro quo attempt with Zelensky when Giuliani was sent by Trump to the Ukraine.

Joe answered correctly, he was not involved with Hunter's foreign business partners in any deal, he did not use his vp power to help any of Hunter's business partners, he did not give them anything in return either.

It's a right wing conspiracy of nothingness, that has no legs....to stand on.

Now, was Hunter using his last name to wheel and deal, deals for himself and partners, you betcha he was....! Imo!

But that has nothing to do with Joe being involved in Hunter's business.... That has to do with Hunter, and his own low life-ness!

Morning princess.
Thank you for the recap of The Narrative.
I'm disappointed that you believe that nonsense.
And, son of a female dog, they fired him.

 

[Marener]

You people do nothing but lie. In the beginning this was all Russian disinformation. You cannot be trusted.

The OP story is unconnected to the laptop. We know that Russians were pushing disinformation about Joe Biden being bribed by Burisma. That is what the briefing was about. Not about the laptop.

 

[Billiejeens]

Morning princess.
Thank you for the recap of The Narrative.
I'm disappointed that you believe that nonsense.
And, son of a female dog, they fired him.

That one is so deep down the rabbit hole of her echo chamber, that there is no hope.

 

[Billiejeens]

The OP story is unconnected to the laptop. We know that Russians were pushing disinformation about Joe Biden being bribed by Burisma. That is what the briefing was about. Not about the laptop.

Wow

The shit that you people will say.

 

[Independent thinker]

The CIA knew this was false, but they lied to the US Senate and the American people to help Joe Biden get elected.

This is what actual insurrection looks like.



The highest officials within the CIA were aware of the statement prior to its publication. CIA’s Chief Operating Officer (COO) Andrew Makridis testified that he informed Director Gina Haspel or Deputy Director Vaughn Frederick Bishop about its impending release. This sequence of events suggests that senior CIA leadership had ample opportunity to assess the validity of the statement's claims. Furthermore, the COO’s office appeared to signal approval of the statement in a move that departed from standard Prepublication Classification Review Board (PCRB) protocols.

Additionally, some of the statement's signatories were on active contract with the CIA at the time they issued the statement to discredit damaging allegations about Biden family influence peddling. Despite claiming they lacked access to classified information at the time, at least two signatories—Michael Morell and former CIA Inspector General David Buckley—were actively working for the CIA as contractors. This revelation raises concerns that these officials may have abused their positions to expedite the statement's approval and may have been earning taxpayer dollars while they did it.

Furthermore, officials within the CIA recognized at the time that the Hunter Biden statement was political and would hurt the Agency. The signatories’ decision to leverage their former intelligence community titles to promote a narrative about foreign election interference improperly embroiled the Agency in domestic politics. This report underscores the potential dangers of a politicized intelligence community.

They should all be fired - for spreading Russian misinformation.