Impeachment articles hit judge who ordered Trump to stop Tren de Aragua deportation flights

[The Sage of Main Street]

LOL Under your interpretation, we can employ mercenaries to invade Mexico and claim we're not involved in the invasion.

Interesting.

Mexico Is America's Gaza

So what if we did? Mercs will get the job done; our tranny troops will surrender in order to get a long and hot enchilada up their buttholes.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Judges are the backbone of democracy. They’re there to make sure we live up to the laws and Constitution. Attacks on the judiciary are fascism writ large.

Gawking at Gavels

Those black robes really turn you on, huh?

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Roberts is correct, unfortunately

The Real Steal

Incorrect, going way back. Jefferson threatened to impeach the Marbury usurpers, based strictly on the way they had ruled.

Rightists won't revoke judicial review because they hope to use it for their own ends. That proves they don't really care about "legislating from the bench."

 

[Mac-7]

The Real Steal

Incorrect, going way back. Jefferson threatened to impeach the Marbury usurpers, based strictly on the way they had ruled.

Rightists won't revoke judicial review because they hope to use it for their own ends. That proves they don't really care about "legislating from the bench."

I think the SC will not see it your way

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Gawking at Gavels

Those black robes really turn you on, huh?

They seem kind of swishy to me.

 

[skye]

El Salvador Out There Calling It Like It Is …

 

[konradv]

Gawking at Gavels

Those black robes really turn you on, huh?

They’re the bulwark of democracy right now, regardless of your tasteless fetish joke.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

They’re the bulwark of democracy right now, regardless of your tasteless fetish joke.

The Constitution's Crowned Clowns

I can understand Straight women worshipping judges, because the gavel looks like a dildo. That's also why dykes go for dyke judges.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

I think the SC will not see it your way

What We See Is What SCROTUS Doesn't Get

 

[Mac-7]

What We See Is What SCROTUS Doesn't Get

Unfortunately the Roberts court cannot be trusted to do the right thing

 

[Leo123]

View attachment 1090861

I wasn't appropriate for Democrats to impeach Trump either. Cry me a river.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Start filing a few dozen ethics complaints.

 

[Contumacious]

View attachment 1090861

re: Evil John Roberts​

Thomas DiLorenzo

A friend writes to remind us that Chief Justice John Roberts signed off on those illegal and fraudulent FISA warrants that started this whole three-year crusade to overturn the 2016 election. In other words, he was in on the Hillary/DNC/CIA plot to overthrow the government from the very beginning. No wonder he prohibited Rand Paul from asking about the “anonymous” CIA bureaucrat who conspired with Schiff to frame Trump. For this he should be impeached if not prosecuted.

And by the way, Rand Paul did not call the CIA bureaucrat a “whistleblower,” he only cited the spook’s name. If no one — including Roberts — knows who the “whistleblower” is, then how did Roberts know to censor Rand Paul? He was just asking a question about contacts between the named spook and Schiff’s staff. The same goes for Schiff himself. In his House Kangaroo Court, he stopped everything when one of the Republicans appeared about to mention the “whistleblower’s” name, while claiming to this day that he doesn’t know who it is. They’re both lying through their teeth, as usual.

re: Evil John Roberts - LRC Blog

Lew, A friend writes to remind us that Chief Justice John Roberts signed off on those illegal and fraudulent FISA warrants that started this whole three-year crusade to overturn the 2016 election. In other words, he was in on the Hillary/DNC/CIA plot to overthrow the government from the very...

www.lewrockwell.com

 

[Contumacious]

So you want to persecute judges who aren’t conservative?

Impeach judges who refuse to abide by the Constitution and who act like politicians in black robes

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Impeach judges who refuse to abide by the Constitution and who act like politicians in black robes

Who better than a Judge to Judge what is and is not constitutional? That's what Judges do - they Judge.

Congress have the option to impeach in which case they should pursue that and stop whining about it, just get on with it for God's sake.

But one doesn't (never has either) impeach a Judge because his view of what is constitutional differs from the President's, that's what the Supreme Court is for. Impeachment is not intended as a way to resolve a legal question.

 

[Contumacious]

Who better than a Judge to Judge what is and is not constitutional? That's what Judges do - they Judge.

Congress have the option to impeach in which case they should pursue that and stop whining about it, just get on with it for God's sake.

But one doesn't (never has either) impeach a Judge because his view of what is constitutional differs from the President's, that's what the Supreme Court is for. Impeachment is not intended as a way to resolve a legal question.

A Judge declares the law which based on our Constitution must favor INDIDUAL LIBERTY

 

[Leo123]

Who better than a Judge to Judge what is and is not constitutional? That's what Judges do - they Judge.

Congress have the option to impeach in which case they should pursue that and stop whining about it, just get on with it for God's sake.

But one doesn't (never has either) impeach a Judge because his view of what is constitutional differs from the President's, that's what the Supreme Court is for. Impeachment is not intended as a way to resolve a legal question.

Real judges don't challenge a President doing their Constitutional duty. Congress can also nullify his court. Only anti-American Marxists would do what this judge did.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The judge isn't creating law.

He's applying the law passed by Congress.

You know, the one Trump took an oath to faithfully execute.

WW

No, he is not. That is the problem. The law says the President can do exactly what he did. The judge is inventing some requirement for a due process hearing that isn't in the law, and he applied it to every single person being deported.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

You flagged my post as fake news.

What law did Trump attempt to invoke and what are the conditions for invoking the law?

Do you know?

WW

You apparently do not.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The judge should not be impeached over his rulings. He should be impeached because of the unethical conduct that caused and resulted from his rulings. That would require an investigation as to his political leanings and donations as well as past acts and rulings.

No one is impeaching anyone. You cannot impeach a judge for disagreeing with his ruling as long as he can be appealed.