If Mueller would have 'had the goods' on Trump he would have indicted him.

[Billy_Bob]

Outright lie since Mueller himself said No American Colluded with Russia or committed any crimes. Rosenstein said this also.

Why do you lie?

Please list the crimes Mueller stated Trump Committed.

He did NOT.

NO EVIDENCE
NO CRIME
NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION
NO OBSTRUCTION...

THUS...

NO INDICTMENTS FOR COLLUSION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR COLLUSION
NO INDICTMENTS FOR OBSTRUCTION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR OBSTRUCTION.

'Nuff time wasted.

'Nuff said.

NEXT!

Nope. Mueller operated under the idea that a sitting president cannot be indicted. That is why he handed Trumpian crimes to the other investigators.He gave info to 14 groups who are doing the work now.

They ignore the blanket covering NO crimes committed....

 

[whitehall]

The President can't be indicted. That having been said, how freaking hard is it to understand that a two year investigation with over 3,000 subpoenas and over 500 witnesses not to mention a couple of search warrant raids determined that there was never any evidence of collusion?

 

[The Original Tree]

For people that live in Fantasy Land Facts Don’t Matter!

Fairies are Real!

The President can't be indicted. That having been said, how freaking hard is it to understand that a two year investigation with over 3,000 subpoenas and over 500 witnesses not to mention a couple of search warrant raids determined that there was never any evidence of collusion?

 

[bodecea]

If Mueller had the goods on Trump AND HIS TEAM he would have indicted THEM on collusion and Obstruction.

NOT ONE OF THEM were indicted for Russian Collusion and / or obstruction. IN FACT, Mueller declared NO EVIDENCE, NO CRIME, NO COLLUSION....NONE!

Libs and snowflakes declared our President was / is a 'traitor'...said his team were traitors.
-- Mueller's report just proved YOU WERE ... ARE ... ALL WRONG!

Evidence confined to show you ALL have and continue to defend the REAL traitors and criminals.

More caps....you need more caps.

 

[Billy_Bob]

If Mueller had the goods on Trump AND HIS TEAM he would have indicted THEM on collusion and Obstruction.

NOT ONE OF THEM were indicted for Russian Collusion and / or obstruction. IN FACT, Mueller declared NO EVIDENCE, NO CRIME, NO COLLUSION....NONE!

Libs and snowflakes declared our President was / is a 'traitor'...said his team were traitors.
-- Mueller's report just proved YOU WERE ... ARE ... ALL WRONG!

Evidence confined to show you ALL have and continue to defend the REAL traitors and criminals.

More caps....you need more caps.

I couldn't find the grammar police logo... this will do... When you have nothing constructive to add to the debate....Deflect from the fact no evidence exists for your fantasy crimes......

 

[Weatherman2020]

He did NOT.

NO EVIDENCE
NO CRIME
NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION
NO OBSTRUCTION...

THUS...

NO INDICTMENTS FOR COLLUSION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR COLLUSION
NO INDICTMENTS FOR OBSTRUCTION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR OBSTRUCTION.

'Nuff time wasted.

'Nuff said.

NEXT!

A central reason for the Mueller team’s failure to make that judgment, despite the overwhelming evidence of obstruction they have reported, is two opinions rendered by the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) — one from 1973 and another from 2000 — which say that the indictment of an incumbent President is “impermissible.” Mueller concluded that as an operative of the Department of Justice (DOJ), he was bound to follow that guideline, and he lateralled the decision to Congress.

There is disagreement on this issue of whether a sitting president can be indicted. But it was Mueller's prerogative to use the OLC opinion to decline indictment. Lack of evidence doesnt even enter into the equation. There is boatloads of it.

And yet Pelosi REFUSES to impeach. YOUR party leader is letting the treasonous orange man walk free.

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?

Make alot of noise about it. Elizabeth Warren did it. Give her time to get the unredacted report.
If Mueller testifies, it'll make Comey Day look like a highschool football game.

Why in the hell do you moonbats keep saying you need the redacted report? You keep saying the report says he’s guilty, SO STOP PROTECTING TRUMP SND IMPEACH HIM OR SHUT UP.

 

[Siete]

The President can't be indicted. That having been said, how freaking hard is it to understand that a two year investigation with over 3,000 subpoenas and over 500 witnesses not to mention a couple of search warrant raids determined that there was never any evidence of collusion?

its apparent you and the rest of the board Russians dont have the mental capacity to process the entire scope of the investigation.

 

[Siete]

He did NOT.

NO EVIDENCE
NO CRIME
NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION
NO OBSTRUCTION...

THUS...

NO INDICTMENTS FOR COLLUSION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR COLLUSION
NO INDICTMENTS FOR OBSTRUCTION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR OBSTRUCTION.

'Nuff time wasted.

'Nuff said.

NEXT!

A central reason for the Mueller team’s failure to make that judgment, despite the overwhelming evidence of obstruction they have reported, is two opinions rendered by the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) — one from 1973 and another from 2000 — which say that the indictment of an incumbent President is “impermissible.” Mueller concluded that as an operative of the Department of Justice (DOJ), he was bound to follow that guideline, and he lateralled the decision to Congress.

There is disagreement on this issue of whether a sitting president can be indicted. But it was Mueller's prerogative to use the OLC opinion to decline indictment. Lack of evidence doesnt even enter into the equation. There is boatloads of it.

And yet Pelosi REFUSES to impeach. YOUR party leader is letting the treasonous orange man walk free.

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?

Make alot of noise about it. Elizabeth Warren did it. Give her time to get the unredacted report.
If Mueller testifies, it'll make Comey Day look like a highschool football game.

Why in the hell do you moonbats keep saying you need the redacted report? You keep saying the report says he’s guilty, SO STOP PROTECTING TRUMP SND IMPEACH HIM OR SHUT UP.

and yet another do it or shut up hits the room -

gee, I wonder how long it would take to impeach Trump ?

 

[Billy_Bob]

He did NOT.

NO EVIDENCE
NO CRIME
NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION
NO OBSTRUCTION...

THUS...

NO INDICTMENTS FOR COLLUSION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR COLLUSION
NO INDICTMENTS FOR OBSTRUCTION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR OBSTRUCTION.

'Nuff time wasted.

'Nuff said.

NEXT!

A central reason for the Mueller team’s failure to make that judgment, despite the overwhelming evidence of obstruction they have reported, is two opinions rendered by the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) — one from 1973 and another from 2000 — which say that the indictment of an incumbent President is “impermissible.” Mueller concluded that as an operative of the Department of Justice (DOJ), he was bound to follow that guideline, and he lateralled the decision to Congress.

There is disagreement on this issue of whether a sitting president can be indicted. But it was Mueller's prerogative to use the OLC opinion to decline indictment. Lack of evidence doesnt even enter into the equation. There is boatloads of it.

And yet Pelosi REFUSES to impeach. YOUR party leader is letting the treasonous orange man walk free.

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?

Make alot of noise about it. Elizabeth Warren did it. Give her time to get the unredacted report.
If Mueller testifies, it'll make Comey Day look like a highschool football game.

Why in the hell do you moonbats keep saying you need the redacted report? You keep saying the report says he’s guilty, SO STOP PROTECTING TRUMP SND IMPEACH HIM OR SHUT UP.

Schiff has been screaming for two damn years he has positive proof.... Time for these liars to put up or shut up... I hope Trump sues them for defamation and slander... Keep it up big libs and your going to find out how that feels.

 

[Weatherman2020]

The President can't be indicted. That having been said, how freaking hard is it to understand that a two year investigation with over 3,000 subpoenas and over 500 witnesses not to mention a couple of search warrant raids determined that there was never any evidence of collusion?

its apparent you and the rest of the board Russians dont have the mental capacity to process the entire scope of the investigation.

Why is YOUR party leader PELOSI refusing to bring the TREASONOUS orange man to JUSTICE?

YOUR PARTY LEADER.

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?

 

[Daryl Hunt]

He did NOT.

NO EVIDENCE
NO CRIME
NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION
NO OBSTRUCTION...

THUS...

NO INDICTMENTS FOR COLLUSION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR COLLUSION
NO INDICTMENTS FOR OBSTRUCTION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR OBSTRUCTION.

'Nuff time wasted.

'Nuff said.

NEXT!

A central reason for the Mueller team’s failure to make that judgment, despite the overwhelming evidence of obstruction they have reported, is two opinions rendered by the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) — one from 1973 and another from 2000 — which say that the indictment of an incumbent President is “impermissible.” Mueller concluded that as an operative of the Department of Justice (DOJ), he was bound to follow that guideline, and he lateralled the decision to Congress.

There is disagreement on this issue of whether a sitting president can be indicted. But it was Mueller's prerogative to use the OLC opinion to decline indictment. Lack of evidence doesnt even enter into the equation. There is boatloads of it.

And yet Pelosi REFUSES to impeach. YOUR party leader is letting the treasonous orange man walk free.

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?

Make alot of noise about it. Elizabeth Warren did it. Give her time to get the unredacted report.
If Mueller testifies, it'll make Comey Day look like a highschool football game.

Why in the hell do you moonbats keep saying you need the redacted report? You keep saying the report says he’s guilty, SO STOP PROTECTING TRUMP SND IMPEACH HIM OR SHUT UP.

We don't want him impeached. This is just too much fun. We need to keep him around to torture for the next 20 months or so and watch all of you strumpets heads explode over and over. We'll take pictures for facebook.

 

[Weatherman2020]

He did NOT.

NO EVIDENCE
NO CRIME
NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION
NO OBSTRUCTION...

THUS...

NO INDICTMENTS FOR COLLUSION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR COLLUSION
NO INDICTMENTS FOR OBSTRUCTION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR OBSTRUCTION.

'Nuff time wasted.

'Nuff said.

NEXT!

A central reason for the Mueller team’s failure to make that judgment, despite the overwhelming evidence of obstruction they have reported, is two opinions rendered by the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) — one from 1973 and another from 2000 — which say that the indictment of an incumbent President is “impermissible.” Mueller concluded that as an operative of the Department of Justice (DOJ), he was bound to follow that guideline, and he lateralled the decision to Congress.

There is disagreement on this issue of whether a sitting president can be indicted. But it was Mueller's prerogative to use the OLC opinion to decline indictment. Lack of evidence doesnt even enter into the equation. There is boatloads of it.

And yet Pelosi REFUSES to impeach. YOUR party leader is letting the treasonous orange man walk free.

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?

Make alot of noise about it. Elizabeth Warren did it. Give her time to get the unredacted report.
If Mueller testifies, it'll make Comey Day look like a highschool football game.

Why in the hell do you moonbats keep saying you need the redacted report? You keep saying the report says he’s guilty, SO STOP PROTECTING TRUMP SND IMPEACH HIM OR SHUT UP.

We don't want him impeached. This is just too much fun. We need to keep him around to torture for the next 20 months or so and watch all of you strumpets heads explode over and over. We'll take pictures for facebook.

We don't want him impeached.

Oh, so you’ve been lying and spewing bullshit for two years.

Got it.

 

[Sandy Shanks]

He did NOT.

NO EVIDENCE
NO CRIME
NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION
NO OBSTRUCTION...

THUS...

NO INDICTMENTS FOR COLLUSION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR COLLUSION
NO INDICTMENTS FOR OBSTRUCTION
NO CONVICTIONS FOR OBSTRUCTION.

'Nuff time wasted.

'Nuff said.

NEXT!

You are not very well informed. Mueller could not indict Trump. The DOJ could not in indict Trump.

Why? DOJ rules forbid indicting a sitting President. You didn't know that? Remarkable. My sixth grade neighbor knew that much.

 

[Sandy Shanks]

As for impeachment, speaking from the standpoint of an opponent to Trump, it would be extremely foolish of the Democratic Party to impeach Trump. I watched Fox today, and who did they showcase besides Trump? The euphemistically called Trump Network focused on Senator and Presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren and her call for impeachment.

Trump Republicans talk more about impeachment than the Democrats. Trump Republicans want the Democrats to impeach Trump. Warren, AOC, Omar, and Tlaib, Democratic women who favor impeachment, are doing more damage to the Democratic Party than Trump ever could. Their rhetoric is designed to give Trump four more years.

What is the purpose here? Is it impeachment? No. Is it removing Trump from the Oval Office? YES!

Impeachment will not do that. Unless Trump murders someone, no way will Trump Republicans vote to convict Trump. Notice the total silence from the GOP leadership regarding the damaging and embarrassing evidence in the redacted version of the Mueller Report. Nothing from McConnell or Graham. They don't care. All they care about is re-electing Trump. Convicting Trump on impeachment charges won't do that.

In addition, the Democratic Party will be blamed for the shame of a failed impeachment. In addition, if the House impeaches, all that will be accomplished in the next two years is impeachment proceedings and trial in the Senate. Everything else will grind to a halt.

Which is why the Democratic leadership -- Pelosi, Hoyer, Schumer, Nadler and others -- are saying, as things stand now, there will be no impeachment proceeding. According to the leadership, there will be impeachment only if there is overwhelming, bipartisan grounds for doing so.

Why? First, the Democratic Party will be blamed for wasting taxpayer dollars and enormous time on the failed attempt, and impeachment assuredly would fail. Second, Trump would become a martyr, a victim of Democratic overreach. Three, the Democrats want to run against a crippled candidate in 2020, not a martyr. Investigations in the House will continue, including examining the unredacted version of the Mueller Report along with the underlying evidence.

What is amazing to me is, why in the hell can't Warren, a freaking Senator, see that. Amazing, positively amazing. The three young things, AOC, Omar, and Tlaib can be excused for their inexperience and incredible naïveté, but a Senator. Incredible.

As for Trump getting off light, he will suffer the indignity of a sitting President being defeated. Also, the DOJ has a rule that a sitting President can't be indicted. There are a number of crimes Trump could be charged with after leaving office.

 

[dudmuck]

Too Bad it’s all opinion and he just didn’t have the balls to indict The President for
Crimes Mueller couldn’t find.

Let’s be honest here. Mueller was bullying everyone he was interviewing. PreDawn raids etc. charging people with petty process crimes when Mueller was able to trip someone up.

But he cannot find a single thing after 2,500
Subpoenas, 500 Interrogations, and $40 Million Dollars and armed with a completely biasedinvestigation team in which half had to be fired and came under criminal investigation for attempting a bloodless COUP.

Yet he cannot find a single thing to charge The President with?

It’s his job to Indict People, even on stupid shit he comes across that have nothing at all to do with his original mandate.

I might add, The American Public still has not been shown documentary us on Mueller’s Investigative Mandate and scope of Investigation.

And to make matters worse he not only Stated “No Collusion” after 400 pages of garbage investigative work, he totally wimps out, goes yellow and states...I can’t find Obstruction...maybe Congress can?

That is a WTF moment that tells everyone this was nothing but a political we h hunt that failed due to the difficulty of trying to frame an innocent man.

A central reason for the Mueller team’s failure to make that judgment, despite the overwhelming evidence of obstruction they have reported, is two opinions rendered by the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) — one from 1973 and another from 2000 — which say that the indictment of an incumbent President is “impermissible.” Mueller concluded that as an operative of the Department of Justice (DOJ), he was bound to follow that guideline, and he lateralled the decision to Congress.

There is disagreement on this issue of whether a sitting president can be indicted. But it was Mueller's prerogative to use the OLC opinion to decline indictment. Lack of evidence doesnt even enter into the equation. There is boatloads of it.

There is no evidence of obstruction, moron. None.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's redacted final report explicitly chose not to decide if President Donald Trump had committed criminal obstruction of justice. But Mueller's detailed factual findings paints a damning portrait of a president repeatedly trying — sometimes successfully, and sometimes not — to hinder, if not derail, the investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Mueller's key findings
● Mueller rejects the argument that the president is shielded from obstruction laws.
●Trump, when told of appointment of special counsel Mueller, said: “This is the end of my presidency.”
● “Substantial evidence” supports Comey over Trump in account of Flynn meeting.
●Trump campaign attempted to obtain Hillary Clinton’s private emails.
● Campaign expected to benefit from stolen information released by the Russians.
● Mueller probe spawned 14 other investigations, including two unidentified cases that remain ongoing.
● Putin stepped up outreach to Trump after election.
● Special counsel team concluded Trump intended to obstruct probe in tweeting support for Manafort.
● Mueller appears to kick obstruction question to Congress.

And not one of those items shows intent to obstruct.. Just wow...

you didnt see the one about trump's manafort tweeting?

Ric Simmons, law professor, Ohio State University
After reading the full report, it is much harder to understand why Mueller determined that there was insufficient evidence to believe that the president was guilty of obstruction of justice. The primary reason seems to be lack of evidence that the president had a “corrupt intent.” But in reviewing the 10 episodes in which the president may have obstructed justice, the report concludes numerous times that there is “substantial evidence” that the president acted with the intent to impede ongoing criminal investigations, or that a “reasonable inference” is that the president acted with such an intent.

Furthermore, the report noted that the president refused to cooperate with the investigation with regard to answering questions on potential obstruction of justice charges, and that the Mueller team declined to issue a subpoena in order to pursue the issue. But if the question of the president’s intent was unresolved, and thus the question of whether the president was guilty of obstruction remained unresolved, a subpoena of the president would be a critical next step in the investigation.

While there may have been good reasons not to pursue a subpoena against the president, this omission in the investigation leaves open a very significant question regarding whether the president is guilty of obstruction charges.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

A central reason for the Mueller team’s failure to make that judgment, despite the overwhelming evidence of obstruction they have reported, is two opinions rendered by the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) — one from 1973 and another from 2000 — which say that the indictment of an incumbent President is “impermissible.” Mueller concluded that as an operative of the Department of Justice (DOJ), he was bound to follow that guideline, and he lateralled the decision to Congress.

There is disagreement on this issue of whether a sitting president can be indicted. But it was Mueller's prerogative to use the OLC opinion to decline indictment. Lack of evidence doesnt even enter into the equation. There is boatloads of it.

And yet Pelosi REFUSES to impeach. YOUR party leader is letting the treasonous orange man walk free.

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?

Make alot of noise about it. Elizabeth Warren did it. Give her time to get the unredacted report.
If Mueller testifies, it'll make Comey Day look like a highschool football game.

Why in the hell do you moonbats keep saying you need the redacted report? You keep saying the report says he’s guilty, SO STOP PROTECTING TRUMP SND IMPEACH HIM OR SHUT UP.

We don't want him impeached. This is just too much fun. We need to keep him around to torture for the next 20 months or so and watch all of you strumpets heads explode over and over. We'll take pictures for facebook.

We don't want him impeached.

Oh, so you’ve been lying and spewing bullshit for two years.

Got it.

And you know this how? You have no idea the damage that would do to the nation. Of course, like Trump, you don't give a rats ass about the Nation. You only think out Trump and the Strumpets. Screw America then.

 

[impuretrash]

And yet Pelosi REFUSES to impeach. YOUR party leader is letting the treasonous orange man walk free.

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?

Make alot of noise about it. Elizabeth Warren did it. Give her time to get the unredacted report.
If Mueller testifies, it'll make Comey Day look like a highschool football game.

Why in the hell do you moonbats keep saying you need the redacted report? You keep saying the report says he’s guilty, SO STOP PROTECTING TRUMP SND IMPEACH HIM OR SHUT UP.

We don't want him impeached. This is just too much fun. We need to keep him around to torture for the next 20 months or so and watch all of you strumpets heads explode over and over. We'll take pictures for facebook.

We don't want him impeached.

Oh, so you’ve been lying and spewing bullshit for two years.

Got it.

And you know this how? You have no idea the damage that would do to the nation. Of course, like Trump, you don't give a rats ass about the Nation. You only think out Trump and the Strumpets. Screw America then.

Now you're worried about damaging the nation? After two years of non-stop hysteria and demonization of all 60 million Americans who voted for Trump? Sorry but it's already broken beyond all repair.

 

[easyt65]

You are not very well informed. Mueller could not indict Trump. The DOJ could not in indict Trump.

Please quote for me from Mueller's report where it states Mueller states he did not indict the President for Obstruction because he was not allowed to...and provide the link to it.

The FACT is that you can NOT because Mueller never said this!

You snowflakes continue to LIE in order to justify the FACT that Mueller could not produce evidence of GUILT!

Mueller cites 10 incidents that show the President's frustration with the 2+ year 24/7 false allegations that could not undeniably / LEGALLY be substantiated.

Mueller cites incidents where Trump vents, rages, and WANTS to fire Mueller and end the illegal investigation that has been proven to have been initiated based on NO CRIME & NO EVIDENCE....

...BUT IT NEVER HAPPENED! Trump DID NOT fire Mueller, did NOT stop the investigation, did NOT attempt to destroy thousands of official subpoenaed Documents, did NOT Bleachbit his server, did NOT destroy multiple classified devices, did NOT refuse to cooperate.

Trump allowed it to continue, turned over thousands of documents, ordered the GOP to let it continue, and did not use Executive Privilege to hide embarrassing but NOT illegal acts.

Again, for the ignorant, reality-denying, desperate, Trump-hating snowflakes...

He may have wanted to fire Mueller and stop it, but he listened to his counsel. He let it continue.

He way have wanted to 'drink & drive', but someone 'took the keys' and convinced him not to. HE DID NOT BREAK THE LAW.

THINKING and WANTING to do something is NOT the same thing as DOING it.

Trump may have WANTED the illegal investigation / coup attempt to go away...but he did not DO anything to make it go awsy.

Hillary did not WANT to go to jail, so she DELETED 15,000+ official subpoenaed documents, used Bleachbit to try to wipe her hard drive, and illegally destroyed multiple classified personal devices.

You Trump-hating Hillary-defending pathetic desperate traitor-defenders are despicable. You sold your soul for partisan loyalty over truth, reality, justice...

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Make alot of noise about it. Elizabeth Warren did it. Give her time to get the unredacted report.
If Mueller testifies, it'll make Comey Day look like a highschool football game.

Why in the hell do you moonbats keep saying you need the redacted report? You keep saying the report says he’s guilty, SO STOP PROTECTING TRUMP SND IMPEACH HIM OR SHUT UP.

We don't want him impeached. This is just too much fun. We need to keep him around to torture for the next 20 months or so and watch all of you strumpets heads explode over and over. We'll take pictures for facebook.

We don't want him impeached.

Oh, so you’ve been lying and spewing bullshit for two years.

Got it.

And you know this how? You have no idea the damage that would do to the nation. Of course, like Trump, you don't give a rats ass about the Nation. You only think out Trump and the Strumpets. Screw America then.

Now you're worried about damaging the nation? After two years of non-stop hysteria and demonization of all 60 million Americans who voted for Trump? Sorry but it's already broken beyond all repair.

You started breaking it at least 10 years ago. And you finished the job in the last 2 years. You broke it, you were supposed to fix it. You just broke it even worse. Now, get out of the way and let someone else try and fix it and let them without your stupid meddling.

 

[easyt65]

This is another reason Barr needs to re-investigate Hillary, to Perp-walk her fat ass, to indict her for the THOUSANDS of criminal counts of REAL OBSTRUCTION, illegal possession of TS data, illegal handling of classified data and devices, illegal destruction of classified data and devices, illegal non-compliance with the FOIA, illegal non-compliance with the Federal Records Act, and for ESPIONAGE, then send her fat criminal ass to prison for the rest of her treasonous criminal life.

This would be the perfect TEACHING opportunity to educate ignorant, stupid f*ing snowflakes about the difference between THINKING about doing something illegal yet NOT doing it and actually COMMITTING thousands of counts of ACTUAL CRIMES!