Rather than a nation governed by laws, the United States is now a nation governed by a hate-filled president, media propaganda, questionable judicial rulings, tax dollar funded political agendas, executive orders, bureaucratic arrogance, and international pressures.
Irrespective of obvious governing factors media stooges repeatedly tell us that America is a nation of laws. The lie is told to cover for Democrats whenever they are openly violating every law except their favorites. So which laws do they have in mind when they tell us America is a nation of laws? Certainly not these four:
1. Tax law.
The IRS scandal pretty much shows what Democrats think of tax laws.
2. Immigration law.
Open-borders and flat-out refusing to enforce immigration laws shows what Democrats and Republicans think of immigration laws. Hell, they think so little they want to reward lawbreakers with amnesty.
3. Environmental law.
Democrat disdain for environmental law is implemented by the EPA.
4. Funding law.
Continued funding for ACORN et al. in spite of the law is well-documented. ACORN and the first three combined do not hold a candle to abortion funding.
It is against the law to use tax dollars to fund abortion. Click on the link and move the cursor to 1:46 to hear a variation of Planned Parenthood bookkeeping:
Planned Parenthood claims they do not use tax dollars to fund or advocate abortion, yet they fight tooth and nail against segregating its lucrative abortion business from the rest of their professed healthcare business:
Planned Parenthood’s “legitimate” tax dollar business appears to be nothing more than providing referrals:
For years I’ve tried to define an ideology that advocates killing with kindness. Here are some of my updated conclusions.
The sickness permeating the Democrat party stems from the concept of humane killing. Socialists truly believe that killing babies in the womb is the same as killing animals humanely. Clearly, Democrats defending abortions see unborn children as animals being put down humanely.
Click on the link. The video begins in a few seconds. Listen and you’ll hear liberal ideology stated in plain English:
Reid said nothing more than let kids with cancer die humanely. I’m sure if he could get away with it he would personally put down kids with cancer for the same reason wounded animals are destroyed. The only ideological difference between Reid and Kermit Gosnell is that Gosnell did his own butchering:
And how’s this for torturing logic to fit the agenda:
Does Harry Reid not realize that Gosnell performed legal abortions! Even if Gosnell’s clinic had been "clean and sterile" he killed infants. And you can be sure that other abortion clinics like Gosnell’s hired a cleaning lady so they could continue performing "clean and sterile" late-term abortions.
Only those without shame defend and promote infanticide. To the shameless the act of killing is humane when it is done legally and/or collectively.
At the same time Socialists “humanely” slaughter tens of millions children they swear they want to save the poor along with saving every non-human life form in the universe. Could it be that Socialists, wallowing in a perverted orgy of self-righteous logic, are attacking the very existence of conscience-driven shame by removing sorrow from infanticide?
Is it any wonder that Socialists/Communists posing as Democrats insist on aligning themselves exclusively with economic issues when it comes right down to defining Socialism?
The entitlement mentality is the natural offspring of the tax collector’s morality. The entitlement mentality says “The government has to take care of me but not take care of babies in the womb.” For that sick piece of collectivism to fester and grow there had to be a widespread misunderstanding of the government’s role in a society of free people.
Finally, no Democrat ever said “Let’s physically torture infants until they die.” even though the tax on incomes in pursuit of “the common good” morphed into a moral duty to kill human beings, but only if it can be done humanely. Question: How many babies have been killed “humanely” because of income tax funding? Answer: 99.999 percent more than the number killed in illegal, back-ally, abortions.
Irrespective of obvious governing factors media stooges repeatedly tell us that America is a nation of laws. The lie is told to cover for Democrats whenever they are openly violating every law except their favorites. So which laws do they have in mind when they tell us America is a nation of laws? Certainly not these four:
1. Tax law.
The IRS scandal pretty much shows what Democrats think of tax laws.
2. Immigration law.
Open-borders and flat-out refusing to enforce immigration laws shows what Democrats and Republicans think of immigration laws. Hell, they think so little they want to reward lawbreakers with amnesty.
3. Environmental law.
Democrat disdain for environmental law is implemented by the EPA.
4. Funding law.
Continued funding for ACORN et al. in spite of the law is well-documented. ACORN and the first three combined do not hold a candle to abortion funding.
It is against the law to use tax dollars to fund abortion. Click on the link and move the cursor to 1:46 to hear a variation of Planned Parenthood bookkeeping:
Planned Parenthood claims they do not use tax dollars to fund or advocate abortion, yet they fight tooth and nail against segregating its lucrative abortion business from the rest of their professed healthcare business:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VogpAhTI25A&feature=player_detailpage]Laura Ingraham & Billy O'Reilly: Planned Parenthood "All About Abortion" (1.6.12) - YouTube[/ame]
Planned Parenthood’s “legitimate” tax dollar business appears to be nothing more than providing referrals:
For years I’ve tried to define an ideology that advocates killing with kindness. Here are some of my updated conclusions.
The sickness permeating the Democrat party stems from the concept of humane killing. Socialists truly believe that killing babies in the womb is the same as killing animals humanely. Clearly, Democrats defending abortions see unborn children as animals being put down humanely.
Click on the link. The video begins in a few seconds. Listen and you’ll hear liberal ideology stated in plain English:
Reid said nothing more than let kids with cancer die humanely. I’m sure if he could get away with it he would personally put down kids with cancer for the same reason wounded animals are destroyed. The only ideological difference between Reid and Kermit Gosnell is that Gosnell did his own butchering:
And how’s this for torturing logic to fit the agenda:
Does Harry Reid not realize that Gosnell performed legal abortions! Even if Gosnell’s clinic had been "clean and sterile" he killed infants. And you can be sure that other abortion clinics like Gosnell’s hired a cleaning lady so they could continue performing "clean and sterile" late-term abortions.
Only those without shame defend and promote infanticide. To the shameless the act of killing is humane when it is done legally and/or collectively.
At the same time Socialists “humanely” slaughter tens of millions children they swear they want to save the poor along with saving every non-human life form in the universe. Could it be that Socialists, wallowing in a perverted orgy of self-righteous logic, are attacking the very existence of conscience-driven shame by removing sorrow from infanticide?
Is it any wonder that Socialists/Communists posing as Democrats insist on aligning themselves exclusively with economic issues when it comes right down to defining Socialism?
The entitlement mentality is the natural offspring of the tax collector’s morality. The entitlement mentality says “The government has to take care of me but not take care of babies in the womb.” For that sick piece of collectivism to fester and grow there had to be a widespread misunderstanding of the government’s role in a society of free people.
Finally, no Democrat ever said “Let’s physically torture infants until they die.” even though the tax on incomes in pursuit of “the common good” morphed into a moral duty to kill human beings, but only if it can be done humanely. Question: How many babies have been killed “humanely” because of income tax funding? Answer: 99.999 percent more than the number killed in illegal, back-ally, abortions.
Last edited:
