I don't think anyone would say that the Obama economy is perfect, but 73 months of unprecedented...

If it was a state min wage how could Obama raise it?
Are you really this dumb? Nothing I am talking about has anything to do with Obama raising state minimum wage. If the federal minimum wage was raised to 10.10 per hour, 18 million people would see a raise. This isn't hard to grasp.
This is your exact quote:
Obama tried to fix this by raising the minimum wage to a very reasonable 10.10 per hour.

That means that Obama already raised the min wage to 10,10 per hour.
But he didnt. He only raised the min wage for federal workers to that point.
You have been caught yet again in a stupid and now are trying desperately to cover your ass. It wont work.
Lol I am well aware that Obama tried and failed to raise federal minimum wage in the private sector. Oh well if you can't figure that out.
Billy youre not aware you're alive. You've contradicted yourself and backpedalled so often on this thread even you don't know what youv'e posted.
You try waaayyy too hard.
LOL.
Billy, perpetual derp on USMB. C'mon, it's time for another fail thread. How about "The GOP hates blacks so much they would never have one run for president"?
 
Let me get this straight: so....everyone who recognizes you as a 'fence sitter' is a "hardcore partisan ideologue from the "other side"???


Is that the story you tell yourself????


Does it work....or does your face fall when you gaze in the mirror?


The truth will set you free.....you could begin this way: "Well...there are some good things about being a fence sitter...."

Or....."My name is Mac, and I am a fence sitter" (11 more steps to go!)
You asked, I answered.

I'll keep thinking for myself, you keep doing what you're doing.
.


Let's be clear.....nobody said you don't think for yourself.

We just said you don't have the courage to pick a side and defend it.

Hence, fence sitter.



Which....of course, is your right (giggle, giggle)
And look at all the effort you're putting into this.

Illustrating my point, again.
.



The only point you have is under your hat.
Perfect!
.




OK!
OK!

You have a PERFECT point under your hat.
 
. It failed to fix the recession but that doesn't mean it didn't create millions of jobs you doofus.l.
LOL!! You cannot make this shit up!!!
Yes I know you have trouble with nuance. It's okay. I'm used to it. Here's more from, you know, actual economists:

Was the Obama Stimulus a Success or a Failure?

Compared to Bush??

bikini-graph-private-sector-June-2014.jpg


12928326_985090438194397_5308961829131217847_n.jpg
Who negotiated the Iraq Agreement? Yeah, a real leader.

We should have never been in Iraq. If Saddam Hussein hadn't tried to assassinate Bush's Daddy we never would have been. Oh well.....just cost about 4500 young American lives and another 35,000 seriously wounded. As far as the expense.......at least a trillion dollars.
 
And yes Campbell I notice you haven't addressed my post.
It takes a better person to deal with information that is contrary to what you want to believe.
Like most, apparently, you just want to ignore it and keeping posting up what you want to believe.

Bush assumed a balanced budget with surpluses projected all the way to a paid off debt. Guess what the cowboy wannabe did? That's right sport's fans, cut tax rates for rich folks twice, started two wars, one totally unnecessary, never cut spending a dime and doubled the national debt from $5.7 to $11.9 trillion. What a leader!
 
LOL!! You cannot make this shit up!!!
Yes I know you have trouble with nuance. It's okay. I'm used to it. Here's more from, you know, actual economists:

Was the Obama Stimulus a Success or a Failure?

Compared to Bush??

bikini-graph-private-sector-June-2014.jpg


12928326_985090438194397_5308961829131217847_n.jpg
Who negotiated the Iraq Agreement? Yeah, a real leader.

We should have never been in Iraq. If Saddam Hussein hadn't tried to assassinate Bush's Daddy we never would have been. Oh well.....just cost about 4500 young American lives and another 35,000 seriously wounded. As far as the expense.......at least a trillion dollars.
Who negotiated the Iraq Agreement, dumbshit? Yeah, Bush. It takes a LEADER to negotiate a peaceful resolution. It takes a buffoon to fuck it all to hell.
 
And yes Campbell I notice you haven't addressed my post.
It takes a better person to deal with information that is contrary to what you want to believe.
Like most, apparently, you just want to ignore it and keeping posting up what you want to believe.

Bush assumed a balanced budget with surpluses projected all the way to a paid off debt. Guess what the cowboy wannabe did? That's right sport's fans, cut tax rates for rich folks twice, started two wars, one totally unnecessary, never cut spending a dime and doubled the national debt from $5.7 to $11.9 trillion. What a leader!
Idiot.
Bush assumed an economy falling into recession as a result of CLinton's raising taxes and the bust of the dot com boom. Also he inherited Clinton's failed terrorism policy that caused 9/11.
Quit blaming Bush, dumbshit. Obama and the Dems own this economy and this foreign policy and everyone knows they have failed.
 
And yes Campbell I notice you haven't addressed my post.
It takes a better person to deal with information that is contrary to what you want to believe.
Like most, apparently, you just want to ignore it and keeping posting up what you want to believe.

Bush assumed a balanced budget with surpluses projected all the way to a paid off debt. Guess what the cowboy wannabe did? That's right sport's fans, cut tax rates for rich folks twice, started two wars, one totally unnecessary, never cut spending a dime and doubled the national debt from $5.7 to $11.9 trillion. What a leader!

Well let's start with the fallacies in that post.

1 - That Bush assumed a balanced budget. There were no years prior to 1957 where the budget was in balance. They did get close in one year of the Clinton presidency though.
2 - There were ever any surpluses in the Clinton years. Again, no years prior to 1957 were there any surpluses.
3 - The 2009 budget you're attributing to Bush, when in fact the person who signed it, and the other massive spending for 2009 was Barrack Hussein Obama.

Now don't get me wrong, going from 5.7 trillion to over 10 trillion is bad. It's just not as bad as going from 10 trillion and change to 19 trillion and change.
 
If a Republican were president, the RWnuts would be raving about this economy 10 threads a day.
If a Republican were president, it would be something to rave about.

Yep, that Republican Congress has been kicking ass with the jobs and economic improvement bills. You are such a rube. A Republican president is not required for Congress to act. If they put up a real bill with honest intentions, there is no doubt the president would sign it.
 
If a Republican were president, the RWnuts would be raving about this economy 10 threads a day.
If a Republican were president, it would be something to rave about.

Yep, that Republican Congress has been kicking ass with the jobs and economic improvement bills. You are such a rube. A Republican president is not required for Congress to act. If they put up a real bill with honest intentions, there is no doubt the president would sign it.

A "real bill," meaning a Democrat reelection slush fund. That's all these so-called "jobs bills" are. They provide Democrats with money to bribe people into voting Democrat.

If I had my way, it would be unconstitutional to pass anything called a "jobs bill."
 
Still waiting ot hear how record spending and gov't dependence has helped this economy.
Food stamps are the driver of the Obama economy.
Please explain what data you're looking at that leads you to believe the economy sucks?
Probably GDP growth under 3% every year and record numbers of people not working and/or collecting benefits.
GDP growth is so low thanks to a pathetic stimulus and a lack of deficit spending.

Three things Republicans are good for:

Tax cuts for the rich

Increased spending

Increasing the national debt

It's what they do
Tax cuts for everybody translates into tax cuts for the rich in libspeak.

Spending goes through the roof when Democrats can get away with it and their base thinks Republicans are responsible, even though they don't support the social spending. It makes no sense but that's what they believe.

Liberals fight any attempt to balance the budget and blame debt on Republicans.

The Democrat party heads lie and their puppets mindlessly gobble it up. It's what they do.

God forbid that people actually earn enough money to actually afford school, medical, housing and all the things the left promises to give to us for free from the government. Boooo! Rich people Booooo!

Yep, the president has an app for running the govt. The wage adjuster is on the same page as jobs and gas.
You should ask employers why they don't pay more, not the president.

corporate-profits-and-wages.webp
 
If a Republican were president, the RWnuts would be raving about this economy 10 threads a day.
If a Republican were president, it would be something to rave about.

Yep, that Republican Congress has been kicking ass with the jobs and economic improvement bills. You are such a rube. A Republican president is not required for Congress to act. If they put up a real bill with honest intentions, there is no doubt the president would sign it.

A "real bill," meaning a Democrat reelection slush fund. That's all these so-called "jobs bills" are. They provide Democrats with money to bribe people into voting Democrat.

If I had my way, it would be unconstitutional to pass anything called a "jobs bill."

So how do you propose the president changes anything to improve your economic outlook with no bills, no EOs?

You've had a republican Congress for over a year and they have done nothing.
 
Unemployment down, spending up, stock market up, housing market up...gee, things are so terrible we need "the Donald" to "Make America Great Again". Thanks, but the current President did that already.

Trump reminds me of a spoiled junior high school student.

He learned from Obama, it seems you fools go for that stuff.

View attachment 70146

Except the emancipation proclamation was an executive order.

 
And the single most important statistic about the economy that Obamabots like Billy000 ignore....

Since 2009, the top 7% earners have enjoyed an unprecedented 33% increase in earnings. The bottom 93% of WORKING Americans have suffered an average 5% loss.

The recovery - 100% of it - has went to the wealthiest Americans. PERIOD.

And guess what. It hasn't and never will trickle down. The idea that tax cuts for those same folks will is ludicrous.
 
Unemployment down, spending up, stock market up, housing market up...gee, things are so terrible we need "the Donald" to "Make America Great Again". Thanks, but the current President did that already.

Trump reminds me of a spoiled junior high school student.

He learned from Obama, it seems you fools go for that stuff.

View attachment 70146

Except the emancipation proclamation was an executive order.



War strategy that's all that was. Plus kind of hard to do don't ya kind of think ?
 
Unemployment down, spending up, stock market up, housing market up...gee, things are so terrible we need "the Donald" to "Make America Great Again". Thanks, but the current President did that already.

Trump reminds me of a spoiled junior high school student.

He learned from Obama, it seems you fools go for that stuff.

View attachment 70146

Except the emancipation proclamation was an executive order.



War strategy that's all that was. Plus kind of hard to do don't ya kind of think ?


No,I think you're not so smart. That's all it was.
 
Unemployment down, spending up, stock market up, housing market up...gee, things are so terrible we need "the Donald" to "Make America Great Again". Thanks, but the current President did that already.

Trump reminds me of a spoiled junior high school student.

He learned from Obama, it seems you fools go for that stuff.

View attachment 70146

Except the emancipation proclamation was an executive order.



War strategy that's all that was. Plus kind of hard to do don't ya kind of think ?


No,I think you're not so smart. That's all it was.



Mmmmmmmkkkkk now, I think your yellow bus is waiting.....

upload_2016-4-4_21-16-7.webp
 
Still waiting ot hear how record spending and gov't dependence has helped this economy.
Food stamps are the driver of the Obama economy.
Probably GDP growth under 3% every year and record numbers of people not working and/or collecting benefits.
GDP growth is so low thanks to a pathetic stimulus and a lack of deficit spending.

Three things Republicans are good for:

Tax cuts for the rich

Increased spending

Increasing the national debt

It's what they do
Tax cuts for everybody translates into tax cuts for the rich in libspeak.

Spending goes through the roof when Democrats can get away with it and their base thinks Republicans are responsible, even though they don't support the social spending. It makes no sense but that's what they believe.

Liberals fight any attempt to balance the budget and blame debt on Republicans.

The Democrat party heads lie and their puppets mindlessly gobble it up. It's what they do.

God forbid that people actually earn enough money to actually afford school, medical, housing and all the things the left promises to give to us for free from the government. Boooo! Rich people Booooo!

Yep, the president has an app for running the govt. The wage adjuster is on the same page as jobs and gas.
You should ask employers why they don't pay more, not the president.

View attachment 70259
I dont have to ask, I already know. They dont pay more because they dont have to. Because Obama's policies have been such crap there is a surplus of unemployed and underemployed labor keeping wages down. With some decent pro business policies and a stable regulatory environment busineses would begin investing their hordes of cash and employment would improve. But not gioing to happen under the worst president in modern history.
 
You do know the federal MW is not 10.10 an hour don't you?

That rate was for government contractors only

MAybe you better look shit up before you post it
And apparently you don't understand the concept of state minimum wage. 18 million people make less than 10.10 per hour. That means 18 million people would see a raise if the federal wage was increased to 10.10 per hour.
Obama never tried to raise the federal minimum wage all he did was raise the minimum that the federal government pays to contractors
Um no he attempted to do both.

OK then post the bill and the votes on it
Senate Republicans block Obama bid to hike minimum wage | Reuters
Wow the senate finally did something worthwhile
 
You do know the federal MW is not 10.10 an hour don't you?

That rate was for government contractors only

MAybe you better look shit up before you post it
And apparently you don't understand the concept of state minimum wage. 18 million people make less than 10.10 per hour. That means 18 million people would see a raise if the federal wage was increased to 10.10 per hour.
If it was a state min wage how could Obama raise it?
Are you really this dumb? Nothing I am talking about has anything to do with Obama raising state minimum wage. If the federal minimum wage was raised to 10.10 per hour, 18 million people would see a raise. This isn't hard to grasp.
This is your exact quote:
Obama tried to fix this by raising the minimum wage to a very reasonable 10.10 per hour.

That means that Obama already raised the min wage to 10,10 per hour.
But he didnt. He only raised the min wage for federal workers to that point.
You have been caught yet again in a stupid and now are trying desperately to cover your ass. It wont work.
Lol I am well aware that Obama tried and failed to raise federal minimum wage in the private sector. Oh well if you can't figure that out.

Tried and failed
 
Back
Top Bottom