Immigration LAW 1907. TITLE 8, U.S.C. 1324

[The Original Tree]

I am amazed at how many people who hate the federal government thinks their state and local governments should bow down before the feds on this one issue. So much for "States' Rights" LOL.

I would be 100% with you that the states should decide what to do with illegals that show up in their state. But they should not welcome the illegals and then allow the illegals to go wherever they want and do whatever they want to do in other states.

So if your state wants to take in all the illegals great. But keep them there. And the people of your state should feed, clothe, educate, provide healthcare, and whatever else they need and allow them to fly whatever flag, demand whatever rules and regs and policies and facilities accommodate their culture and language, commit whatever crimes they want to commit with immunity from prosecution, grant them all the privileges of citizenship with none of the responsibilities, vote themselves into leadership positions, and reduce the host state to the third world environment the illegals came here to escape. And the rest of us should be left alone about it.

Deal?

Your second paragraph ran that train right off the tracks. Immigration is a federal issue and therefore a federal responsibility to enforce.

FEDERAL LAW takes precedence over State Law and all States have to comply with Federal Law.

Lets see a STATE refuse to comply with sending Income Taxes to The Treasury, and lets see what happens?

Maybe California should stop all transfers of any Federal Taxes to The Federal Government, as a "Social Experiment"

Any American can experiment with Federal Laws by simply becoming a Drug Dealer or heck, just refuse to pay your taxes.

Income Tax laws applies to the individual, not the states. The right has become unhinged by their hatred. As a progressive, I hate to see any species go extinct, but I might make an exception in my thinking for for homo republicanus.

Please explain your goofy comment about Hatred and Enforcing Laws Congress has passed.

Corporations are Individuals in some respect, so let's see what happens to Google if they as an Individual decide on their own to refuse to comply with Federal Tax laws, and lets see what happens to California if they choose to do the same.

Do you think STATES and Individuals and Corporations are IMMUNE from Federal LAW?

Or do you forget O Dumb Asses, Obamacare MANDATE PENALTY?

Do you think The FBI and ICE are not allowed to cross State Lines and Enforce FEDERAL LAW just because you as an Anti-American Lawless individual Hates The Law?

 

[BrokeLoser]

I am amazed at how many people who hate the federal government thinks their state and local governments should bow down before the feds on this one issue. So much for "States' Rights" LOL.

I would be 100% with you that the states should decide what to do with illegals that show up in their state. But they should not welcome the illegals and then allow the illegals to go wherever they want and do whatever they want to do in other states.

So if your state wants to take in all the illegals great. But keep them there. And the people of your state should feed, clothe, educate, provide healthcare, and whatever else they need and allow them to fly whatever flag, demand whatever rules and regs and policies and facilities accommodate their culture and language, commit whatever crimes they want to commit with immunity from prosecution, grant them all the privileges of citizenship with none of the responsibilities, vote themselves into leadership positions, and reduce the host state to the third world environment the illegals came here to escape. And the rest of us should be left alone about it.

Deal?

Your second paragraph ran that train right off the tracks. Immigration is a federal issue and therefore a federal responsibility to enforce.

FEDERAL LAW takes precedence over State Law and all States have to comply with Federal Law.

Lets see a STATE refuse to comply with sending Income Taxes to The Treasury, and lets see what happens?

Maybe California should stop all transfers of any Federal Taxes to The Federal Government, as a "Social Experiment"

Any American can experiment with Federal Laws by simply becoming a Drug Dealer or heck, just refuse to pay your taxes.

Income Tax laws applies to the individual, not the states. The right has become unhinged by their hatred. As a progressive, I hate to see any species go extinct, but I might make an exception in my thinking for for homo republicanus.

LefTard Logic:
Republicans = Bad
Filthy Wetbacks = Good

 

[Claudette]

If the laws were followed they would stop coming.

No education for their illegal kids, no housing, no food stamps, no health care, no jobs.

No reason to come to the US so they stay home.

Oh and if a woman has an anchor baby. Deport her ass. The baby goes where she goes.

More than works for me.

 

[The Original Tree]

I am amazed at how many people who hate the federal government thinks their state and local governments should bow down before the feds on this one issue. So much for "States' Rights" LOL.

I would be 100% with you that the states should decide what to do with illegals that show up in their state. But they should not welcome the illegals and then allow the illegals to go wherever they want and do whatever they want to do in other states.

So if your state wants to take in all the illegals great. But keep them there. And the people of your state should feed, clothe, educate, provide healthcare, and whatever else they need and allow them to fly whatever flag, demand whatever rules and regs and policies and facilities accommodate their culture and language, commit whatever crimes they want to commit with immunity from prosecution, grant them all the privileges of citizenship with none of the responsibilities, vote themselves into leadership positions, and reduce the host state to the third world environment the illegals came here to escape. And the rest of us should be left alone about it.

Deal?

Your second paragraph ran that train right off the tracks. Immigration is a federal issue and therefore a federal responsibility to enforce.

FEDERAL LAW takes precedence over State Law and all States have to comply with Federal Law.

Lets see a STATE refuse to comply with sending Income Taxes to The Treasury, and lets see what happens?

Maybe California should stop all transfers of any Federal Taxes to The Federal Government, as a "Social Experiment"

Any American can experiment with Federal Laws by simply becoming a Drug Dealer or heck, just refuse to pay your taxes.

Income Tax laws applies to the individual, not the states. The right has become unhinged by their hatred. As a progressive, I hate to see any species go extinct, but I might make an exception in my thinking for for homo republicanus.

Immigration laws apply to both citizen and States. Leave it to a progressive to get it exactly wrong.

Tell Me then. I guess the Feds were wrong to stop Arizona from enforcing immigration law and that lawsuit should be tossed out.

After all, States can just ignore federal law, right?

Why is The LEFT engaged in a Full On Rebellion over Enforcing Already Existing Immigration Laws?

And why are Leftist Politicians Committing Federal Crimes by trying to aide and abet Illegal Aliens and Obstruct Federal Law Enforcement?

 

[BrokeLoser]

There is way too much misinformation and FLAT OUT DISGUSTING LIES, and Attempts to Deceive The American Public, and Dishonestly and Callously Paint Americans who want to see Immigration Law, Enforced and our Borders Secured as Racist.

There is ZERO MENTION OF RACE in our Immigration LAW. It only addresses the Illegal Act of Entering The Country without Authorization, and the Illegals Acts of Harboring, Transporting and Aiding Such People. It is even illegal to give an Illegal any kind of Official State Identification.

Sanctuary Cities are Illegal. Not Cooperating with ICE is Illegal. Helping Illegals Evade Law Enforcement Is Illegal. Even Giving an Illegal Access to Transportation is Illegal.

Giving them Free Healthcare and Government Benefits are ILLEGAL!

Read and Weep. This is an Invasion, and it is Conscious Law Breaking by The Lawless Democrat Party.

They have declared a CIVIL WAR upon America and upon The RULE OF LAW!

It is necessary for me to post the entire section of US Code that deals with this so that there is ZERO wiggle Room for the Liars and Propagandist who hate this country to IGNORE WHAT THE LAW SAYS!

1907. TITLE 8, U.S.C. 1324

Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and abetting any of the preceding acts. Subsection 1324(a)(2) prohibits bringing or attempting to bring unauthorized aliens to the United States in any manner whatsoever, even at a designated port of entry. Subsection 1324(a)(3).

Alien Smuggling -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(i) makes it an offense for any person who -- knowing that a person is an alien, to bring to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such person at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States and regardless of any future official action which may be taken with respect to such alien.

Domestic Transporting -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) makes it an offense for any person who -- knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, transports, or moves or attempts to transport or move such alien within the United States by means of transportation or otherwise, in furtherance of such violation of law.

Harboring -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) makes it an offense for any person who -- knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation.

Encouraging/Inducing -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) makes it an offense for any person who -- encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law.

Conspiracy/Aiding or Abetting -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(v) expressly makes it an offense to engage in a conspiracy to commit or aid or abet the commission of the foregoing offenses.

Bringing Aliens to the United States -- Subsection 1324(a)(2) makes it an offense for any person who -- knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has not received prior authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, to bring to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever, such alien, regardless of any official action which may later be taken with respect to such alien.

The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA), enacted on September 30, 1996, added a new 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(3)(A) which makes it an offense for any person, during any 12-month period, to knowingly hire at least 10 individuals with actual knowledge that these individuals are unauthorized aliens. See this Manual at 1908 (unlawful employment of aliens).

Unit of Prosecution -- With regard to offenses defined in subsections 1324(a)(1)(A)(i)-(v), (alien smuggling, domestic transporting, harboring, encouraging/inducing, or conspiracy/aiding or abetting) each alien with respect to whom a violation occurs constitutes a unit of prosecution. Prior to enactment of the IIRIRA, the unit of prosecution for violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2) was each transaction, regardless of the number of aliens involved. However, the unit of prosecution is now based on each alien in respect to whom a violation occurs.

Knowledge -- Prosecutions for alien smuggling, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(i) require proof that defendant knew that the person brought to the United States was an alien. With regard to the other violations in 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a), proof of knowledge or reckless disregard of alienage is sufficient.

Penalties -- The basic statutory maximum penalty for violating 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(i) and (v)(I) (alien smuggling and conspiracy) is a fine under title 18, imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both. With regard to violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(ii)-(iv) and (v)(ii), domestic transportation, harboring, encouraging/inducing, or aiding/abetting, the basic statutory maximum term of imprisonment is 5 years, unless the offense was committed for commercial advantage or private financial gain, in which case the maximum term of imprisonment is 10 years. In addition, significant enhanced penalties are provided for in violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1) involving serious bodily injury or placing life in jeopardy. Moreover, if the violation results in the death of any person, the defendant may be punished by death or by imprisonment for any term of years. The basic penalty for a violation of subsection 1324(a)(2) is a fine under title 18, imprisonment for not more than one year, or both, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(A). Enhanced penalties are provided for violations involving bringing in criminal aliens, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(i), offenses done for commercial advantage or private financial gain, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii), and violations where the alien is not presented to an immigration officer immediately upon arrival, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(iii). A mandatory minimum three year term of imprisonment applies to first or second violations of § 1324(a)(2)(B)(i) or (B)(ii). Further enhanced punishment is provided for third or subsequent offenses.

COMMENT: Further discussion of offenses defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a) is set forth in Chapter 3 of Immigration Law, published as part of the Office of Legal Education's Litigation Series, and as part of the USABook computer library.

1907. Title 8, U.S.C. 1324(a) Offenses

It is for this reason that I call GOP’ers nutless cowards....Not one of them have the balls to inject this into the narrative.
Pretty fucking sad.

 

[The Original Tree]

There is way too much misinformation and FLAT OUT DISGUSTING LIES, and Attempts to Deceive The American Public, and Dishonestly and Callously Paint Americans who want to see Immigration Law, Enforced and our Borders Secured as Racist.

There is ZERO MENTION OF RACE in our Immigration LAW. It only addresses the Illegal Act of Entering The Country without Authorization, and the Illegals Acts of Harboring, Transporting and Aiding Such People. It is even illegal to give an Illegal any kind of Official State Identification.

Sanctuary Cities are Illegal. Not Cooperating with ICE is Illegal. Helping Illegals Evade Law Enforcement Is Illegal. Even Giving an Illegal Access to Transportation is Illegal.

Giving them Free Healthcare and Government Benefits are ILLEGAL!

Read and Weep. This is an Invasion, and it is Conscious Law Breaking by The Lawless Democrat Party.

They have declared a CIVIL WAR upon America and upon The RULE OF LAW!

It is necessary for me to post the entire section of US Code that deals with this so that there is ZERO wiggle Room for the Liars and Propagandist who hate this country to IGNORE WHAT THE LAW SAYS!

1907. TITLE 8, U.S.C. 1324

Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and abetting any of the preceding acts. Subsection 1324(a)(2) prohibits bringing or attempting to bring unauthorized aliens to the United States in any manner whatsoever, even at a designated port of entry. Subsection 1324(a)(3).

Alien Smuggling -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(i) makes it an offense for any person who -- knowing that a person is an alien, to bring to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such person at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States and regardless of any future official action which may be taken with respect to such alien.

Domestic Transporting -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) makes it an offense for any person who -- knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, transports, or moves or attempts to transport or move such alien within the United States by means of transportation or otherwise, in furtherance of such violation of law.

Harboring -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) makes it an offense for any person who -- knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation.

Encouraging/Inducing -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) makes it an offense for any person who -- encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law.

Conspiracy/Aiding or Abetting -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(v) expressly makes it an offense to engage in a conspiracy to commit or aid or abet the commission of the foregoing offenses.

Bringing Aliens to the United States -- Subsection 1324(a)(2) makes it an offense for any person who -- knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has not received prior authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, to bring to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever, such alien, regardless of any official action which may later be taken with respect to such alien.

The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA), enacted on September 30, 1996, added a new 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(3)(A) which makes it an offense for any person, during any 12-month period, to knowingly hire at least 10 individuals with actual knowledge that these individuals are unauthorized aliens. See this Manual at 1908 (unlawful employment of aliens).

Unit of Prosecution -- With regard to offenses defined in subsections 1324(a)(1)(A)(i)-(v), (alien smuggling, domestic transporting, harboring, encouraging/inducing, or conspiracy/aiding or abetting) each alien with respect to whom a violation occurs constitutes a unit of prosecution. Prior to enactment of the IIRIRA, the unit of prosecution for violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2) was each transaction, regardless of the number of aliens involved. However, the unit of prosecution is now based on each alien in respect to whom a violation occurs.

Knowledge -- Prosecutions for alien smuggling, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(i) require proof that defendant knew that the person brought to the United States was an alien. With regard to the other violations in 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a), proof of knowledge or reckless disregard of alienage is sufficient.

Penalties -- The basic statutory maximum penalty for violating 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(i) and (v)(I) (alien smuggling and conspiracy) is a fine under title 18, imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both. With regard to violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(ii)-(iv) and (v)(ii), domestic transportation, harboring, encouraging/inducing, or aiding/abetting, the basic statutory maximum term of imprisonment is 5 years, unless the offense was committed for commercial advantage or private financial gain, in which case the maximum term of imprisonment is 10 years. In addition, significant enhanced penalties are provided for in violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1) involving serious bodily injury or placing life in jeopardy. Moreover, if the violation results in the death of any person, the defendant may be punished by death or by imprisonment for any term of years. The basic penalty for a violation of subsection 1324(a)(2) is a fine under title 18, imprisonment for not more than one year, or both, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(A). Enhanced penalties are provided for violations involving bringing in criminal aliens, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(i), offenses done for commercial advantage or private financial gain, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii), and violations where the alien is not presented to an immigration officer immediately upon arrival, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(iii). A mandatory minimum three year term of imprisonment applies to first or second violations of § 1324(a)(2)(B)(i) or (B)(ii). Further enhanced punishment is provided for third or subsequent offenses.

COMMENT: Further discussion of offenses defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a) is set forth in Chapter 3 of Immigration Law, published as part of the Office of Legal Education's Litigation Series, and as part of the USABook computer library.

1907. Title 8, U.S.C. 1324(a) Offenses

It is for this reason that I call GOP’ers nutless cowards....Not one of them have the balls to inject this into the narrative.
Pretty fucking sad.

We should be prosecuting politicians who break The Law. Over half The Democrat Party should be locked up.

Not shocked at all The Dem Tards on this board don't want to talk about Immigration Law!

They are breaking it every day.

 

[The Original Tree]

More Free Shit for Illegal Aliens. It is ILLEGAL to help them avoid Law Enforcement or Deportation.

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6060834748001/

 

[The Original Tree]

Democrat Policies Literally Kill People, including Illegals.

Dr. Drew sounds off on California's homeless crisis: ‘How many must die’ before officials take action?

Dr. Drew Pinsky blasted public officials for failing to tackle the mounting homeless crisis that has overtaken Los Angeles in recent years.

Appearing on Fox Nation's "One Smart Person and Greg Gutfeld" and "The Five," Pinsky explained that public officials are looking at the wrong culprit, focusing their efforts on providing housing for the thousands of homeless that occupy the city.

“They are mandating the focus on housing, for a population for whom housing will not solve any of their problems," Pinsky told Gutfeld.

HOMELESSNESS JUMPS 12 PERCENT

In 2018 alone, California spent $600 million to tackle the spread of homeless encampments across the city – only to see the total number of homeless rise 16 percent to around 60,000 people, according to a recent count. An alarming new report revealed the rise in homelessness is fueling a rat infestation across the state.

 

[The Original Tree]

I am amazed at how many people who hate the federal government thinks their state and local governments should bow down before the feds on this one issue. So much for "States' Rights" LOL.

I would be 100% with you that the states should decide what to do with illegals that show up in their state. But they should not welcome the illegals and then allow the illegals to go wherever they want and do whatever they want to do in other states.

So if your state wants to take in all the illegals great. But keep them there. And the people of your state should feed, clothe, educate, provide healthcare, and whatever else they need and allow them to fly whatever flag, demand whatever rules and regs and policies and facilities accommodate their culture and language, commit whatever crimes they want to commit with immunity from prosecution, grant them all the privileges of citizenship with none of the responsibilities, vote themselves into leadership positions, and reduce the host state to the third world environment the illegals came here to escape. And the rest of us should be left alone about it.

Deal?

Your second paragraph ran that train right off the tracks. Immigration is a federal issue and therefore a federal responsibility to enforce.

FEDERAL LAW takes precedence over State Law and all States have to comply with Federal Law.

Lets see a STATE refuse to comply with sending Income Taxes to The Treasury, and lets see what happens?

Maybe California should stop all transfers of any Federal Taxes to The Federal Government, as a "Social Experiment"

Any American can experiment with Federal Laws by simply becoming a Drug Dealer or heck, just refuse to pay your taxes.

Income Tax laws applies to the individual, not the states. The right has become unhinged by their hatred. As a progressive, I hate to see any species go extinct, but I might make an exception in my thinking for for homo republicanus.

LefTard Logic:
Republicans = Bad
Filthy Wetbacks = Good

Left Tard Logic:

Law Bad & Racist

Breaking The Law in the name of Resistance = Good!

COUP = Good

Accepting The Results of an Election = BAD

 

[The Original Tree]

Just a reminder to you Leftist Idiots who think you should have open borders and not restrict immigration so you can check people's backgrounds. There are Islamic Radicals migrating all over the world now, and if you let them in your country like The Left has let MS-13 in here eventually you are going to pay the price for your stupidity.+

ISIS supporters who beheaded Scandinavian hikers in Morocco sentenced to death

 

[The Original Tree]

Notice how The Left FEARS any threads about ACTUAL IMMIGRATION LAW. They don't even attempt to discuss it or challenge IMMIGRATION LAW.

College students surprised to learn Obama touted deportations of criminal aliens

College students largely reject President Trump's immigration policies as racist, but some were surprised to learn that former President Barack Obama also touted the deportation of criminal aliens, Campus Reform's Cabot Phillips said on "Fox & Friends" Friday.

In 2014, Obama touted his administration's deportation policy in an immigration address from the White House.

"We are a nation of laws. Undocumented workers broke our immigration laws, and I believe that they must be held accountable, especially those who may be dangerous. That’s why over the past six years deportations of criminals are up 80 percent, and that’s why we’re going to keep focusing on threats to our security," Obama said.

 

[The Original Tree]

California woman, boyfriend accused of strangling her day-old baby in hospital

A young mother has been accused of giving birth to a healthy baby boy in a California hospital and then strangling him a day later in the maternity ward with her boyfriend.

Doctors at St. John’s Medical Center in Oxnard made every effort to revive Baby Diego on Friday over a 10-hour period before declaring him dead, The Los Angeles Times reported.

Sgt. Brandon Ordelheide said the mother, Andrea Torralba, 20, and her boyfriend, David Villa, 21, told investigators Friday morning they had suffocated Baby Diego until he was unconscious, the paper reported.

Records showed both Torralba and Villa were born in Mexico; their citizenship status was unclear.

 

[Norman]

California woman, boyfriend accused of strangling her day-old baby in hospital

A young mother has been accused of giving birth to a healthy baby boy in a California hospital and then strangling him a day later in the maternity ward with her boyfriend.

Doctors at St. John’s Medical Center in Oxnard made every effort to revive Baby Diego on Friday over a 10-hour period before declaring him dead, The Los Angeles Times reported.

Sgt. Brandon Ordelheide said the mother, Andrea Torralba, 20, and her boyfriend, David Villa, 21, told investigators Friday morning they had suffocated Baby Diego until he was unconscious, the paper reported.

Records showed both Torralba and Villa were born in Mexico; their citizenship status was unclear.

They are sending their best.

 

[The Original Tree]

California woman, boyfriend accused of strangling her day-old baby in hospital

A young mother has been accused of giving birth to a healthy baby boy in a California hospital and then strangling him a day later in the maternity ward with her boyfriend.

Doctors at St. John’s Medical Center in Oxnard made every effort to revive Baby Diego on Friday over a 10-hour period before declaring him dead, The Los Angeles Times reported.

Sgt. Brandon Ordelheide said the mother, Andrea Torralba, 20, and her boyfriend, David Villa, 21, told investigators Friday morning they had suffocated Baby Diego until he was unconscious, the paper reported.

Records showed both Torralba and Villa were born in Mexico; their citizenship status was unclear.

They are sending their best.

When is The Democrat Party going to address Illegal Immigration? This should not be allowed to happen in America.

 

[The Original Tree]

Utah couple visiting Mexico fatally shot execution-style after failing to stop at checkpoint

A Utah couple that failed to stop at a police checkpoint in Mexico were ordered to get out of their car and were fatally shot execution-style in front of their 12-year-old son, according to reports.

Paul Nielsen, 52, and Janeth Vázquez, 43, and their son, Kevin, were traveling from Acapulco to a beach resort when they were killed as they drove through Petatlan last Thursday at 3.30 a.m, according to local news outlets.

Their son also was shot, but survived and suffered a nervous breakdown, the reports say. After he was released from a hospital, he was transported to the resort town of Zihuatanejo, where he gave law enforcement authorities an account of what happened.

When they reportedly failed to stop at the checkpoint, they were ordered to stop, get out of the car, and shot in the head at close range. The shooters then took their car and left.

 

[Norman]

Utah couple visiting Mexico fatally shot execution-style after failing to stop at checkpoint

A Utah couple that failed to stop at a police checkpoint in Mexico were ordered to get out of their car and were fatally shot execution-style in front of their 12-year-old son, according to reports.

Paul Nielsen, 52, and Janeth Vázquez, 43, and their son, Kevin, were traveling from Acapulco to a beach resort when they were killed as they drove through Petatlan last Thursday at 3.30 a.m, according to local news outlets.

Their son also was shot, but survived and suffered a nervous breakdown, the reports say. After he was released from a hospital, he was transported to the resort town of Zihuatanejo, where he gave law enforcement authorities an account of what happened.

When they reportedly failed to stop at the checkpoint, they were ordered to stop, get out of the car, and shot in the head at close range. The shooters then took their car and left.

Sure sounds like the culture leftists want to bring over.

 

[protectionist]

If the federal government passed a law confiscating all "assault weapons" and a local sheriff decided not to confiscate any "assault weapons", he is not guilty of harboring the owners of assault weapons.

The same goes for the made up term "sanctuary cities".

All caught up now, piss drinker?

We are all caught up. Right HERE >> US Code 8, Section 1324

8 U.S. Code § 1324. Bringing in and harboring certain aliens

(a) Criminal penalties
(1) (A) (iii) Any person who— knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation, is or will be in violation of law;
shall be punished as provided in subparagraph (B).
in respect to whom such a violation occurs—

(ii)
in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(ii), (iii), (iv), or (v)(II), be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;
(iii)
in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v) during and in relation to which the person causes serious bodily injury (as defined in section 1365 of title 18) to, or places in jeopardy the life of, any person, be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both; and
(iv)
in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v) resulting in the death of any person, be punished by death or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined under title 18, or both.

 

[busybee01]

It's time to start charging these Open Border, Sanctuary City Democrats with Federal Crimes which the penalties are 5-10 years in prison.

Let's start with anyone who encourages illegals to enter this country, and then move to arresting Mayors and Public Officials in Sanctuary Cities and Police Chiefs and Court Officials who refuse to cooperate with ICE and BP.

First of all they have to commit a crime. None of which has happened. You seem to think this is Nazi Germany where you can arrest anyone you want.

They have every right not to cooperate. ICE can deputize local law enforcement to enforce federal immigration law but they cannot be forced to do so. That shows that state and local law enforcement are not required to enforce federal immigration law.

The Laws I have posted say you LIE.

It is against The LAW not to cooperate with ICE or Border Patrol, and against The Law to Harbor, Transport, or Aide Illegal Aliens in any way.

The Jail time for such a crime is 5-10 years in prison.

You are a lying weasel. Law enforcement does NOT have to cooperate with ICE. Local law enforcement can be deputized only with that agency's permission.

 

[Jets]

I do not support sanctuary cities. No one has the right to enter the country illegally. Protocols are in place for the purpose of creating a path to citizenship. You do not get to come on thru a NONPORT of entry and get to play ASYLUM as a trump card when you are caught.

 

[gallantwarrior]

I am amazed at how many people who hate the federal government thinks their state and local governments should bow down before the feds on this one issue. So much for "States' Rights" LOL.

I would be 100% with you that the states should decide what to do with illegals that show up in their state. But they should not welcome the illegals and then allow the illegals to go wherever they want and do whatever they want to do in other states.

So if your state wants to take in all the illegals great. But keep them there. And the people of your state should feed, clothe, educate, provide healthcare, and whatever else they need and allow them to fly whatever flag, demand whatever rules and regs and policies and facilities accommodate their culture and language, commit whatever crimes they want to commit with immunity from prosecution, grant them all the privileges of citizenship with none of the responsibilities, vote themselves into leadership positions, and reduce the host state to the third world environment the illegals came here to escape. And the rest of us should be left alone about it.

Deal?

And those states that decide to follow the above course of action shall be denied all Federal funding that is used for any of the above activities.