Jack-booted, mask wearing thugs, clad in black, have been running roughshod all over our freedoms. People have come under attack from the left in all quarters. If you attempt to stand up for conservative values, you become a target. We are being thrown out of our job, attacked using violence, and yanked in front of activist judges and made to answer for our words or our thoughts. On the other side of the coin, praise is heaped on anyone who throws away their principles and jumps on the progressive bandwagon. The benefits are many if you resist. If you attempt to stand by what you believe, you get crushed. It's time to give it back to these degenerates.
Big, satisfied smiles: Washington state attorney general Bob Ferguson and staff enjoy
having thwarted a Trump immigration order in federal court, February 9. Photo credit: Elaine Thompson / AP
Fake Law!
The problem with voting into office a criminal like Obama is the fact that he stacked the bench with activists judges that are practicing what is becoming known as "Fake Law". They rule not on the letter of the law but thru their own prejudices and preconceived notions of what the law should be. Liberals go judge shopping for friendly judges that will rule for them. The 9th Circus Court of Appeals is stacked full of judges that wouldn't know the law if it kicked them in the crotch, and have no intention of following it even if they did know.
Why not look for judges that actually apply the law as written and sue the crap out of these progressives. Give them a taste of their own medicine.
These activists are having a great time going around crushing people all over America that don't live the way they want them to live. They enjoy targeting God, or anything they're against, and suing people in an attempt to silence free-speech and the freedom to practice religion. They actually feel that the constitution gives them the right to remove what offends them the most from our lives.
Most recently, the left as taken this even further. They've been busy trying to prevent any conservative ideas from being voiced on college campuses. In some places in California you can get an ass whipping for not agreeing that only black lives matter. Conservatives like Milo and Ann Coulter have been threatened with violence and murder if they dare to show up when invited. So much for the media fabricated image of Tea Party violence.
Links
Ann Coulter's backers at UC Berkeley file lawsuit
Milo Sues Simon And Schuster For $10 Million, Announces Independent Book Publication
Big, satisfied smiles: Washington state attorney general Bob Ferguson and staff enjoy
having thwarted a Trump immigration order in federal court, February 9. Photo credit: Elaine Thompson / AP
Fake Law!
"Something ugly is happening to the First Amendment. It is being contorted to enable judges to protest Donald Trump's presidency. The perennial impulse of judges to manipulate the law to achieve morally and politically desirable ends has only been exacerbated by the felt necessity to "resist" Trump. The result: Legal tests concerning the freedoms of speech and religion that in some cases were already highly dubious are being further deformed and twisted.
Welcome to the rise of fake law. Just as fake news spreads ideologically motivated misinformation with a newsy veneer, fake law brings us judicial posturing, virtue signaling, and opinionating masquerading as jurisprudence. And just as fake news augurs the end of authoritative reporting, fake law portends the diminution of law's legitimacy and the warping of judges' self-understanding of their constitutional role.
Those who try to police the relentlessly transformational projects of constitutional progressives had much to dread from the Obama administration, an inveterate ally of the legal left that did what it could to graft the aspirations of progressives onto the Constitution. But Trump's presidency may be even worse, because too many judges now feel called to "resist" Trump and all his works—no matter the cost to the law's authority and to the integrity of the judicial role.
In one recent deformation, Trump was sued for incitement to riot and assault and battery when, at a campaign rally before he became president, he said "Get 'em out of here" in response to protesters in the audience. Several of these protesters were subsequently pushed and struck by others in the crowd. A Kentucky federal district judge ruled that the case against Trump could proceed because "Get 'em out of here" could reasonably be interpreted as an exhortation to attack the protesters.
The most astonishing part is the court's conclusion that the statement is not protected by the speech clause of the First Amendment because it is plausible to think Trump was inciting a riot. Though the court cites the highly speech-protective test from Brandenburg v. Ohio, in which the Supreme Court held that the freedom of speech does not permit the government "to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action," it mangles it. What part of "Get 'em out of here" could plausibly be interpreted as advocating illegal activity, rather than a call for the assistance of security officers? Where is the explicit advocacy of illegality?"
Welcome to the rise of fake law. Just as fake news spreads ideologically motivated misinformation with a newsy veneer, fake law brings us judicial posturing, virtue signaling, and opinionating masquerading as jurisprudence. And just as fake news augurs the end of authoritative reporting, fake law portends the diminution of law's legitimacy and the warping of judges' self-understanding of their constitutional role.
Those who try to police the relentlessly transformational projects of constitutional progressives had much to dread from the Obama administration, an inveterate ally of the legal left that did what it could to graft the aspirations of progressives onto the Constitution. But Trump's presidency may be even worse, because too many judges now feel called to "resist" Trump and all his works—no matter the cost to the law's authority and to the integrity of the judicial role.
In one recent deformation, Trump was sued for incitement to riot and assault and battery when, at a campaign rally before he became president, he said "Get 'em out of here" in response to protesters in the audience. Several of these protesters were subsequently pushed and struck by others in the crowd. A Kentucky federal district judge ruled that the case against Trump could proceed because "Get 'em out of here" could reasonably be interpreted as an exhortation to attack the protesters.
The most astonishing part is the court's conclusion that the statement is not protected by the speech clause of the First Amendment because it is plausible to think Trump was inciting a riot. Though the court cites the highly speech-protective test from Brandenburg v. Ohio, in which the Supreme Court held that the freedom of speech does not permit the government "to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action," it mangles it. What part of "Get 'em out of here" could plausibly be interpreted as advocating illegal activity, rather than a call for the assistance of security officers? Where is the explicit advocacy of illegality?"
The problem with voting into office a criminal like Obama is the fact that he stacked the bench with activists judges that are practicing what is becoming known as "Fake Law". They rule not on the letter of the law but thru their own prejudices and preconceived notions of what the law should be. Liberals go judge shopping for friendly judges that will rule for them. The 9th Circus Court of Appeals is stacked full of judges that wouldn't know the law if it kicked them in the crotch, and have no intention of following it even if they did know.
Why not look for judges that actually apply the law as written and sue the crap out of these progressives. Give them a taste of their own medicine.
These activists are having a great time going around crushing people all over America that don't live the way they want them to live. They enjoy targeting God, or anything they're against, and suing people in an attempt to silence free-speech and the freedom to practice religion. They actually feel that the constitution gives them the right to remove what offends them the most from our lives.
Most recently, the left as taken this even further. They've been busy trying to prevent any conservative ideas from being voiced on college campuses. In some places in California you can get an ass whipping for not agreeing that only black lives matter. Conservatives like Milo and Ann Coulter have been threatened with violence and murder if they dare to show up when invited. So much for the media fabricated image of Tea Party violence.
Links
Ann Coulter's backers at UC Berkeley file lawsuit
Milo Sues Simon And Schuster For $10 Million, Announces Independent Book Publication
