If Trump were innocent , he would be an open book for Mueller

[FA_Q2]

Not sure why you would think such a thing.

If you are guilty the last thing you want to do is work with the person who's ONLY job is to find evidence to convict you of a crime. Conversely, if you are innocent, the last thing you want to do is work with the person who's ONLY job is to find evidence to convict you of a crime. Muller's job is the same either way and your best legal action remains the same as well.

One of the common misconceptions here is that Muller is actually supposed to get to the truth of the matter when that really is not what he is there to do. He is there to kind as much evidence as possible on any guilty parties within Trump's campaign. It is up to the judges, juries and in Trumps case the legislator to determine actual guilt or innocence.

That is not a misconception, their only job is to find the truth....they look and gather both the evidence of innocence and the evidence of guilt....That is their sworn duty....

That is not what prosecutors do. They find evidence. The truth is found in the courts.

But it doesn't always go to court.... the investigator's job is to find the evidence, the truth.....the prosecutor/grand jury DECIDES if there is enough evidence to prosecute a crime, with the likelihood of winning.... if there is NOT enough evidence showing crimes committed, then it does not even go to court at all....

Again, as you seem to not understand this, the investigator finds evidence BUT that does not equate to 'truth' and that is simply a fact. Period.

As you stated, the grand jury - if there is one - decides if that evidence is enough to justify a court looking at the case to determine the truth. An investigators sole job is gathering evidence. If that is enough to establish the truth in a courtroom another matter and not what they do.

 

[mikegriffith1]

If Trump's ties to Russia are a "nothing burger" like he says

Why doesn't he just explain to the American people what all those meetings with Russia were about?

"All those meetings"?! WHAT "all those meetings"?! You mean like Jeff Sessions' "meeting" with a Russian diplomat after a speech where the diplomat came up to him after the speech and chatted with him for a few minutes? Yes, that's one of the "meetings" that Dems are citing.

You mean like the meeting that Sessions had in his office with a Russian diplomat while Sessions was chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee?! Sessions met with many diplomats in that capacity. That meeting had nothing to do with the election--the subject never arose. But, yes, this is another one of the "meetings" that Dems are citing as "evidence" of "collusion."

Meanwhile, you guys ignore the real evidence of genuine collusion in the Fusion GPS smear dossier on Trump. Hillary paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for that dossier, but, oh, she supposedly didn't know that the money was being used for that! Yeah, right! Well, someone pretty high up in her campaign had to know what it was being used for.

 

[eagle1462010]

Donna Brazile Leaves CNN After Leaks Reveal Campaign Collusion

On 31 October 2016, Democratic National Committee (DNC) interim chair Donna Brazile was fired from her position as a political commentator at CNN over e-mail leaks suggesting she had improperly supplied Hillary Clinton’s campaign with advance knowledge of questions to be posed to her during Democratic campaign events hosted by the news network.

According to Politico, CNN released a statement asserting the network had “accepted” Brazile’s resignation on 14 October 2016. CNN stated that they were “completely uncomfortable” with the content of e-mails seemingly showing she had obtained information in advance about questions to be posed at CNN town hall and debate events:

Yeah old news..we all know that..go and try to distract on another thread..

.

The real criminals are quoted by my memes.........but of course they can do no wrong in your eyes.............and the only REASON TRUMP WON was ..............................................wait for it.......................

THE RUSSIANS DID IT................LOL

You guys are a pathetic bunch of losers.............lmao