Impeaching Barr Could Put Hurt On SC Nomination

okfine

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2019
Messages
8,766
Reaction score
3,991
Points
210
Location
805
Playing dirty goes both ways and some D's know how to play just the same.
Impeach Bill Barr. Stall the Amy Coney Barrett confirmation.

"Progressive activists are urging House Democrats to essentially kill two birds with one stone by impeaching Attorney General Bill Barr — which would delay the confirmation vote for Judge Amy Coney Barrett."

“Should you impeach Attorney General Barr prior to October 3rd, the Senate would be required to take one of two actions. On one hand, the Senate would be obligated to hold a trial, which would occupy a day or more of floor time and delay the hasty and irregular consideration of Amy Coney Barrett as a Supreme Court associate justice,” the groups explained. “In the alternative, Senate Republican leadership would be forced to go ‘nuclear’ by changing the rules that govern how that chamber responds to receiving articles of impeachment from the House of Representatives.”

 
Last edited:

flacaltenn

Diamond Member
Staff member
Senior USMB Moderator
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2011
Messages
61,424
Reaction score
16,239
Points
2,180
Location
Hillbilly Hollywood, Tenn
Playing dirty goes both ways and some D's know how to play just the same.
Impeach Bill Barr. Stall the Amy Coney Barrett confirmation.

"Progressive activists are urging House Democrats to essentially kill two birds with one stone by impeaching Attorney General Bill Barr — which would delay the confirmation vote for Judge Amy Coney Barrett."

“Should you impeach Attorney General Barr prior to October 32rd, the Senate would be required to take one of two actions. On one hand, the Senate would be obligated to hold a trial, which would occupy a day or more of floor time and delay the hasty and irregular consideration of Amy Coney Barrett as a Supreme Court associate justice,” the groups explained. “In the alternative, Senate Republican leadership would be forced to go ‘nuclear’ by changing the rules that govern how that chamber responds to receiving articles of impeachment from the House of Representatives.”

Rawstory AGAIN?? Did ya think about the Logistics here? In 2 weeks the congress is gonna adjourn.. ACB will be a SUpCt judge.. Impeachment has to go thru COMMITTEE in the House and to the house floor.. You expect ANYTHING DONE in a week that America would respect? Or that had enough evidence and WITNESS TESTIMONY to go forward in the Senate??

Reposting the latest Rawstory crap is just a waste of internet bandwidth.. BECAUSE -- it's raw... With ZERO thought behind the assertions..

Your leadership has left the Deranged zip code.. Now they live in DELUSIONAL world.. Impeaching Barr would NOT STOP the SupCt process -- because it could not get of the HOUSE in less than 2 weeks.. And at that much "solemn respect" for justice -- it would be another boomerang piece of crap that just covers your party for the past 4 years..
 

flacaltenn

Diamond Member
Staff member
Senior USMB Moderator
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2011
Messages
61,424
Reaction score
16,239
Points
2,180
Location
Hillbilly Hollywood, Tenn
“Should you impeach Attorney General Barr prior to October 32rd,

Did you actually copy "October 32rd" from the article or are leftists on their own calendar now? LOL...

EDIT -- Or is RawStory now just BLATANTLY making fools of folks that believe their crap???
 
OP
okfine

okfine

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2019
Messages
8,766
Reaction score
3,991
Points
210
Location
805
Playing dirty goes both ways and some D's know how to play just the same.
Impeach Bill Barr. Stall the Amy Coney Barrett confirmation.

"Progressive activists are urging House Democrats to essentially kill two birds with one stone by impeaching Attorney General Bill Barr — which would delay the confirmation vote for Judge Amy Coney Barrett."

“Should you impeach Attorney General Barr prior to October 32rd, the Senate would be required to take one of two actions. On one hand, the Senate would be obligated to hold a trial, which would occupy a day or more of floor time and delay the hasty and irregular consideration of Amy Coney Barrett as a Supreme Court associate justice,” the groups explained. “In the alternative, Senate Republican leadership would be forced to go ‘nuclear’ by changing the rules that govern how that chamber responds to receiving articles of impeachment from the House of Representatives.”

Rawstory AGAIN?? Did ya think about the Logistics here? In 2 weeks the congress is gonna adjourn.. ACB will be a SUpCt judge.. Impeachment has to go thru COMMITTEE in the House and to the house floor.. You expect ANYTHING DONE in a week that America would respect? Or that had enough evidence and WITNESS TESTIMONY to go forward in the Senate??

Reposting the latest Rawstory crap is just a waste of internet bandwidth.. BECAUSE -- it's raw... With ZERO thought behind the assertions..

Your leadership has left the Deranged zip code.. Now they live in DELUSIONAL world.. Impeaching Barr would NOT STOP the SupCt process -- because it could not get of the HOUSE in less than 2 weeks.. And at that much "solemn respect" for justice -- it would be another boomerang piece of crap that just covers your party for the past 4 years..
When I take your response to the chopsaw (like I did Before) will you be honest and go away?
 

Sun Devil 92

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2015
Messages
32,084
Reaction score
11,049
Points
1,410
Playing dirty goes both ways and some D's know how to play just the same.
Impeach Bill Barr. Stall the Amy Coney Barrett confirmation.

"Progressive activists are urging House Democrats to essentially kill two birds with one stone by impeaching Attorney General Bill Barr — which would delay the confirmation vote for Judge Amy Coney Barrett."

“Should you impeach Attorney General Barr prior to October 32rd, the Senate would be required to take one of two actions. On one hand, the Senate would be obligated to hold a trial, which would occupy a day or more of floor time and delay the hasty and irregular consideration of Amy Coney Barrett as a Supreme Court associate justice,” the groups explained. “In the alternative, Senate Republican leadership would be forced to go ‘nuclear’ by changing the rules that govern how that chamber responds to receiving articles of impeachment from the House of Representatives.”

Rawstory AGAIN?? Did ya think about the Logistics here? In 2 weeks the congress is gonna adjourn.. ACB will be a SUpCt judge.. Impeachment has to go thru COMMITTEE in the House and to the house floor.. You expect ANYTHING DONE in a week that America would respect? Or that had enough evidence and WITNESS TESTIMONY to go forward in the Senate??

Reposting the latest Rawstory crap is just a waste of internet bandwidth.. BECAUSE -- it's raw... With ZERO thought behind the assertions..

Your leadership has left the Deranged zip code.. Now they live in DELUSIONAL world.. Impeaching Barr would NOT STOP the SupCt process -- because it could not get of the HOUSE in less than 2 weeks.. And at that much "solemn respect" for justice -- it would be another boomerang piece of crap that just covers your party for the past 4 years..
The OP has been flooding the board with new threads with all this shit. Kinda makes you wonder where he's getting his order from. We know the Biden campaign is seriously concerned they could lose. The see that the polling is bullshit and really don't know what to expect.

Trump supporters are not worred.

This clown is truly scarred.
 

Sun Devil 92

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2015
Messages
32,084
Reaction score
11,049
Points
1,410
Playing dirty goes both ways and some D's know how to play just the same.
Impeach Bill Barr. Stall the Amy Coney Barrett confirmation.

"Progressive activists are urging House Democrats to essentially kill two birds with one stone by impeaching Attorney General Bill Barr — which would delay the confirmation vote for Judge Amy Coney Barrett."

“Should you impeach Attorney General Barr prior to October 32rd, the Senate would be required to take one of two actions. On one hand, the Senate would be obligated to hold a trial, which would occupy a day or more of floor time and delay the hasty and irregular consideration of Amy Coney Barrett as a Supreme Court associate justice,” the groups explained. “In the alternative, Senate Republican leadership would be forced to go ‘nuclear’ by changing the rules that govern how that chamber responds to receiving articles of impeachment from the House of Representatives.”

Rawstory AGAIN?? Did ya think about the Logistics here? In 2 weeks the congress is gonna adjourn.. ACB will be a SUpCt judge.. Impeachment has to go thru COMMITTEE in the House and to the house floor.. You expect ANYTHING DONE in a week that America would respect? Or that had enough evidence and WITNESS TESTIMONY to go forward in the Senate??

Reposting the latest Rawstory crap is just a waste of internet bandwidth.. BECAUSE -- it's raw... With ZERO thought behind the assertions..

Your leadership has left the Deranged zip code.. Now they live in DELUSIONAL world.. Impeaching Barr would NOT STOP the SupCt process -- because it could not get of the HOUSE in less than 2 weeks.. And at that much "solemn respect" for justice -- it would be another boomerang piece of crap that just covers your party for the past 4 years..
When I take your response to the chopsaw (like I did Before) will you be honest and go away?
You are a fucking liar.

You are really acting out of control making claims you can't back up....posting bullshit from rags that are sucking Moa's dick......and trying to make yourself feel better about Bidens impending defeat.
 

Sun Devil 92

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2015
Messages
32,084
Reaction score
11,049
Points
1,410
Playing dirty goes both ways and some D's know how to play just the same.
Impeach Bill Barr. Stall the Amy Coney Barrett confirmation.

"Progressive activists are urging House Democrats to essentially kill two birds with one stone by impeaching Attorney General Bill Barr — which would delay the confirmation vote for Judge Amy Coney Barrett."

“Should you impeach Attorney General Barr prior to October 32rd, the Senate would be required to take one of two actions. On one hand, the Senate would be obligated to hold a trial, which would occupy a day or more of floor time and delay the hasty and irregular consideration of Amy Coney Barrett as a Supreme Court associate justice,” the groups explained. “In the alternative, Senate Republican leadership would be forced to go ‘nuclear’ by changing the rules that govern how that chamber responds to receiving articles of impeachment from the House of Representatives.”

Rawstory AGAIN?? Did ya think about the Logistics here? In 2 weeks the congress is gonna adjourn.. ACB will be a SUpCt judge.. Impeachment has to go thru COMMITTEE in the House and to the house floor.. You expect ANYTHING DONE in a week that America would respect? Or that had enough evidence and WITNESS TESTIMONY to go forward in the Senate??

Reposting the latest Rawstory crap is just a waste of internet bandwidth.. BECAUSE -- it's raw... With ZERO thought behind the assertions..

Your leadership has left the Deranged zip code.. Now they live in DELUSIONAL world.. Impeaching Barr would NOT STOP the SupCt process -- because it could not get of the HOUSE in less than 2 weeks.. And at that much "solemn respect" for justice -- it would be another boomerang piece of crap that just covers your party for the past 4 years..
When I take your response to the chopsaw (like I did Before) will you be honest and go away?
Please link us to the fantasy post where you took the most respected member of the board's post to the chopsaw.

The best you could hope for is to not cut off both of your hands and your tiny balls at the same time.
 
OP
okfine

okfine

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2019
Messages
8,766
Reaction score
3,991
Points
210
Location
805
“Should you impeach Attorney General Barr prior to October 32rd,

Did you actually copy "October 32rd" from the article or are leftists on their own calendar now? LOL...

EDIT -- Or is RawStory now just BLATANTLY making fools of folks that believe their crap???
It was their typo. I believe the 3rd is correct Mr. Nitpicker.
 

SassyIrishLass

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Messages
67,216
Reaction score
25,095
Points
2,250
I might start reading Rawstory for my daily eye roll
 
OP
okfine

okfine

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2019
Messages
8,766
Reaction score
3,991
Points
210
Location
805
Democrats putting out more "Barr is the Devil" stories. A shoe must be about to drop and they are trying to get out in front of it.
He is not a recipient for any ethics or credibility awards let alone his true disdain of the Constitution.
 

flacaltenn

Diamond Member
Staff member
Senior USMB Moderator
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2011
Messages
61,424
Reaction score
16,239
Points
2,180
Location
Hillbilly Hollywood, Tenn
Playing dirty goes both ways and some D's know how to play just the same.
Impeach Bill Barr. Stall the Amy Coney Barrett confirmation.

"Progressive activists are urging House Democrats to essentially kill two birds with one stone by impeaching Attorney General Bill Barr — which would delay the confirmation vote for Judge Amy Coney Barrett."

“Should you impeach Attorney General Barr prior to October 32rd, the Senate would be required to take one of two actions. On one hand, the Senate would be obligated to hold a trial, which would occupy a day or more of floor time and delay the hasty and irregular consideration of Amy Coney Barrett as a Supreme Court associate justice,” the groups explained. “In the alternative, Senate Republican leadership would be forced to go ‘nuclear’ by changing the rules that govern how that chamber responds to receiving articles of impeachment from the House of Representatives.”

Rawstory AGAIN?? Did ya think about the Logistics here? In 2 weeks the congress is gonna adjourn.. ACB will be a SUpCt judge.. Impeachment has to go thru COMMITTEE in the House and to the house floor.. You expect ANYTHING DONE in a week that America would respect? Or that had enough evidence and WITNESS TESTIMONY to go forward in the Senate??

Reposting the latest Rawstory crap is just a waste of internet bandwidth.. BECAUSE -- it's raw... With ZERO thought behind the assertions..

Your leadership has left the Deranged zip code.. Now they live in DELUSIONAL world.. Impeaching Barr would NOT STOP the SupCt process -- because it could not get of the HOUSE in less than 2 weeks.. And at that much "solemn respect" for justice -- it would be another boomerang piece of crap that just covers your party for the past 4 years..
When I take your response to the chopsaw (like I did Before) will you be honest and go away?
With my tail tucked behind my legs? Probably not.. Give a go.. You GOT a chopsaw? Because obviously your story doesn't even have a calendar or realize that the ACB hearings are in the SENATE and impeachments START in the House...
 

Sun Devil 92

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2015
Messages
32,084
Reaction score
11,049
Points
1,410
“Should you impeach Attorney General Barr prior to October 32rd,

Did you actually copy "October 32rd" from the article or are leftists on their own calendar now? LOL...

EDIT -- Or is RawStory now just BLATANTLY making fools of folks that believe their crap???
It was their typo. I believe the 3rd is correct Mr. Nitpicker.
Democrats putting out more "Barr is the Devil" stories. A shoe must be about to drop and they are trying to get out in front of it.
He is not a recipient for any ethics or credibility awards let alone his true disdain of the Constitution.
You might want to quit while the few nanograms of credibility you have left are still in tact.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top