I thought we were told we just needed three days for the professionals at the FBI to look into it. I guess that was before it really started falling apart. You demanded it, you got it, and now you're deciding you don't want it.
Nobody said just three days.
You guys want to limit it because if you do it right, you'll probably find out a lot of stuff about the angry drunk you want to put on the court.
Like that arrest he had in New Haven for a bar fight.
I see the new narrative is taking hold. Since the sexual assault accusation is falling apart (your mistake was immediately screaming rape, even though he wasn't accused of it), now you want to focus on drinking. Any evidence that Kav is in fact today a drunk? I mean, besides random internet keyboard jockeys mindlessly repeating it.
Nobody said it was falling apart, but the fact he pretty much admitted to being an angry drunk is disqualifying in and of itself... and we can prove that without an investigation.
And now, the 2 door story is falling apart....remember when she said the trauma was so deep that she needed 2 front doors on her home....and the fight with her husband about it sent them to counseling, where she then talked about the attack?
Trivial and unimportant. You really should stick to reporting the one gun crime in Britain while ignoring the hundreds that happen here.
The accusers' stories are not holding up, so naturally that's supposed to make us believe them even more.