Yeah, the polls in 2016 were just terrible...Clinton only won the popular vote (which is what polls predict) by 2.4%, not the 2 to 4 percent that most polls were predicting...
View attachment 223724
Do you truly believe that crap?
I'm just raising the question ... could the polls be wrong?
- Thread starter healthmyths
- Start date
Do you truly believe that crap?
Norman
Diamond Member
- Sep 24, 2010
- 31,254
- 15,235
- 1,590
Everyone here knows you were in that room. Cut the crap. And with comments such as "Christianity has nothing to do with god"... it's not hard to see how it happened.
Redfish
Diamond Member
Yeah, the polls in 2016 were just terrible...Clinton only won the popular vote (which is what polls predict) by 2.4%, not the 2 to 4 percent that most polls were predicting...
View attachment 223724
the entire PV delta was in NY and Cal and even in those states it came down to a few counties. Yes, Clinton won those two blue states, but she lost the EC by a large margin. Do we really want a few counties in NY and Cal picking our presidents? Do we really want 48 states to have no voice in it?
I am not advocating for the PV to choose the election, I merely pointed out that the polls were not a wrong as the sheep have been told.
Historically speaking, Trump's win in the EC was not large at all. It was in the bottom 10% all time for margin of victory.
This past election came down to 3 states, Wi, MI and Penn. Trump won those 3 states by less than a percentage point combined
the polls were not predicting the PV, they were predicting who would win the election, and they were wrong or they were lying. why do you have so much trouble understanding that?
Remodeling Maidiac
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #44
Hes a liberal that's why
Yeah, the polls in 2016 were just terrible...Clinton only won the popular vote (which is what polls predict) by 2.4%, not the 2 to 4 percent that most polls were predicting...
View attachment 223724
the entire PV delta was in NY and Cal and even in those states it came down to a few counties. Yes, Clinton won those two blue states, but she lost the EC by a large margin. Do we really want a few counties in NY and Cal picking our presidents? Do we really want 48 states to have no voice in it?
I am not advocating for the PV to choose the election, I merely pointed out that the polls were not a wrong as the sheep have been told.
Historically speaking, Trump's win in the EC was not large at all. It was in the bottom 10% all time for margin of victory.
This past election came down to 3 states, Wi, MI and Penn. Trump won those 3 states by less than a percentage point combined
the polls were not predicting the PV, they were predicting who would win the election, and they were wrong or they were lying. why do you have so much trouble understanding that?
H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
Yeah, the polls in 2016 were just terrible...Clinton only won the popular vote (which is what polls predict) by 2.4%, not the 2 to 4 percent that most polls were predicting...
View attachment 223724
the entire PV delta was in NY and Cal and even in those states it came down to a few counties. Yes, Clinton won those two blue states, but she lost the EC by a large margin. Do we really want a few counties in NY and Cal picking our presidents? Do we really want 48 states to have no voice in it?
I am not advocating for the PV to choose the election, I merely pointed out that the polls were not a wrong as the sheep have been told.
Historically speaking, Trump's win in the EC was not large at all. It was in the bottom 10% all time for margin of victory.
This past election came down to 3 states, Wi, MI and Penn. Trump won those 3 states by less than a percentage point combined
the polls were not predicting the PV, they were predicting who would win the election, and they were wrong or they were lying. why do you have so much trouble understanding that?
The only thing the polls can predict is the PV since the polls in question are national polls. They never claimed to be able to predict the EC, but most of the time the EC follows the PV.
Why is this so hard to you to understand?
H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
Hes a liberal that's why
Yeah, the polls in 2016 were just terrible...Clinton only won the popular vote (which is what polls predict) by 2.4%, not the 2 to 4 percent that most polls were predicting...
View attachment 223724
the entire PV delta was in NY and Cal and even in those states it came down to a few counties. Yes, Clinton won those two blue states, but she lost the EC by a large margin. Do we really want a few counties in NY and Cal picking our presidents? Do we really want 48 states to have no voice in it?
I am not advocating for the PV to choose the election, I merely pointed out that the polls were not a wrong as the sheep have been told.
Historically speaking, Trump's win in the EC was not large at all. It was in the bottom 10% all time for margin of victory.
This past election came down to 3 states, Wi, MI and Penn. Trump won those 3 states by less than a percentage point combined
the polls were not predicting the PV, they were predicting who would win the election, and they were wrong or they were lying. why do you have so much trouble understanding that?
ha, coming from a big government statist like you that is damn funny!
H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
Yeah, the polls in 2016 were just terrible...Clinton only won the popular vote (which is what polls predict) by 2.4%, not the 2 to 4 percent that most polls were predicting...
View attachment 223724
Do you truly believe that crap?
It is not a matter of belief, facts do not need belief.
I posted the final polls numbers from the day before the election, are you claiming the numbers I posted were made up?
Redfish
Diamond Member
This past election came down to 3 states, Wi, MI and Penn. Trump won those 3 states by less than a percentage point combined
Yeah, the polls in 2016 were just terrible...Clinton only won the popular vote (which is what polls predict) by 2.4%, not the 2 to 4 percent that most polls were predicting...
View attachment 223724
the entire PV delta was in NY and Cal and even in those states it came down to a few counties. Yes, Clinton won those two blue states, but she lost the EC by a large margin. Do we really want a few counties in NY and Cal picking our presidents? Do we really want 48 states to have no voice in it?
I am not advocating for the PV to choose the election, I merely pointed out that the polls were not a wrong as the sheep have been told.
Historically speaking, Trump's win in the EC was not large at all. It was in the bottom 10% all time for margin of victory.
BS, they were predicting who would win the election and become president, that outcome is determined by the EC not the PV
the polls were not predicting the PV, they were predicting who would win the election, and they were wrong or they were lying. why do you have so much trouble understanding that?
The only thing the polls can predict is the PV since the polls in question are national polls. They never claimed to be able to predict the EC, but most of the time the EC follows the PV.
Why is this so hard to you to understand?
Yeah, the polls in 2016 were just terrible...Clinton only won the popular vote (which is what polls predict) by 2.4%, not the 2 to 4 percent that most polls were predicting...
View attachment 223724
the entire PV delta was in NY and Cal and even in those states it came down to a few counties. Yes, Clinton won those two blue states, but she lost the EC by a large margin. Do we really want a few counties in NY and Cal picking our presidents? Do we really want 48 states to have no voice in it?
I am not advocating for the PV to choose the election, I merely pointed out that the polls were not a wrong as the sheep have been told.
Historically speaking, Trump's win in the EC was not large at all. It was in the bottom 10% all time for margin of victory.
This past election came down to 3 states, Wi, MI and Penn. Trump won those 3 states by less than a percentage point combined
the polls were not predicting the PV, they were predicting who would win the election, and they were wrong or they were lying. why do you have so much trouble understanding that?
The only thing the polls can predict is the PV since the polls in question are national polls. They never claimed to be able to predict the EC, but most of the time the EC follows the PV.
Why is this so hard to you to understand?
when a poll says that Hillary has a 97% chance of becoming president is it predicting the PV or the EC? are you really as ignorant as you appear to be?
when a poll says that Trump has no path to 270 EC votes is it predicting the PV or the EC?
Crepitus
Diamond Member
- Mar 28, 2018
- 105,434
- 156,268
- 3,615
H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
Links please.
Crepitus
Diamond Member
- Mar 28, 2018
- 105,434
- 156,268
- 3,615
That's because they are thruths and facts. You guys should get some, they are all the rage these days.
Yeah, the polls in 2016 were just terrible...Clinton only won the popular vote (which is what polls predict) by 2.4%, not the 2 to 4 percent that most polls were predicting...
View attachment 223724
Haha..once again GG posts just like a filthy LefTard would...But, but, but...he’s only telling the truth...haha
Why yes, thank you for recognizing all I did was report the truth and facts.
We know, we know....it’s just awfully bizarre...somehow, someway you ALWAYS seem to be posting the same “truth and facts” that all our resident LibTardians post...the narrative you hope to induce with your noble truths always seems to align with those same narratives of the filthy Left....weird huh? Ironic huh?
leftwinger
Diamond Member
If memory serves me well......everyone of GatorMacs' MSM outlets were predicting 400+ EV win for their candidate (Beast).
Like Jake, they said Trump had no chance (daily). They do this to make Trump voters give up and stay home alllowing leftist commmee MacGator to continue the con game. But they are smarter than the extremist lol!
Like Jake, they said Trump had no chance (daily). They do this to make Trump voters give up and stay home alllowing leftist commmee MacGator to continue the con game. But they are smarter than the extremist lol!
Norman
Diamond Member
- Sep 24, 2010
- 31,254
- 15,235
- 1,590
With the models these guys are pulling out their asses, anything is possible.
They probably get their news from the same source.
Redfish
Diamond Member
I am not here to be your teacher, everyone knows about those polls.
better quit here gator, you are embarrassing yourself.
H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
hmmmm...that must have been why I said "most polls".
I guess that word "most" is a bit too complicated for you.
H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
In other words you are just making shit up and cannot support a single thing you say.
Well, some things never change I suppose.
H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
My candidate was Johnson, so you are mistaken there.
And instead of going from "memory" how about a link or two to back up what you are peddling?
Norman
Diamond Member
- Sep 24, 2010
- 31,254
- 15,235
- 1,590
It's you who have the problem with the concept. There is only one poll with 2%. Did you not have a degree in statistics?
In any case that comment was posted accidentally. Only the bottom of it was supposed to be posted.
Redfish
Diamond Member
I don't feel the need to post cites for things that are common knowledge, sorry if the facts don't support your left wing rhetoric.
BTW, Hillary will NEVER be president and will always be a criminal who should be in a jail cell.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
scientist programing brain cells like a biological computer!- Started by Slyhunter
- Replies: 1
-
Trump slammed for wearing golf hat at slain soldiers dignified transfer ceremony.- Started by ElmerMudd
- Replies: 8
-
-
