Orangecat
Diamond Member
- Jun 22, 2020
- 20,705
- 23,041
- 2,288
Republicans weren’t the party of vaccine mandates. That was your side.Lousy authoritarian Republicans anyway......
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Republicans weren’t the party of vaccine mandates. That was your side.Lousy authoritarian Republicans anyway......
Republicans weren’t the party of vaccine mandates. That was your side.
You are the Democrat.
Republicans weren’t the party of vaccine mandates. That was your side.
You are delusional. Did you vote for Trump?You are the Democrat.
I’ve dealt with his dumb ass enough to know he’s a lefty. Been a bit better lately, but I have a long memory.He doesn't have a side.
He is a non- participant.
You are delusional. Did you vote for Trump?
Yawn. Go pester someone else with your gaslighting nonsense, kid.I didn't vote for Biden like you.
Stupid is a you post.MADA (Make America Diseased Again)
Stupid is..as stupid does.
I’ve dealt with his dumb ass enough to know he’s a lefty. Been a bit better lately, but I have a long memory.
Yawn. Go pester someone else with your gaslighting nonsense, kid.
All I'm asking for is your source for the 25%. Why is that so difficult for you to produce? Be honest, did you just make it up?Mortality rates from "cancer" have dropped drastically from what they once were. People aren't dying from cancer as they once were. But they do have long lasting consequences as a result of having it don't they?
I'm not suggesting foil helmets either.
I'm saying fully informed consent is what is needed. The risks of vaccination and the risks of the disease both need to be disclosed. But you don't want the long term effects of Covid-19 disclosed....because you want something other than informed consent. WHY?
Yep..All I'm asking for is your source for the 25%. Why is that so difficult for you to produce? Be honest, did you just make it up?
So, post your source for that, if you can. This is your last chance. After this, if you fail to link to your source, it will be assumed that you are, indeed, just making up stuff that sounds good to you. I showed you how it's done.Yep..
.I made it up. The truth is closer to 57%
I already did. Look in past posts to see the NIH study.So, post your source for that, if you can. This is your last chance. After this, if you fail to link to your source, it will be assumed that you are, indeed, just making up stuff that sounds good to you. I showed you how it's done.
There are 195 posts in this thread. I'm not going back through all of them looking for it. In which post did you put the link?I already did. Look in past posts to see the NIH study.
It's just on the preceeding page.There are 195 posts in this thread. I'm not going back through all of them looking for it. In which post did you put the link?
Gosh....it popped right up.
Why do people not want to others to know these things? It's crucial for informed consent.
Long COVID in the United States - PMC
Although yet to be clearly identified as a clinical condition, there is immense concern at the health and wellbeing consequences of long COVID. Using data collected from nearly half a million Americans in the period June 2022-December 2022 in the US ...pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
In their systematic review of 194 studies–most of them in Europe—O’Mahoney et al. [8] showed that at an average follow-up time of 126 days, 45% of COVID survivors, regardless of hospitalization status, go on to experience at least one unresolved symptom. In addition, the prevalence of ongoing symptoms appears to be higher in post-hospitalized cohorts compared to non-hospitalized populations. Taquet et al. [9] conducted a retrospective cohort study based on linked electronic health records (EHRs) data from 81 million patients including 273,618 COVID survivors and found 57% of patients having at least one long-COVID feature recorded within the first 180 days after infection and 37% having them in the 90 to 180 days after diagnosis.
The TRUTH is ALWAYS highly nuanced.There are 195 posts in this thread. I'm not going back through all of them looking for it. In which post did you put the link?
Okay, I'm quoting the abstract of the paper here:It's just on the preceeding page.