If Harris wins the debate on creepy Disney or improves her odds, there won't be another debate, if she loses, there will

That's a wish, not a policy. "I am going to help the Middle Class". Democrats have been on the W.H for 12 of the last 16 years, how has this worked out for struggling Americans?

You don't help the Middle Class by spending MORE money on economic purchases such as homes or restriction competition by creating price controls on low margin businesses. This will ensure inflation and limited supply.

You don't help Americans by signing off on the I.R.A which was a disaster from the start and for which many "expert economists" aka "Dem loyalists" should be fired and driven to pursue another industry because clearly economics is not their forte. Perhaps these economists could, I don't know, run for mayor or something.

Based on her consistently far left policies which may have only shifted slightly due to donor demands, I don't subscribe to her economic philosophies. Nor, I suspect do most Americans.
IRA and the Infrastructure bill have helped the middle class Bigly.

Bidenomics is based on stimulating the middle class economy
Long overdue
 
So you're saying if a rumor is started by the Republicans it will always be true?

About sums up the infantile nature of half of this forum (or more)
Nope....just that rumors have an element of truth somewhere in them...whether it's an accurate prediction of likely behaviors of known behaviors or something like that.
 
Almost guaranteed, the Dems are a political party not a policy party. This is why Trump is a sucker for accepting the debate on ABC and not forcing her on to go onto Fox as well.

He is being played almost certainly which is why they added the additions of notes and sitting down etc, it was to get Trump to the debate by appearing to capitulate. This took the focus off of "three debates" which Trump promoted often and made him feel he is somehow "winning" by getting her to accept the original debate terms. Huh?

It is what it is. The average citizen has to watch a three month media sprint to the W.H after Biden left.
Overview of Agenda47

Agenda47 is a campaign platform presented by Donald Trump, primarily focusing on various political and economic issues. While it encompasses a range of topics, environmental issues are often not highlighted prominently in his proposals.

Environmental Issues in Agenda47

  • Limited Focus: Many observers have noted that environmental concerns did not receive substantial attention in Agenda47 compared to other topics like immigration, the economy, and law enforcement.
  • Energy Policy: Trump's approach tends to favor traditional energy sources, such as oil and gas, rather than prioritizing renewable energy initiatives.
  • Regulatory Rollbacks: Historically, Trump's administration has advocated rolling back many environmental regulations, which may reflect his stance in this agenda as well.

Conclusion

In summary, Agenda47 does not prominently address environmental issues, focusing instead on sectors like the economy and immigration.

==>Failing to address the environmental issues could be a major misstep for Trump during the debate. With growing concerns about climate change and sustainability, voters are increasingly looking for candidates who have strong policies on these issues.

Ignoring or downplaying them could alienate a significant portion of the electorate and ultimately cost him support. It is crucial that he thoroughly prepares and articulates his stance on environmental issues to avoid coming a cropper during the debate. :)

Source:


 
Why should she debate when she’s ahead?
Because she respects the American people who need to hear from her to understand who she is and what EXACTLY she supports. They need to make an informed decision about how she would effect their lives.

Anything less is reminiscent of dictators and authoritarians. Maybe that's what you want. :dunno:
 
Back
Top Bottom