Little-Acorn
Gold Member
The 420-pound gorilla was dragging the kid around the cage and through the water like he was a rag doll. Zoo officials decided the gorilla was a definite threat to the kid's life, so they shot and killed the gorilla to save the child.
And now, incredibly, some moonbats are insisting the child wasn't in any danger, and the zoo officials should have left the gorilla alive to continue what it was doing.
Nobody can be SURE the gorilla would injure or kill the child. Likewise, nobody can be SURE the gorilla definitely would not. There was a very real chance that it would.
If that chance had been realized, and the gorilla killed the child (either accidentally or intentionally) after officials had decided not to shoot the gorilla.....
.....would the fruitcakes currently protesting the gorilla's death, be praising the zoo officials for not shooting the gorilla?
And now, incredibly, some moonbats are insisting the child wasn't in any danger, and the zoo officials should have left the gorilla alive to continue what it was doing.
Nobody can be SURE the gorilla would injure or kill the child. Likewise, nobody can be SURE the gorilla definitely would not. There was a very real chance that it would.
If that chance had been realized, and the gorilla killed the child (either accidentally or intentionally) after officials had decided not to shoot the gorilla.....
.....would the fruitcakes currently protesting the gorilla's death, be praising the zoo officials for not shooting the gorilla?