I could go along with that. I don't want to ever see a teacher punished for not calling a boy "she," even though I have advocated for that as a way to avoid disruptive behavior.
Yes, a wise teacher would know when to tell parents and when not. I once had a female student tell me that she was pansexual. I asked if that had anything to do with fried chicken. Later she told me that she was trans, and her name was James. At the next opportunity, I told her "James! Ladies first!" when she and a female student were picking a snack. That was the last I heard of James. But before I'd seriously treat her as a male student and chastise students for "deadnaming" her and whatnot, I'd want parents involved.
My real concern is that schools not deliberately hide such information. Especially that they do not punish teachers for hiding that information.
Obviously, since safety comes first, kids (and adults) need to use the bathroom for their biological gender.
Just as obviously, since I know what an enormous benefit sports are for girls, I don't want girls sports to be dominated by boys.
I had to look that up. At least in Texas, it is mandatory that parents have access to this information:
Sec. 26.004. ACCESS TO STUDENT RECORDS.
(a) In this section, "intervention strategy" means a strategy in a multi-tiered system of supports that is above the level of intervention generally used in that system with all children. The term includes response to intervention and other early intervening strategies.
(b) A parent is entitled to access to all written records of a school district concerning the parent's child, including:
(1) attendance records;
(2) test scores;
(3) grades;
(4) disciplinary records;
(5) counseling records;
(6) psychological records;
(7) applications for admission;
(8) health and immunization information;
(9) teacher and school counselor evaluations;
(10) reports of behavioral patterns; and
(11) records relating to assistance provided for learning difficulties, including information collected regarding any intervention strategies used with the child.
Yes, that is right. "Gender affirming care" can wait. 18 should be the minimum age for anything but social transitioning and counselling. 21 for surgery.
I disagree with Abbott's approach strongly, and I said so in this thread:
Tennessee's Republican Gov. Bill Lee on Thursday signed legislation banning minors from receiving gender-affirming care despite threats from civil rights organizations that vowed to sue if and when the bill becomes law. Lee also signed another law restricting drag shows from taking place in...
www.usmessageboard.com
Post #8.
Basically my point is that one state might report to CPS a parent providing "gender affirming care" while another state reports a parent for not doing so. It isn't CPS' role to make determinations like that, it is the state legislature's. I'd fully support a ban on transgender surgery and hormones for children, but not sic'ing CPS on parents who follow doctors poor advice.
The overwhelming majority of parents provide love support and guidance in general on most topics which is what I "know."
Whether those same loving, supportive and guiding parents will provide love, support and guidance specifically to a child who tells them they are transgender depends on how you define love, support and guidance in such a case. If you define it
only as telling the child "you're right!" and quickly getting them to a gender specialist to get the hormines stared, I believe that would be a pretty small minority. Most loving parents first go-to would be to tell the child to wait before making up their mind about something like that. That's the best guidance in that situation.
Yep . . .