I just voted in Arizona. Democrats are spending tens of millions of dollars on PROP 139 a.k.a the LIE of Reproductive Rights.

[MarathonMike]

As I have posted in other threads, the blitz of thousands of Kamala ads on fighting "Arizona's abortion ban" is pushing a TOTAL LIE. The current Arizona law imposes a 15 week limit on fetal age on abortions. Their oh so noble PROP 139 removes ALL RESTRICTIONS on fetal age. Is that what women want to call "Reproductive Rights"? Are you really that ghoulish? Or just grossly misinformed?

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Democrats always say how rare 9 month/3rd trimester abortions are but never denounce them.

That’s EXTREMELY telling.

But yes, they are out spreading disinformation, the thing they say they are opposed to but gladly put out to harm their opponents

 

[JoeB131]

As I have posted in other threads, the blitz of thousands of Kamala ads on fighting "Arizona's abortion ban" is pushing a TOTAL LIE. The current Arizona law imposes a 15 week limit on fetal age on abortions. Their oh so noble PROP 139 removes ALL RESTRICTIONS on fetal age. Is that what women want to call "Reproductive Rights"? Are you really that ghoulish? Or just grossly misinformed?

Or we realize that this decision should be between a woman and her doctor, Period.

The reason why this vote was necessary was that the initial interpretation post Dobbs was that an 1864 Abortion Law applied. Nobody trusts the politicians, that's why they have to vote back in the Pre-Dobbs restrictions.

 

[Independent thinker]

As I have posted in other threads, the blitz of thousands of Kamala ads on fighting "Arizona's abortion ban" is pushing a TOTAL LIE. The current Arizona law imposes a 15 week limit on fetal age on abortions. Their oh so noble PROP 139 removes ALL RESTRICTIONS on fetal age. Is that what women want to call "Reproductive Rights"? Are you really that ghoulish? Or just grossly misinformed?

We have a prop here in Kentucky about using public tax money for private schools and Democrats are lying through their teeth about it. There is this one ad that they play constantly that if you vote for this then rural schools will be hurt but the lady in the ad is a big city progressive who doesn't seem to realize that rural Kentucky is deep dark red. You'd think that rural America would know whether it would hurt their schools or not.

But, anyway, for the record, this has been done already in several other locations and it did not hurt rural schools. If this lady wanted to tell the truth, she could just say how much it turns her stomach to see public tax money get funneled for religious education.

 

[Arlette]

As I have posted in other threads, the blitz of thousands of Kamala ads on fighting "Arizona's abortion ban" is pushing a TOTAL LIE. The current Arizona law imposes a 15 week limit on fetal age on abortions. Their oh so noble PROP 139 removes ALL RESTRICTIONS on fetal age. Is that what women want to call "Reproductive Rights"? Are you really that ghoulish? Or just grossly misinformed?

Men wouldn't accept any restrictions on their bodily autonomy. Neither do women.

 

[hadit]

Democrats always say how rare 9 month/3rd trimester abortions are but never denounce them.

That’s EXTREMELY telling.

But yes, they are out spreading disinformation, the thing they say they are opposed to but gladly put out to harm their opponents

They claim the abortions don't happen that late, then give the lie to that statement by refusing to put restrictions into law.

 

[hadit]

Men wouldn't accept any restrictions on their bodily autonomy. Neither do women.

Actually, men LOSE their reproductive freedom the moment a woman gets pregnant. At that point she can deny him fatherhood or force it on him and there's nothing he can legally do about it.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

They claim the abortions don't happen that late, then give the lie to that statement by refusing to put restrictions into law.

Exactly. If it was immoral, we’d make it illegal.

They don’t want to make it illegal. Deep down they know most people think 3rd trimester abortions are completely immoral. They want to allow this under the radar

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Of course, there is an abortion ban in Arizona after 15 weeks, without exceptions for rape or incest.

That's the ban they don't want.

Wade through the OPs weird lies and fetishes, and it's very clear.

Their oh so noble PROP 139 removes ALL RESTRICTIONS on fetal age.

Lie.

Up to viability.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Of course, there is an abortion ban in Arizona after 15 weeks, without exceptions for rape or incest.

That's the ban they don't want.

Wade through the OPs weird lies and fetishes, and it's very clear.

Lie.

Up to viability.

I don’t think you understand how to apply the word “ban”

Pathetic hyperbole

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I don’t think you understand how to apply the word “ban”

Pathetic hyperbole

They are going to delete the 15 week ban with no exceptions for rape or incest in favor of a ban after viability.

You're an excitable little guy. I really can't be any more gentle with the language for you.

Your little ban is going bye bye. Wave bye bye!

 

[White 6]

As I have posted in other threads, the blitz of thousands of Kamala ads on fighting "Arizona's abortion ban" is pushing a TOTAL LIE. The current Arizona law imposes a 15 week limit on fetal age on abortions. Their oh so noble PROP 139 removes ALL RESTRICTIONS on fetal age. Is that what women want to call "Reproductive Rights"? Are you really that ghoulish? Or just grossly misinformed?

It looks like with will pass, overwhelmingly, protecting women's rights.

 

[Arlette]

Actually, men LOSE their reproductive freedom the moment a woman gets pregnant. At that point she can deny him fatherhood or force it on him and there's nothing he can legally do about it.

We don't give a shit

 

[MarathonMike]

We don't give a shit

You sure don't give a shit about unborn babies.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

They are going to delete the 15 week ban with no exceptions for rape or incest in favor of a ban after viability.

You're an excitable little guy. I really can't be any more gentle with the language for you.

Your little ban is going bye bye. Wave bye bye!

I don’t live in Arizona, so I guess you’re a bit off. Color me surprised.

 

[MarathonMike]

View attachment 1027232
View attachment 1027233
View attachment 1027235
It looks like with will pass, overwhelmingly, protecting women's rights.

Nothing like a multi-million dollar ad blitz to fool women into thinking they are voting for "Women's rights" when all they are doing is making the fetus fair game all the way to full term. WOOHOO HOORAY FOR WOMEN"S RIGHTS!!!!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

View attachment 1027232
View attachment 1027233
View attachment 1027235
It looks like with will pass, overwhelmingly, protecting women's rights.

As it does every time a referendum on it goes to the polls.

Which is why the "leave it to the states!" liars are trying to prevent these referendums.

 

[excalibur]

Or we realize that this decision should be between a woman and her doctor, Period.

The reason why this vote was necessary was that the initial interpretation post Dobbs was that an 1864 Abortion Law applied. Nobody trusts the politicians, that's why they have to vote back in the Pre-Dobbs restrictions.

Except another human being is in the middle of it.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I don’t live in Arizona, so I guess you’re a bit off. Color me surprised.

Sorry, I got you two rude little cacklers mixed up.

Sorry I bothered you. Go back to trying to convince someone a ban isn't a ban. Maybe you will get lucky and find someone dumb enough.

 

[excalibur]

View attachment 1027232
View attachment 1027233
View attachment 1027235
It looks like with will pass, overwhelmingly, protecting women's rights.

What rights? Oh, to kill another human being.