If it were in Democrats' political interests, would they deny the results of an election?

[Whodatsaywhodat.]

Democrats have clearly been upset about Donald and Republicans doing it. But would Democrats do it themselves if there was something to be gained, like to help their chances in a subsequent election?

There is nothing a dirty Democrat wouldn't do to win . Look at 2020 . They cheated their little nuts off, and got away with it. Are you an American or are you a Democrat?

 

[SweetSue92]

??? Are you drinking tonight.

I have property in NV, AZ, UT, and NM. I claim voting residence in NV, where I live the majority of the year.

No. "I have property", and "claim voting residence" is not the same as LIVING

 

[crossbody]

This time the democrats are not going to deny the results because CNN has already let their democrats know that:

1. Trump is winning
2. Don't be surprised
3. They are going to call the victory for Trump

They have already prepared their viewers for this Trump victory. The win will be too big to rig. They will lay down and accept it.

 

[struth]

Democrats have clearly been upset about Donald and Republicans doing it. But would Democrats do it themselves if there was something to be gained, like to help their chances in a subsequent election?

They have every presidential election they lost this century

 

[crossbody]

Republicans will be in the White House for many years to come.

 

[westwall]

This time the democrats are not going to deny the results because CNN has already let their democrats know that:

1. Trump is winning
2. Don't be surprised
3. They are going to call the victory for Trump

They have already prepared their viewers for this Trump victory. The win will be too big to rig. They will lay down and accept it.

No, they won't. Not by a longshot.

 

[luiza]

Democrats have clearly been upset about Donald and Republicans doing it. But would Democrats do it themselves if there was something to be gained, like to help their chances in a subsequent election?

You fight to the death for the opportunity to make millions corruptly if you are smart enough to avoid being caught .

Show me an honest politician in power who is not bent and I will show you our pet Unicorn

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Harris is going to.win, don't worry. Now we have to pray that WWIII doesn't begin. The Cheneys will be ready for that moment while China hopes to bankrupt its rivals and remake the world order, whether their enemies know it or not.

Uh...ok. But you didn't answer my question. Would Democrats engage in election denialism if it was in their partisan interests to do so? You know, like how Republican candidates go around claiming the 2020 election was rigged and the Donald Trump really won, just so they can gain support of Donald Trump voters. Would Democrats do something like to help win an election?

 

[struth]

Uh...ok. But you didn't answer my question. Would Democrats engage in election denialism if it was in their partisan interests to do so? You know, like how Republican candidates go around claiming the 2020 election was rigged and the Donald Trump really won, just so they can gain support of Donald Trump voters. Would Democrats do something like to help win an election?

Yes, because you have, in every presidential election you lost this century..2000, 2004, 2016

It’s what you all do

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Yes, because you have, in every presidential election you lost this century..2000, 2004, 2016

It’s what you all do

I'm sorry, I can't understand your post. Between, what appears to be, a ridiculously false implication that I'm a Democrat, and the open ended sentences that don't seem to fully come to an end, I can't make heads or tails out of your broken English.

 

[Lesh]

Democrats have clearly been upset about Donald and Republicans doing it. But would Democrats do it themselves if there was something to be gained, like to help their chances in a subsequent election?

They would not.

Go look at 2000 for example

 

[DStar777]

Democrats have clearly been upset about Donald and Republicans doing it. But would Democrats do it themselves if there was something to be gained, like to help their chances in a subsequent election?

They already have:

 

[Mac1958]

Democrats have clearly been upset about Donald and Republicans doing it. But would Democrats do it themselves if there was something to be gained, like to help their chances in a subsequent election?

Interesting question.

We saw Hillary make her accusations and Stacey Abrams refuse to concede. But right now, at this moment, subject to change, the GQP is far more prone to believing and acting on conspiracy theories. Violently, administratively, politically.

But could it happen? Yeah, I think so. I've seen a lot of apocalyptic talk from Dems too in this cycle. Many are VERY emotionally invested in this. I guess the variable would be the quality and quantity of actual, provable evidence it would take for them to act. Unlike the GQP.

 

[berg80]

They have a looooooong history of it.

Prove it.

 

[Billiejeens]

Democrats have clearly been upset about Donald and Republicans doing it. But would Democrats do it themselves if there was something to be gained, like to help their chances in a subsequent election?

Any scenario that you ask that keeps Democrats in power, the answer is yes.

Power is all that they care about.

 

[westwall]

Prove it.

Plenty of examples posted in this very thread.

Go fetch, loser.

 

[berg80]

They have every time they've lost since al the whore. They've contested electoral votes, oh, lets not forget abrahams, she still claims she's the duly elected governor of GA.

.

Abrams' complaint had to due with the purge of the voter rolls ahead of the election which was controlled by her opponent.

Clinton's complaint had to due with trump soliciting and receiving help during the campaign from the leader of a foreign adversary. She conceded promptly.

After the Purge​

How a massive voter purge in Georgia affected the 2018 election​

How a massive voter purge in Georgia affected the 2018 election

State officials claimed that people removed from the voter rolls for inactivity had likely died or moved away. But an APM Reports investigation found tens of thousands who hadn't — and still wanted to vote.

www.apmreports.org

 

[berg80]

Plenty of examples posted in this very thread.

Go fetch, loser.

Give me one example that wasn't justified as trump's wasn't.

 

[struth]

I'm sorry, I can't understand your post. Between, what appears to be, a ridiculously false implication that I'm a Democrat, and the open ended sentences that don't seem to fully come to an end, I can't make heads or tails out of your broken English.

Are you suggesting the dembots haven’t questioned every presidential election they lost this century?

It appears you are from the OP, and frankly can’t understand that.

 

[berg80]

They have every presidential election they lost this century

Complained about what....exactly?